In the traffic engineering business, we have the saying "everyone with a drivers' license thinks they are a traffic engineer".
It's cynical, of course, but is based on the reality that there are extra challenge for those civil engineers who practice in the transportation field. If the OP had posted information on new, efficient and innovative techniques for water distribution, for example, a similar number of us might be affected but there would be crickets for responses.
Heck, good traffic engineering is even a mystery to many in my own field. A BSCE typically requires a single semester of transportation engineering. More than once I been presented a set of plans for a street reconstruction that ignored the challenges drivers might have when running into the "wrong" side of a signalized intersection during the period when traffic is switched to the other side of the street. "Yea, I see what you mean Harry, but the limits of our project are on the south side of the intersection."
Comments so far pointing out the downside of the extra land required for some of these innovative intersection designs are spot on. It's not at all unusual in urban street projects for the costs of land acquisition and the relocation of existing utilities to exceed the actual road construction cost you see on the construction signs.