marko
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,042
Here's an interesting excerpt/perspective (bolds mine) from the "receiver's" point of view via The Heirs Journal:
"Growing up with a wealthy father, I've come to realize a bitter truth: the fortune that's supposed to provide security often becomes a barrier to genuine relationships, especially with our parents.
My relationship with my father is a perfect example of this paradox.
On paper, we have it all—financial stability, endless opportunities, the luxury of choice.
But dig a little deeper, and you'll find a relationship stuck in time, unable to grow beyond the roles of provider and dependent.
The flow of money from his accounts to mine reinforces an unspoken message:
I'm in my 30s but he can’t help but see me as "his little boy."
This financial umbilical cord, while well-intentioned, has become a chain that keeps our relationship from maturing into one between equals.
These fathers, driven by love and a desire to provide, end up creating a dynamic where money becomes a poor substitute for real emotional bonds.
What should be relationships built on love and respect become tangled webs of financial dependency and unspoken fears.
For us heirs, the consequences are both profound and demeaning.
Many of us end up as modern-day court jesters to our fathers' financial kings. We feel constant pressure to please, to not rock the boat. Every interaction carries the unspoken threat of falling out of favor with the all-important provider.
This leads to a pitiful charade that eats away at the very foundation of family love.
Our fathers might convince themselves that our compliance means family harmony, ignoring the strain underlying every interaction.
Both sides engage in an elaborate dance of false affection, choreographed by the silent conductor of financial dependency.
The result is a relationship built on sand. "
"Growing up with a wealthy father, I've come to realize a bitter truth: the fortune that's supposed to provide security often becomes a barrier to genuine relationships, especially with our parents.
My relationship with my father is a perfect example of this paradox.
On paper, we have it all—financial stability, endless opportunities, the luxury of choice.
But dig a little deeper, and you'll find a relationship stuck in time, unable to grow beyond the roles of provider and dependent.
The flow of money from his accounts to mine reinforces an unspoken message:
I'm in my 30s but he can’t help but see me as "his little boy."
This financial umbilical cord, while well-intentioned, has become a chain that keeps our relationship from maturing into one between equals.
These fathers, driven by love and a desire to provide, end up creating a dynamic where money becomes a poor substitute for real emotional bonds.
What should be relationships built on love and respect become tangled webs of financial dependency and unspoken fears.
For us heirs, the consequences are both profound and demeaning.
Many of us end up as modern-day court jesters to our fathers' financial kings. We feel constant pressure to please, to not rock the boat. Every interaction carries the unspoken threat of falling out of favor with the all-important provider.
This leads to a pitiful charade that eats away at the very foundation of family love.
Our fathers might convince themselves that our compliance means family harmony, ignoring the strain underlying every interaction.
Both sides engage in an elaborate dance of false affection, choreographed by the silent conductor of financial dependency.
The result is a relationship built on sand. "
Last edited: