France LOWERS retirement age for some (60)

Lived in France for several years.

Not only an age 60 retirement, but between the 35 hour work week, a "saint's day" every other week, some civil holiday every alternate week and a rail/taxi/muni/police/carman's strike every third week, plus six weeks of vacation, you end up working a 3 day week year 'round!

Oh yeah, and that 2 hour lunch (paid by law by your company).

But who's to say that WE don't have it wrong?! It's not a bad lifestyle (until the money runs out)
 
Last edited:
But who's to say that WE don't have it wrong?

How about the fact that they're all going bankrupt?

Bailouts already given to Ireland, Greece, Portugal, and now Spain. Who's next? "Place your bets! Will it be Italy or France! Step right up, place your bets!"

I'd say that's a pretty good indication that THEY'VE got it wrong. Turns out if you overpay a population to underproduce and loaf around, the money eventually DOES run out.
 
Turns out if you overpay a population to underproduce and loaf around, the money eventually DOES run out.

Agreed. I did say 'until the money runs out'

"Paying a population to underproduce and loaf around" is rapidly becoming an applicable policy here the US as well, I'd say.

Who is John Galt?
 
Just on a cultural level the French are complex and not easily understood by Americans. Now we throw in economic variables on national and international levels. How to model this and be close to right in our thinking?

It just happens that I'm reading this book: Amazon.com: Sixty Million Frenchmen Can't Be Wrong: Why We Love France but Not the French (9781402200458): Jean-Benoit Nadeau, Julie Barlow: Books

Still puzzling about the French and Europe in general. But then I don't understand the Russians, Chinese, etc. Then there are those bewildering Americans. ;)
 
Just on a cultural level the French are complex and not easily understood by Americans. Now we throw in economic variables on national and international levels. How to model this and be close to right in our thinking?
I'm glad you posted this.

Since I worked for a French company (I was based in the U.S.) but had a French manager (and a French group that I managed, along with folks in the U.S.), I know that on the surface, a lot of the "press" seems strange to us in the U.S.

I won't go into the reasons behind the news article (which discount those who persue higher education - university and beyond, in France which greatly expands their "normal retirement age") nor the assumtions of the 35-hour work week (which in most cases, resulted in 5/hours per week in overtime to bring most folks up to the 40-hour week, as requried due to workloads).

I also won't talk about the less than an hour lunch break (of which I was never "paid") I took with my manager/group, or the idea that my manager required me to report by 8 am and often work to 7 pm (the time that most resturants opened) during my monthly trips to the "home country" of my employment.

Oh, BTW. Since I was responsible for the wages of my French (along with U.S.) employees, I was certainly aware that that the folks who were on the "other side of the pond" were paid much less than the folks that reported to me on the U.S. side for the same job/duties.

Anything that hits the news has to be measured for comparison based upon the knowledge of the local situation.
 
I used to work for a Belgian company that was certainly full of Frenchmen. At various times I had Belgiun bosses and always had to deal with them on my work.

The Belgians were definitely paid less than the Americans in similar postions. Americans moved to Belgium quickly learned this because they were paid like they were Belgian. That definitely created problems getting people to go with families. Singles loved it.

It was repeatedly made clear to me that they didn't understand us and we didn't understand them. They did elevate beauracracy to a new level even compared to my prior US mega-corp experience.

I saw one meeting where a Belgian French speaking group and a German German speaking group had a meeting. Everyone worked for the company. I knew all of the Belgians spoke German. I knew that most (probably all) the Germans spoke French. They would rather have died than speak the other groups language. The meeting was done in English.

The cost of living is very high in France. How people buy houses is completely beyond me. It's like California circa 2007 on steroids.
 
Last edited:
Gender discrimination and discrimination based on reproductive status. Lovely.
It's very common and accepted in Europe. When I was reading the want ads in a Belgian paper I found one that said "Attractive woman under 25 years old for customer reception position. Must have good office software skills. Prefer non-married." Imagine what would happen if this ran in a US paper.

They wanted a "babe" to give the clients coming into the office something to look forward to seeing.
 
Gender discrimination and discrimination based on reproductive status. Lovely.

No. French people recognize that women are still the ones bearing kids and most likely raising them as well. What it means is that a woman tends to be penalized by the French retirement system compared to their male counterparts because she may have to time time off work. Therefore, women who have had children get compensated with retirement credits.

Would you be OK if -all else being equal- the woman who bore your kids had to work longer or get a lower pension than you just because you got her pregnant? I wouldn't.
 
No. French people recognize that women are still the ones bearing kids and most likely raising them as well. What it means is that a woman tends to be penalized by the French retirement system compared to their male counterparts because she may have to time time off work. Therefore, women who have had children get compensated with retirement credits.

Would you be OK if -all else being equal- the woman who bore your kids had to work longer or get a lower pension than you just because you got her pregnant? I wouldn't.
There's a big difference between giving "service credits" toward an old age pension system and letting them get out earlier than everyone else. Your argument is speaking toward the "service credits" aspect of it, not the discriminatory difference in eligibility age to retire.

