Space - The Final Frontier

They are very curious and playful animals. Some of my fondest memories of being a Navy submariner are of our interactions with the dolphins.
 
When I first saw the video of the splashdown, I thought it was an AI generated clip. It was absolutely stunning beautiful, the four chutes, capsule against the light blue sky and dark blue gulf.
 
frayne said:
When I first saw the video of the splashdown, I thought it was an AI generated clip. It was absolutely stunning beautiful, the four chutes, capsule against the light blue sky and dark blue gulf.
Click to expand...
The pod of dolphins showing up to welcome the astronauts home was a nice touch. I wonder who arranged that! :cool:
 
dixonge said:
well, whomever is running this simulation, obviously...:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Always have thought how cool and shocking to be walking along, looking up at the sky, and for a second or two, see a tree, then a blank square, then back to clouds.
 

SpaceX sets rocket re-use record Friday with a nine-day turnaround​


"""March 21 (UPI) -- SpaceX has set a rocket re-use record for launch-turnaround by sending a Falcon 9 up twice within nine days early Friday morning. The previous record was 14 days."""
 
This interview with a Starliner astronaut does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling though it starts well.

If you have the time, I recommend skipping the parts I quoted and reading the entire article.

arstechnica.com

Starliner’s flight to the space station was far wilder than most of us thought

“Hey, this is a very precarious situation we’re in.”…
arstechnica.com arstechnica.com
After Starliner separated from the Atlas V rocket, Williams and Wilmore performed several maneuvering tests and put the vehicle through its paces. Starliner performed exceptionally well during these initial tests on day one.
Click to expand...
But things turned sour:
Wilmore: "As we get closer to the V-bar, we lose our second thruster. So now we're single fault tolerance for the loss of 6DOF control. You understand that?"
Click to expand...
Here things get a little more complicated if you've never piloted anything. When Wilmore refers to 6DOF control, he means six degrees of freedom—that is, the six different movements possible in three-dimensional space: forward/back, up/down, left/right, yaw, pitch, and roll. With Starliner's four doghouses and their various thrusters, a pilot is able to control the spacecraft's movement across these six degrees of freedom. But as Starliner got to within a few hundred meters of the station, a second thruster failed. The condition of being "single fault" tolerant means that the vehicle could sustain just one more thruster failure before being at risk of losing full control of Starliner's movement. This would necessitate a mandatory abort of the docking attempt.
Click to expand...

Wilmore: "We're single fault tolerant, and I'm thinking, 'Wow, we're supposed to leave the space station.' Because I know the flight rules. I did not know that the flight directors were already in discussions about waiving the flight rule because we've lost two thrusters. We didn't know why. They just dropped."
Click to expand...

Williams: "There was a lot of unsaid communication, like, 'Hey, this is a very precarious situation we're in.' I think both of us overwhelmingly felt like it would be really nice to dock to that space station that's right in front of us. We knew that they [Mission Control] were working really hard to be able to keep communication with us, and then be able to send commands. We were both thinking, what if we lose communication with the ground? So NORDO Con Ops (this means flying a vehicle without a radio), and we didn't talk about it too much, but we already had synced in our mind that we should go to the space station. This is our place that we need to probably go to, to have a conversation because we don't know exactly what is happening, why the thrusters are falling off, and what the solution would be."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
^^^^^^^

Thanks for sharing. Great interview. Yeah, sounds like it was worse than we ever heard.
 
Well, the capsule made it down safely without them, so it wasn't as bad as they feared. But yeah, it was the right decision to stay.

I'm still in favor of multiple US-based options to space. A monopoly, be it government or private, is never a good thing long-term. I still hope Boeing (or whoever buys the Starliner project from them) succeeds. And some of the others in that race.
 
Koolau said:
^^^^^^^

Thanks for sharing. Great interview. Yeah, sounds like it was worse than we ever heard.
Click to expand...
Indeed.

One interesting part of the interview was the comments on how the ground team experts really shined in getting the Starliner safely to the ISS, and eventually back to Earth,
 
CaptTom said:
Well, the capsule made it down safely without them, so it wasn't as bad as they feared. But yeah, it was the right decision to stay.

I'm still in favor of multiple US-based options to space. A monopoly, be it government or private, is never a good thing long-term. I still hope Boeing (or whoever buys the Starliner project from them) succeeds. And some of the others in that race.
Click to expand...
Hear, hear!

We should never again be dependent on any other country - especially an adversary - for space travel.
 
That Ars Technica article was a great read. Honestly, some heads need to roll in the Boeing Starliner program. As the article imputed, the thruster thing was a known issue and still wasn't rectified.
It could easily have killed both astronauts. Possibly also had the capsule careen into the station or out into space.
I know space is hard but at some point, the buck has to stop....
 
Here’s some news regarding Boeing’s Starliner.

spacenews.com

Boeing reports progress on containing Starliner costs

Boeing executives said the company is making progress on containing the costs of its CST-100 Starliner commercial crew vehicle, but offered few details on technical work.
spacenews.com spacenews.com

He did state that NASA and Boeing continue to study the Starliner anomalies from the CFT mission, with that work planned to continue into the summer. That work includes several teams looking into why those problems were not detected in earlier in design and development of the spacecraft or in analysis from its two previous uncrewed flights.”
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Texas Proud said:
Have not read the article but why would something sent to Venus ever come back to Earth?
Click to expand...
Maybe thge Russians could not accutartely calculate the planet positions back then, missed Venus, went around the sun and are now returning. Or maybe aliens are returning V''ger :)
 
More good news from Voyager 1. The team was able to resurrect roll thrusters that they thought had failed back in 2004. Now the spacecraft will be able to maintain proper orientation while the Earth-based antenna (in Canberra, Australia) used to communicate with the craft is down for maintenance and upgrade. Pretty amazing engineering.

 
^^^^^^^

The gift that keeps on giving!

I wonder if the car companies could learn a thing or three from the folks that built V-Ger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2HOTinPHX
Chatgtp helps me plan a trip to Mars and a sequel to The Martian all in one chat!
Fermion
F
TromboneAl
Pls Check This ISS Scene for Authenticity
TromboneAl
TromboneAl
T
Space Shuttle again
MuirWannabe
MuirWannabe
Nords
Letter to my daughter about Grandpa
omni550
O
Nords
Look dude, there goes the space station!
Nords
Nords

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom