I currently have two more years on ACA, so that pretty much limits my maximum AGI and how much I might convert to ROTH. I probably plan to defer SS until 70. I am starting to try to calculate what my RMD hit will be and to figure out how that might affect my ROTH conversion strategy.
For the sake of argument, let's use the following:
Estimated annual SS: $40,800
Est. investment income: $12,000
Est. RMD $40,000 (based on some online calculator)
Single
Approximate annual expenses (including taxes): $70,000
It seems I will have to pay tax on "up to 85% of SS income". Does that mean I add 85% of SS into AGI? What controls the "up to" part?
Assuming 85% SS taxed and $12,000 standard deduction, I calculate taxable income around $74,680, which is in the 22% bracket. Even if only 50% SS taxed, it would still be 22% bracket.
So, it would seem that once ACA is not a factor, and I can have AGI more than the $40,000 I limit it to now, doing ROTH conversions up to the top of the 22% bracket seems to not be lower than my expected RMD-time bracket.
Would converting to ROTH at 22% be advantageous if I planned to leave the money in the ROTH as long as possible, i.e. shielding the gains?
What about keeping AGI in the 12% bracket and selling appreciated equities with the 0% LTCG rate? 0% LTCG seems to save 15%, while ROTH saves 10% (i.e. 22% rate - 12% rate). Of course, that would limit the total amount I could play with. Maybe do ROTH one year and LTCG the next?
I suppose the unknown future tax rate would also influence the decision. I tend to lean towards tax rates increasing over time due to the fiscal mess our country is in.
Any input or correction to my initial calculations will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Joe
For the sake of argument, let's use the following:
Estimated annual SS: $40,800
Est. investment income: $12,000
Est. RMD $40,000 (based on some online calculator)
Single
Approximate annual expenses (including taxes): $70,000
It seems I will have to pay tax on "up to 85% of SS income". Does that mean I add 85% of SS into AGI? What controls the "up to" part?
Assuming 85% SS taxed and $12,000 standard deduction, I calculate taxable income around $74,680, which is in the 22% bracket. Even if only 50% SS taxed, it would still be 22% bracket.
So, it would seem that once ACA is not a factor, and I can have AGI more than the $40,000 I limit it to now, doing ROTH conversions up to the top of the 22% bracket seems to not be lower than my expected RMD-time bracket.
Would converting to ROTH at 22% be advantageous if I planned to leave the money in the ROTH as long as possible, i.e. shielding the gains?
What about keeping AGI in the 12% bracket and selling appreciated equities with the 0% LTCG rate? 0% LTCG seems to save 15%, while ROTH saves 10% (i.e. 22% rate - 12% rate). Of course, that would limit the total amount I could play with. Maybe do ROTH one year and LTCG the next?
I suppose the unknown future tax rate would also influence the decision. I tend to lean towards tax rates increasing over time due to the fiscal mess our country is in.
Any input or correction to my initial calculations will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Joe
Last edited: