Prior stock market predictions....

FREE866

Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Joined
Dec 9, 2016
Messages
1,854
Ben Carlson came out with this today.

As market followers I assume most of us remember these predictions. I certainly do. The permabears--Hussman, Schiff, etc have made a living off these as they are true carnival barkers. However, some of the other predictions are from very smart people that I once had respect for. The bear case ALWAYS SOUNDS more intelligent than the bull case I've noticed.

Check it out:

 
How about all the angst over Trump's tariff policies? Yes, the market dropped for about A WEEK, then recovered and came roaring back.

"Bill Ackman: Tariffs could spark an 'economic nuclear war'" — Business Insider (April 9, 2025)

"Trump tariffs slam markets, stunned investors brace for recession" — Reuters (April 3, 2025)
 
For a half century or more, academic research has shown that "random" is the most accurate characterization of the short-term (5 years) market. No one can predict random events. Noise Trader: Meaning, Technical Traders, Agenda

Long term, there is an upward bias, which is why buy-and-hold works.
 
Last edited:
How about all the angst over Trump's tariff policies? Yes, the market dropped for about A WEEK, then recovered and came roaring back.

"Bill Ackman: Tariffs could spark an 'economic nuclear war'" — Business Insider (April 9, 2025)

"Trump tariffs slam markets, stunned investors brace for recession" — Reuters (April 3, 2025)
I think that may be more a function of the way smart investors think about Trump than about dire predictions. TACO is real. Smart investors don't "react", they maintain status quo, let the naysayers and non-believers panic and then mop up gains from those results.
 
Not to mention the so called bond king's consistently wrong predictions.
 
In my early days of investing, in early 1988 after the market had started to recover from the crash, the local paper published a graph overlaying the 1987 crash and nascent recovery onto the 1929/1930 market action. Although not technically a prediction, the implication was obvious.

1771443307218.png
 
Warren Buffet has a great track record of hoarding cash, waiting for a crash, then buying low. Plus, how many times has any government predicted a recession? It is never in the 5, 10 or 20-year plans. There will always come a bear market, be ready.
 
If you’re truly diversified you’ll survive. On one the most brutal days on the markets my portfolios were down .2 percent thanks to my holdings. Like everyone 80% of my holdings were down today but a few were up. CVX,CVE,E,KR&PHYS these offset most of the losers today. You should have up to 20% of your portfolio in hard assets Ray Dalio
 
"US recessions have occurred, on average, roughly every 6 to 6.5 years since World War II. While 12 to 14 recessions have occurred since 1945, these economic downturns vary in frequency and severity, generally lasting about 10–11 months. They are considered a normal part of the business cycle"

That being said, have been out of the market for years. And sleep like a rock.
Main thing is to have a plan and stick to it. ;)
 
I learned to over the years, just stay invested through any market cycle. Eventually comes s back. Diversification to meet your needs (income, growth, balanced, etc) is real key long-term.
 
Last edited:
Software is the place to be now. I can't find a more beaten-down sector. "AI is going to kill software." Uh Uh.

>>The SaaSpocalypse isn’t the death of software. It’s the start of something much bigger.<<

>>we’ll see that AI is the best thing that ever happened to the software industry<<

>>code is never where the value has lived: if code is where the value was, these companies would have never gotten so big in the first place. They would have been killed years ago by open-source software or by competition from cheap software engineering labor in developing countries.<<

>> the world is still short software. We are nowhere near saturating the world’s demand for high-quality software. And as code becomes cheaper, we should just expect to see the market demand more.<<

Look at charts of MDB INYU WDAY ADBE NOW APP
 
"US recessions have occurred, on average, roughly every 6 to 6.5 years since World War II. While 12 to 14 recessions have occurred since 1945, these economic downturns vary in frequency and severity, generally lasting about 10–11 months. They are considered a normal part of the business cycle"

That being said, have been out of the market for years. And sleep like a rock.
Main thing is to have a plan and stick to it. ;)
If you have boatloads of money yes you don't need stock exposure. However, if you don't ( which is the majority of the population) the stock market is an excellent way to grow your money. People that stay out of the market have to work much longer than they would have had to if they had even had just a 60% allocation over the last 10-25 years.
 