But at the same time, a stay-at-home dad is screwed? Same situation, but reverse the genders and he's SOL? When are we going to get past the "men as breadwinners and wallet" stereotype? Women are far, far ahead of men in terms of being allowed to move past the traditional stereotypes, and this just reinforces it. Base it on personal situation, not gender, then it's not sexism and gender discrimination.

Jeez, I thought this was the 21st Century...
 
Last edited:
There's a big difference between giving "service credits" toward an old age pension system and letting them get out earlier than everyone else.

But at the same time, a stay-at-home dad is screwed? Same situation, but reverse the genders and he's SOL? When are we going to get past the "men as breadwinners and wallet" stereotype? Women are far, far ahead of men in terms of being allowed to move past the stereotypes.

The French retirement system is complex and very different from the US system. People should at least attempt to understand it before making judgements.
 
As a % of GDP, the French budget deficit is lower than the US's. Their public debt is about the same. Their productivity per hour is the same if not better.

American friends who held jobs in France worked 40 hrs/week but received comp time for the extra. This meant an extra 1/2 day of vacation earned each week. Add that to their 4-6 week vacation and it sounds like a job where I wouldn't have to seek ER.
 
Their productivity per hour is the same if not better.
Nope. Link (according to a CBS turn of a UN report in Feb 2009.)
American workers . . . also get more done per hour than everyone but the Norwegians, according to a U.N. report released Monday, which said the United States "leads the world in labor productivity."
 
But at the same time, a stay-at-home dad is screwed?
BTW, I also w*rked for a company owned by the Swede's. In that country, both parents get paid time off (shared) to care for a young child for 16 months.

Think they are abnormal? Well, here's a list of parental leave, by country (to make it easy):

Parental leave - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of course, I would not want to pay the taxes my manager (who lived in Sweden) did either, but that's another story.
 
Last edited:
The French retirement system is complex and very different from the US system. People should at least attempt to understand it before making judgements.
It may be complex, but *if* a certain "protected class" gets to retire younger than all the other French taxpayers, it's discriminatory. Especially if it's based on gender (or race or religion or family status, et cetera). I don't need to know more than that to judge that particular aspect of it as sexist, discriminatory and wrong.

There are ways to consider individual circumstances and other criteria without a dividing line based on gender.
 
Last edited:
It may be complex, but *if* a certain "protected class" gets to retire younger than all the other French taxpayers, it's discriminatory.
In this case, the "protected class" is the uneducated (beyond high school).

It works out that everybody puts in the same number of years "on the j*b", but for those in the lower class (who's lifestyle is also much lower, overall) they get a bit more years of lower class retirement, since they enter the w*rkforce at a much younger age.

Is it proper? Not in our eyes. Of course, in France the social system is set up that you generally "are what your father was", be it the head of the government or a street cleaner. There is definitely a class system, which most folks don't understand and the ability to break out of your class is difficult.

Most folk who were raised/lived in this country would not understand nor want such a "system".
 
Last edited:
Let's reserve judgement and see how the increased social spending works out for them. They are free to make their decisions (as they did with their recent election) and enjoy the consequences.

But, I hope those in the US will resist the urge to bail France out "for our own good." Those US workers toiling extra weeks every year and being more productive (on average) each hour they spend on the job might not take it well.
 
Nope. Link (according to a CBS turn of a UN report in Feb 2009.)

Fair enough. They're about 98.5% as productive as Americans, according to that study.

The U.S. is second at $35.63, about a half-dollar ahead of third-placed France.

(And we should note that this is an inexact "science." Norway's numbers are skewed because of the oil boom, which greatly increases GDP/capita in a smaller country.)
 
It's very common and accepted in Europe. When I was reading the want ads in a Belgian paper I found one that said "Attractive woman under 25 years old for customer reception position. Must have good office software skills. Prefer non-married." Imagine what would happen if this ran in a US paper.

They wanted a "babe" to give the clients coming into the office something to look forward to seeing.
In South America they also would require a recent photo along with the CV. My YW gets offers on the 11 out of six positions she applies for!
 
ziggy29 said:
It may be complex, but *if* a certain "protected class" gets to retire younger than all the other French taxpayers, it's discriminatory. Especially if it's based on gender (or race or religion or family status, et cetera). I don't need to know more than that to judge that particular aspect of it as sexist, discriminatory and wrong.

There are ways to consider individual circumstances and other criteria without a dividing line based on gender.

One can retire at age 60 if one has at least 40 years in the workforce, that is, started work before the age of 20. The retirement pay is discounted compared to retiring at the full retirement age (67), by what looks like a straightforward actuarial calculation, something like the US Social Security system. Note that Social Security only requires 40 quarters of creditable earnings, something vaguely like 10 years of significant work.
 
