GTM said:I have met a number of people who are retiring young with real good pensions. (50k to 100K) per year. some COLA.
What do you think is more valuable
A good pension from a good source or a good nest egg invested.
If the federal govt would give me the lump-sum equivalent of my COLA pension payments then I'd take it in a heartbeat.grumpy said:I had to contribute 7.5% of my salary to this system during my 32 years of federal service. I haven't run the numbers but I don't see how I could have invested that 7.5% to generate the return represented by my pension. Grumpy
OK, now I'm drooling. Anyone know how to convert today's $33,864/year pension with future CPI-U COLAs into a lump sum?Patrick said:You can't tell which is more valuable without putting some numbers to both. According to SG, pensions are worth about 22 times their annual value in cash investments. I.E., $10k/year pension = $220K cash.
For some reason I expected this to be much more complicated. I guess it's easy for the govt to assume that inflation will stay 3.3% in perpetuity. In fact it's quite a bit to their advantage.MasterBlaster said:Anyone know how to convert today's $33,864/year pension with future CPI-U COLAs into a lump sum?
The Lump sum (present value) calculations must always assume a prevailing interest rate. Some people use the 30 year T-bond rate (maybe 4.50 % or so) or you can use whatever is reasonable.
For present values of annuities that have an inflation adjusted kicker then just use the prevailing rate (ie. T-bond rate) less the prevailing inflation (CPI rate - maybe 3.3 percent or so).
So if my numbers are correct the interest rate you'd use to compute your present value would be (4.5-3.3 = 1.2 percent)
You'll need to compute the present value of the annuity over your life expectancy which (of course) varies with age and gender.
So using my interest numbers numbers, and guessing a life expectancy of 25 years, I get a prese4nt value of $727,674.42 for your payout.
Here's a link to a calculator that will figure your lump sum given an interest rate
http://www.hughchou.org/calc/missing.cgi
Uh, spouse? Gee, what spouse?smooch said:But remember - If you don't have LTC insurance and your spouse needs a nursing home, your 401(K)/403(B) is available for Medicaid. Your pension is not.
You have to be careful with this approximation. It was true for one case I looked at. That case assumed a non-COLA'd pension that comprised only a small part of the total retirement income. It also assumed a 50/50 stock/bond allocation for the rest of the portfolio. For a COLA'd pension, you can be pretty safe using a 25x rule.Patrick said:You can't tell which is more valuable without putting some numbers to both. According to SG, pensions are worth about 22 times their annual value in cash investments. I.E., $10k/year pension = $220K cash.
That's a good point. From the point of view of personal income safety, the 25x (4% rule) is a good approximation of the value of the COLA'd pension. But there is a big difference in that valuation formula as far as your heirs are concerned.MasterBlaster said:. . .For a COLA'd pension, you can be pretty safe using a 25x rule.
what a coincidence, the inflation adjusted pension at 25x is just the 4 percent safe withdrawel rate. The difference is that your heirs get to keep the principle.
There's enough calculators there to analyze your stash till the cows come home.
CyclingInvestor said:Strangely, now that I can walk out anytime I feel less reason to
actually do so, since my only previous source of stress was fear of being
laid off and not finding a new job, which has happened to several friends
in IT.
Jay_Gatsby said:The LBYM-types wouldn't necessarily be stressed out by the lack of a job, but rather by the effect such a situation would have on FIRE.