If you have boatloads of money yes you don't need stock exposure. However, if you don't ( which is the majority of the population) the stock market is an excellent way to grow your money. People that stay out of the market have to work much longer than they would have had to if they had even had just a 60% allocation over the last 10-25 years.
Was in it for most of my life. Just no desire to continue. ;)
 
Was in it for most of my life. Just no desire to continue. ;)
If I may ask, how do you deploy your cash?

I've often thought of getting out of the markets, but they've been so good (until recently) that I've not pulled the trigger. Not sure what to do with the proceeds if I pull out.
 
If I may ask, how do you deploy your cash?

I've often thought of getting out of the markets, but they've been so good (until recently) that I've not pulled the trigger. Not sure what to do with the proceeds if I pull out.
The SP500 had 4 times a 20+% decline
Q4/2018
Q1/2020
2022
Q1/2025
I missed all of them.

You hardly ever find the following:

Timing the Market Pays Off When You Miss the Worst (and Best) Days (www.barrons.com/articles/timing-the-market-pays-off-buy-and-hold-51588186928)

So here’s the full truth, according to data from Ned Davis Research. From 1979 to mid-April of 2020, the S&P 500 Total Return Index gained 11.23% per annum. Sure, if you missed the best 40 days, returns shrunk to 5.21%. How about if you missed the worst 40 days? Nobody ever talks about that, because you’d be accused of market timing. Guess what? Your returns would soar to 18.83% annually. And importantly, if you missed both the best and the worst 40 days, you actually beat the market at 12.39%

Read the following (www.cambriainvestments.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Where-the-Black-Swans-Hide-the-10-Best-Days-Myth.pdf)

Conclusions:
1. The stock market historically has gone up about two-thirds of the time.
2. All of the stock market return occurs when the market is already uptrending.
3. The volatility is much higher when the market is declining.
4. Most of the best and worst days occur when the market is already declining because markets are much riskier than models assuming normal distributions predict.
5. The reason markets are more volatile when declining is because investors use a different part of their brain making money than when losing money.
 
I have been collecting bad predictions from top "experts" as a way to never listen to them and only trust myself.
Dr gloom Nouriel Roubini is a perma bear who missed the great stock performance of 1995-2000. He predicted accurately the 2008-9 debacle. He missed all the performance of 2010-2021.
=======================
Grantham + GMO is a special case for someone who was right prior to 2009, but is wrong since 2010.
2010 (link)
"Over the next seven years, GMO forecasts large-cap U.S. stocks to deliver a real return (after inflation) of 1.3% annually, while small-caps provide a 0.5% return."
"International stocks also fare reasonably well in GMO's model, up about 4.7%, while emerging markets come in with a 3.9% annualized gain."
FD: reality(link): SPY made 14.4%...IWM 11.9%...EEM 3%. One of the worse misses in the history of predictions.

10/2012 (www.forbes.com/sites/schifrin/2012/10/24/jeremy-grantham-warns-2013-will-be-a-dangerous-year-for-stocks/?sh=752ba4cc7010) Jeremy Grantham Warns 2013 Will Be A Dangerous Year For Stocks:
FD: The SP500 made over 32%

2013 (link) The S&P 500 is 75% Overvalued: GMO.....In a quarterly letter published on Monday, Ben Inker, co-head of global asset allocation at GMO said the expected rate of return on the stock market index is minus 1.3 percent per year, adjusted for inflation, for the next seven years.

2015 (link) GMO's Jeremy Grantham has a relatively gloomy outlook for the markets and economy.

FD: wrong again and again and again. Why anybody asks his opinion?
===============
Arnott the manager of PAUIX was pretty good until 2009 claiming he has the tools, research and knowledge to predict future performance + best categories. PAUIX made only 4.5% in the last 12 years while the SP500 made 15+%. See (link).