In South America they also would require a recent photo along with the CV. My YW gets offers on the 11 out of six positions she applies for!
It's funny, because most employers in Latin America do ask for a current photo, yet hiring is often more diverse with regard to age and gender that in the US, especially professional positions.
 
Lived in France for several years.

Not only an age 60 retirement, but between the 35 hour work week, a "saint's day" every other week, some civil holiday every alternate week and a rail/taxi/muni/police/carman's strike every third week, plus six weeks of vacation, you end up working a 3 day week year 'round!

Oh yeah, and that 2 hour lunch (paid by law by your company).
You must have lived in a different place called France from the one I live in.

Retirement at 60 is only possible if you've worked for 42 years straight. The "new" reduction to 60 from 62 does not reverse most of the changes made by the previous government; to qualify, you have to have had almost no breaks of any kind. And in any case, this is not the full rate; you have to wait until 65 for that (a bit like US Social Security). To go at 60, you have to have saved quite a bit, FIRE-style, and until very recently there was no 401(k)-style tax deduction for that; your personal retirement contributions were paid out of taxed income, and even getting the returns tax-free (Roth-style) means accepting some conditions.

It's a Saint's days almost every day of the year, courtesy of the Catholic calendar. However, a total of 0 (zero) Saint's days are recognised as public holidays in France. (Several French holidays are indeed Christian religious festivals; these were abolished after the 1789 revolution and quietly snuck back in during the period from 1815 through 1871 when the French brought the monarchy back. They don't like to talk about this period very much; for example, it is skated over very quickly in school history lessons. Anyway, when 1871 came around, they were apparently so tired from losing a war to the Prussians that they never re-secularized the holiday calendar.)

France actually has no more holidays than the US, once you take into account that Whit Monday is not really a holiday (it's a very long and complicated story, involving politicians).

And there is no employer-paid lunch break. If you work a 35-hour week, you typically work from 9:00-12:00 or 12:30 and then 2pm to 5:30pm or 6pm. Lunchtime is your own. Many workers go home, but others sit at their desk like people all over the world. (The most common consequence of the 35-hour week was for people to work 8-hour days or even slightly more, then either go home on Friday afternoon, or take an occasional extra day off. Mothers will often typically go home on a Wednesday afternoon, since most kids have no school then - elementary schools are typically shut all day Wednesday. (This *is* a secular thing; in pre-revolutionary France, schools used to be closed on Thursday for catechism practice, so the revolutionaries kept that idea, but moved that to another day and made it about recreation. French kids need this break; they work their butts off in school.)

Gender discrimination and discrimination based on reproductive status. Lovely.
As far as I know, this applies to men and women equally. Certainly, the 5-year retirement age bonus which has applied to government employees for some time is not based on gender. I know a man who went to work for the then-nationalised phone company at age 18 and retired 30 years later, with 5 years bonus for 3 kids.

As for the other part, it's simply designed to compensate for time spent not working due to bringing up children. This would not be regarded as discriminatory anywhere in Europe.

Don't forget, most Europeans have been brought up - since Bismarck - to expect that the state will be fairly substantially involved in their retirement income. In France and many other countries, the state administers or guarantees a number of pension schemes which have a substantial degree of proportionality to your income. (Notable exceptions are the UK and the Netherlands, where the state retirement pension is a fixed, and unspectacular, amount; however, both of those countries have fairly sophisticated private pension provision, including generous tax deductibility, which is handy due to their - by US standards - eye-watering marginal income tax rates.)
 
To add to what BigNick said, if a holiday (for instance Christmas/New Year's) fall on a weekend, the French do not get an "extra day" - Monday or Friday, as we in the U.S. would get.

If they want time off, they have to use a vacation (leave) day.

In addition, most are required to take their vacation (usually 20 days - a full month) during the month of August (varies by company). Sweden does the same thing for the month of July. At least that was the schedule for the companies I worked for at the time. Of course, being based in a U.S. subsidiary, I did not have to adhere to any such schedule.

Most of vacation in Europe is centered around the school schedule.

To take a week here and there is not common, as it is in the U.S.
 
Last edited:
As far as I know, this applies to men and women equally. Certainly, the 5-year retirement age bonus which has applied to government employees for some time is not based on gender. I know a man who went to work for the then-nationalised phone company at age 18 and retired 30 years later, with 5 years bonus for 3 kids.

As for the other part, it's simply designed to compensate for time spent not working due to bringing up children. This would not be regarded as discriminatory anywhere in Europe.
If the details aren't gender-specific, that's better. And to go back to an earlier point I made, there's a difference between giving extra "service credits" for stay-at-home parents and letting them retire earlier than everyone else. If this was just sensational journalism designed to cause controversy (that never happens) and the law is gender-neutral, I withdraw my objection to it. But the article made it sound like women get it over the men. (As someone with no kids I'm not thrilled about the "3 kids gets you a break" aspect but I can more easily live with that than with gender discrimination. At least having kids is something you can choose as opposed to being unable to qualify due to circumstances out of your control.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom