With markets higher than any time in history

Invest when you have money, withdraw when you need it. It's just that simple.
 
I will rebalance a bit to 60/40. I'm now 68/32. 20% - 60% Tariffs will cause some turbulence. But it's not just tariffs, deporting 10-20 million will cause problems in the labor market for farms and agriculture. Expecting food prices going up.
 
My plan (still accumulating) is to work harder, trying to earn MORE capital during bust economies so I can put more powder in the canon's when I reload at the bottom or dips. Again, every 5% dip I will just buy more.

I realize for those done accumulating cannot execute this strategy.

I am 100% equities, so I basically just keep buying more high TECH and AAPL. I guess that what I am saying is my strategy is to "Stay the coarse!"

Even though its a bit different allocation than many in the forum, its still my individual investment plan and why would I change it.
 
Some great discussion and deviations are good it brings up good conversation and different angles.

In the 48 years of being in the markets I have always bought, and I have never sold one share to this day. I haven't bought now for a few years but I don't see the purpose for me to buy but I'm still holding and never have sold.


Nothing changes I will ride out the bad times that are on the horizon because we all know the bear markets are coming.
 
In the 48 years of being in the markets I have always bought, and I have never sold one share to this day. I haven't bought now for a few years but I don't see the purpose for me to buy but I'm still holding and never have sold.

That seems to be an over-simplification. I periodically weed out underperformers; yesterday when I sold I did the opposite and took some profit off the table on investments that had out-performed. Heck, if I never sold anything I'd be holding onto the shares of Republic Steel (Dad's employer at the time) that I bought in college!

Totally agree on your mostly "buy and hold" tactic, though.
 
What precisely do you mean by "different govt. system" ? (Emphasis mine.) As I understand that term, such a change would require a bloody revolution or a Constitiutional Convention. I doubt the markets would favor either of those.
I mean system by this definition "a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized framework or method." I don't think that would require a bloody revolution. Corporations do it all the time. I'll leave it at that. No further discussion needed.
 
Waiting for a company to completely implode for a full value write-off .; as compared to write-downs while it slowly dies..the tax result would be the same, wouldn't it?

(Aside from giving you some timing control of when to write-down)

pwf
 
Back
Top Bottom