==================
Abby Joseph Cohen was a top dog at Goldman Sachs for years (link)
She is famous for predicting the bull market of the 1990s early in the decade, and was named Institutional Investor's top strategist in 1998 and 1999.[2] However, she developed a reputation as a so-called "perma-bull", receiving criticism for continued bullish predictions after March 2000 as the stock market entered a dramatic decline.[7]

Her reputation was further damaged when she failed to foresee the great Bear Market of 2008. In December 2007, she predicted the S&P 500 index would rally to 1,675 in 2008, the most optimistic of 14 Wall Street forecasters. The S&P 500 traded as low as 741 by November 2008, 56% below her prediction. On March 8, 2008, Goldman Sachs announced that Cohen was being replaced by David Kostin as the bank's chief forecaster for the U.S. stock market.[8]

==================
John Bogle, Vanguard founder, also used mean reversion for forecasts, but was proven wrong. In this 04/2013 (article)..."Look at it this way. If the dividend yield is 2 percent lower than the long-term return of 9 percent, we’ll drop to 7. It’s a deadweight loss, that dividend. So 7 percent is a pretty good return in this day and age, because bonds are yielding maybe 2, maybe 3 percent depending on your portfolio. So stocks are really a pretty good investment for the next 10 years.

Reality: Since 2013, the SP500 made 16+% annually.

==================
Vanguard predictions from 10 years ago 01/2012(link)...."Stock market returns. Centered in the 6%−9% return range"

Reality: The SP500 made over 16%

=====================
Prof Shiller created PE10(P/E over 10 years) which supposed to predict performance based on valuation better than PE
On 05/2012 (article)

Question: You have become famous for your cyclically adjusted 10-year price/earnings ratio. What do the latest numbers say about future stock market returns?

Shiller: we found a correlation between that ratio and the next 10 years' return.
If you plug in today's P/E of about 22, it would be predicting something like an annualized 4% return after inflation.

FD: reality, the SP500 made 13.6% in the next 10 years (04/31/2012-04/31/2022). Let's deduct the inflation and make it 11%. It is much better than countries with lower PE10 such as Emerging markets (link)
But wait, our "distinguish" prof completely failed. If he was off by 50%, maybe, the index did almost 3 more times than his prediction. I can't give him an F grade with a huge mistake like that, it should be lower. To be honest, Shiller should announce that CAPE is a complete failure.

===============

Michael Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief equity strategist

Dec 31 2018: Wilson 2019 predictions(link): S&P 500 (^GSPC) Michael Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief equity strategist, thinks stocks will continue struggling next year. Essentially going sideways. Reality: SP500 was up 31.5%.

January 2021 (www.cnbc.com/video/2021/01/27/mike-wilson-says-he-expects-a-correction-in-the-sp-500.html).
APR 26 2021(link): Time is ticking on a 10-20% market correction in the next 3 months.
June 8th 2021(link): There will be a 10% correction in the S&P 500 by the end of 2021.
JUL 19 2021 (link): Morgan Stanley says a 10% to 20% correction is ahead
Aug. 17, 2021,(link): Morgan Stanley's Mike Wilson said the S&P 500 could drop over 10% before the end of the year.
Nov 1, 2021 (link) "Mike Wilson sees growing odds of a 10% to 20% correction this quarter"
Dec 7 2021 (link) "I don't think we are out of the woods". Reality: Wilson predicted at least 6 times for a correction. The SP500 made 28.7% in 2021 with no 10-20% correction.

FD: Reality for 2021: Michael Wilson doesn't have a clue because he keeps saying the same thing for a year. How come he still has a job after so many bad calls?

