Do we have a Higgs sighting?

LOL! said:
C'mon, airplanes and rockets had practical value from the get-go. I am not saying that basic science has no place in the world. I am a scientist. Most scientists have learned to justify what they do by how it benefits mankind even if only in a peripheral way. They would not get the money to do what they if they could not write a justification. These Higgs boson folks have not done that at all.

NPR has a Q&A with this:
Click to expand...
A counter-counter point: is the money spent on the LHC really wasted? Didn't it provide smart people with useful jobs? Won't that money just be quickly recycled back into the community to flow into other perhaps more tangible activities -- supermarkets, retailers, equipment manufacturers, etc?

I suspect that the people being paid from this project are spending a high percentage of their salaries as opposed to just investing.

Perhaps our economic models are even murkier then the physics models.
 
Lsbcal said:
A counter-counter point: is the money spent on the LHC really wasted? Didn't it provide smart people with useful jobs? Won't that money just be quickly recycled back into the community to flow into other perhaps more tangible activities -- supermarkets, retailers, equipment manufacturers, etc?

I suspect that the people being paid from this project are spending a high percentage of their salaries as opposed to just investing.

Perhaps our economic models are even murkier then the physics models.
Click to expand...
Yes, I alluded to this already: "(I realize there is a trickle-down jobs effect: construction workers, administrateive assistants, journalists, advertising agencies, etc)."

I do sit on a scientific advisory committee for a large-physics project. I must say that this project would get no money if the physicists simply said, "It's important." Instead, they have to demonstrate ahead of time that the results have a high probability of leading to better treatment of human afflictions and diseases.

It does gall me that we get reports like this from NPR:

Scientists have discovered a new subatomic particle with profound implications for understanding our universe.
Click to expand...
with absolutely no support for such a statement. C'mon, if this stuff is really important they should be able to come up with something. So far though: Nothing.

(OK, MooreBonds has added some context which is more than any journalist has done. That Bloomberg article linked is more of the "It's important because it's important" genre. Such an argument would result in loss-of-funding for the projects I am involved in.)

Also this from BBC News:

The CMS team claimed they had seen a "bump" in their data corresponding to a particle weighing in at 125.3 gigaelectronvolts (GeV) - about 133 times heavier than the protons that lie at the heart of every atom.


The BBC's George Alagiah explains the Higgs boson
They claimed that by combining two data sets, they had attained a confidence level just at the "five-sigma" point - about a one-in-3.5 million chance that the signal they see would appear if there were no Higgs particle.

However, a full combination of the CMS data brings that number just back to 4.9 sigma - a one-in-two million chance.
Click to expand...
Oh, look! If they ignore some data, they get 5 sigma. If they include all the data, "back to 4.9 sigma". What's up with that?
 
Last edited:
I don't think any discovery is unimportant, whether it's immediately significant or long range. I'm interested in the "god" particle and if it can explain the beginning of the universe and whether it involves God or not. This could be an interesting outcome. I'll have to admit that I know nothing about this physics discovery but I want to learn. Maybe it's just like the space program. I can't believe all I learned because of the space program and maybe this could be a sequel.
 
LOL! said:
I have to rant.

Let's face it, this particle is a big jobs project for physicists (full disclosure: I am a member of the American Institute of Physics)....
Click to expand...

This is the sort of thing that separates the spirit associated with science from the spirit of an engineer.

You sound like an engineer. I mean this as a complement. I agree that one should I question the cost / benefit ratio of this relative to other scientific research. I am glad that you did it and not me!
 
LOL! said:
That Bloomberg article linked is more of the "It's important because it's important" genre. Such an argument would result in loss-of-funding for the projects I am involved in.)
Click to expand...

You really don't think the article details why it's important?
(from the aforementioned linked article, emphasis mine)
Physicist Peter Higgs proposed what we now call the Higgs field, and hypothesized that it spreads through the universe. All particles would acquire mass by interacting with this field. As is the case with the other interactions, at a quantum level this Higgs interaction predicts that we should be able to produce and detect the boson associated with it, or the Higgs boson.
Mass of the particles would be the result of interaction with the Higgs field, and this interaction produces a Higgs boson. Because the boson is predicted by the field, finding the Higgs boson would be evidence that the Higgs field exists.
Click to expand...
It's looking like there's a field that permeates the entire universe, and this special field gives everything the property of mass....and, as a physicist, you don't understand the potential significance? Would you have the same opinion today of a fundamental, universal field that controls how particles with certain charges behave and interact with things in the universe?

Imagine if, someday, we learn how to tap into, divert, or learn to otherwise interact with the Higgs field...just as we have since learned to harness and utilize other 'fields' that have been discovered in the past:

[FONT=arial, helvetica, geneva][SIZE=-1]Much of modern technology has been developed from the basic principles of electromagnetism formulated by Maxwell. The field of electronics, including the telephone, radio, television, and radar, stem from his discoveries and formulations. While Maxwell relied heavily on previous discoveries about electricity and magnetism, he also made a significant leap in unifying the theories of magnetism, electricity, and light. His revolutionary work lead to the development of quantum physics in the early 1900's and to Einstein's theory of relativity.[/SIZE][/FONT]
Click to expand...
Imagine if we could somehow alter an object's mass through its interaction with the Higgs field? Or interact with the Higgs field in some other way, just as thousands of technologies interact and utilize the properties of electromagnetic waves/light?

Remember that oft-cited equation of E=mc^2? Starting to see how things might one day be impacted by, perhaps, altering an object's effective mass?

When something helps create a true theory (such as when Maxwell united magnetism, electricity and light), you can then use those theories and equations to predict how things will act in certain situations. And when you can do that, you can then figure out how to harness that knowledge to create new things. As you might have noticed from some of the inventions over the past 100 years - some of them taking a full century before technology was able to reach the stage of being able to advance an idea to experimentation.
 
Last edited:
I smell entanglement, all your thoughts are really out there.


“Out beyond the world of ideas of wrong doing and right doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.”
Rumi
 
Watched a mention of this on the evening news.

Got excited when a physicists was mentioning the possibilty of multi-universes. Then I started thinking, in another universe there's probably a me still plugging away at his j*b and not FIRE'd...Made the thought not so exciting...:LOL:
 
Well, this Scientific American piece purports to answer LOL's question but really just seems to say it is important because it is important:
What It Means to Find (a Higgs Boson).
MooreBonds should have been queried, he gives a better answer. :)
 
The Higgs Boson walks into a church.
The Priest says "We don't allow Higgs Bosons in here."
The Higgs Boson says "But without Me, how can you have Mass?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Qs Laptop
Do You Have a Mini PC? Looking for Feedback...
2
Replies
26
Views
771
Qs Laptop
Qs Laptop
M
Travel Tips from a trip to Greece
Replies
17
Views
1K
brett
B
easysurfer
I Need a Newer GPS ... or Do I?
2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
4K
tulak
T
ls99
Blow Everyone else's Dough
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Mdlerth
Mdlerth
F
I've come a long way and have my sights set on FIRE
Replies
18
Views
3K
FIREflower
F

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom