I had a conversation about umbrella insurance with a rich friend recently. It's bothering me a little, and I wanted to bounce if off y'all. I'm kinda hoping this isn't how it works.
Me: "I heard that a $2M umbrella policy is large enough for almost anyone, because the insurance company will send their lawyers to fight to avoid paying out that much money, regardless of your portfolio size."
Friend: "That's bad advice. Let's say you cause a car accident where someone loses a finger, or a hand, or a leg. The legal world has somewhat pre-determined rates for such injuries, e.g. a hand is worth $5M**. If you have a $2M policy but caused a 'known' $5M injury, they won't fight it because they know it would be near impossible to get "a lost hand" down below $2M. So they write the $2M check and walk away. You're still on the hook for the remaining $3M."
Me: "So if I have $5M, then I should get a $5M umbrella?"
Friend: "Yes. I know this because I have a teenage daughter who caused a car accident where the other person got hurt."
Me: "But let's say I have $5M and I have a $5M umbrella. Under your scenario, I'm still at risk if I cause an accident (death?) that's 'known' to be worth $10M? They pay the $5M and walk away. I'll still be sued for the other half."
Friend: "Probably, yes. Well, you'd have to get your own lawyer to fight it."
** P.S. I don't actually remember if it was a *hand* that was worth $5M or $2M, or something else. I don't think it's important.
(I'm also wondering how lawyers can find out how much money I have. They might assume if I have a $5M umbrella policy, then I must have $5M.)