12-21-2022 (markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/sp-500-bear-market-stocks-morgan-stanley-mike-wilson-2022-11) "You're going to make a new low some time in the first quarter, and that will be a terrific buying opportunity," the bank's CIO Mike Wilson said in an interview with CNBC."
FD: the SP500 made about 8% in Q1/2023, then kept going up and made close to 17% in the first 6 months of the year.
=====================
Tom Lee is another perma bull, just like Siegel, eventually bulls are always right, because the SP500 is up about 80% since 1980. There is no magic here.

Listen to Tom Lee (link) on 2-25-2020. The market is buyable here. The SP500 went down another 30%.

April 1 2022(link) "Fundstrat’s Tom Lee says the lows for 2022 are in, calls for a full risk-on rally in second half"
Reality: 2.5 months later, the SP500 was down 20%

Aug 9 2022(video) "there was capitulation in June...the bottom is in".
Reality: the SP500 was down another 13% from Aug 09. And the bottom of 10/2022 was lower than 06/2022.

This is how you do it. You keep saying the bull is in months ahead, if the bull comes early, you claim, it's OK, it just came earlier. If the market goes down after you said it, you claim it will be up months ahead.

But, Tom Lee is an "expert" about everything.
Dec 29 2021 (link): 'Fundstrat’s Tom Lee Can See Bitcoin Price Hitting $200K in 2022"
Reality: bitcoin fell from 46K to under 17K.

=======================
Gundlach
FEB 2022([www.cnbc.com/2022/02/11/jeffrey-gundlach-says-the-fed-is-obviously-behind-the-curve-will-raise-rates-more-than-expected.html)
"Gundlach sees the 10-year Treasury yield...to exceed 2.5% this year. He also said, “It’s possible the 10-year takes a peek at 3%.”

Reality: the 10 year peeked at 4.2%
====================
MAR 16 2022 (www.cnbc.com/video/2022/03/16/the-fed-is-way-behind-says-doubleline-ceo.html)
G: stocks will go higher from here

Reality: The SP500 fell about 17% by 07/2022.

==================

August 26, 2021(www.nasdaq.com/articles/bond-king-sees-gold-pushing-higher-from-its-current-price-2021-08-26) "The dollar going down"
Reality: the Dollar went up from 08/2021 to 09/2022 by about 25%, which is a huge move.
==================

Gundlach predictions for 2019 (www.fa-mag.com/news/how-jeffrey-gundlach-s-predictions-for-2019-turned-out-53478.html)
EM should out perform. Reality: they under performed
Stocks are value trap. Reality: 2019 was a great year for stocks, the SP500 made over 28%.
The dollar would probably weaken. It was flat
==================

Gundlach, the king (without cloths) of bonds, predicted in 2016 that the 10 year treasury to be 6% by 2021, see (www.barrons.com/articles/gundlach-bond-yields-could-hit-6-in-five-years-1478929496) and again in 2018(www.cnbc.com/2018/09/20/doublelines-gundlach-warns-us-treasury-yields-are-headed-higher.html).

Reality: On 12-31-2021 it was at about 1.5%
 
Ben Carlson came out with this today.

As market followers I assume most of us remember these predictions. I certainly do. The permabears--Hussman, Schiff, etc have made a living off these as they are true carnival barkers. However, some of the other predictions are from very smart people that I once had respect for. The bear case ALWAYS SOUNDS more intelligent than the bull case I've noticed.

Check it out:

It’s a yearly misnomer. It should be projection not prediction.

How about odds favor the stock market will end up or down from last year (not exactly even) to what degree is an unknown.

Unless you’re now personally present for the end of humanity, long term equity values should be up due to inflation and (uneven) earnings. The definition of long term individually varies and is unknown.

At some point once you feel your continued survival is in question it may become better to invest in IOU’s, bonds, for the more easily to project unknown income, why wait. And on and on…..

This is why I just set up a monthly auto transferred paycheck (with checking) and resulting savings account like I had when I worked. I had the required retirement skills already. I still just only deal with my personal knowns and unknowns as they present themselves. Just spend reasonably because you never know what lies ahead.*

*the definition of reasonably may vary. 😁
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom