Hypercaffeinated gun-toting constitutional-rights enthusiasts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nords

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 11, 2002
Messages
26,861
Location
Oahu
I can't believe that I'd want to read JG's input on this subject, but here goes...

This NYT article caught my eye:
StarBulletin.com - Mobile Edition

My first thought was "Ruh-roh, this can't end well..." but on further reflection I think it's an interesting statement on how the media manipulates public perception.

I've been around firearms all my life, although I don't bother to own or carry one. (Submarine sailors + firearms = one of the most deadly Darwin Awards known to man.) When I leave the house, I already have enough possessions on my body to keep track of, and I think a holster would just be hot/sweaty. I personally feel that packin' heat tempts testosterone-poisoned individuals to barge into situations that I'd be better off avoiding (or running like a scared bunny) and in Hawaii it's very inconvenient to own even a licensed firearm. I certainly don't want to be in that database when the patrol car checks my license plate.

But when I read the article I automatically assumed that a Starbucks full of firearms is a bad thing. Intellectually I know that's not the case, and now I wonder about the causal correlation between open carry and crime rates. (Open carry::accident rates is another correlation that I can probably already predict.) I'd attend one of these events just to see what's fashionable.

Is this activism causing a fuss on the Mainland, or is it just media hype? Any other perspectives?
 
Just wait until someone tries to jump the line at Starbucks, and the soccer moms twitching for a caffeine fix are all packing heat...:whistle:
 
Is this activism causing a fuss on the Mainland, or is it just media hype? Any other perspectives?

Not much of a ripple as far as I can tell. I saw the article in the paper, but the issue doesn't seem to have gone "viral."

I think the "open carry" folks are misguided on this issue and they are hurting their cause. Here we have a retailer that allows open carry (and does not prohibit concealed carry). That's a good thing. So, these nuts show up packing heat, making a scene, and driving off the other paying customers. Starbucks would be entirely justified in changing their policy to deny entry to all those openly displaying firearms in reaction to this dust-up.

If these folks want to advance open/concealed carry issues, they should be writing letters to merchants in appreciation for permissive policies and noting how often they frequent these merchants. They should be polite and low key. And, they should carefully consider what they gain by open carry that they could not just as well achieve by concealed carry. I can't help but think that a lot of these folks just want to be seen in public with a gun, craving the attention they get. Just go get a body piercing instead and stop stirring the pot, I say.
 
I just became aware of it a couple of years ago when I was researching some other gun-related issue online and found a website devoted to promoting legalized open carry. Outside that encounter though, I haven't seen or heard anything.

I don't think it's about self-defense as much as it is a push to get states to back off on restrictions on carrying weapons in general.

Politics aside, as a self-defense technique I think it's stupid. Guns not magic amulets that ward off evil spirits, they're tools to be used effectively and soundly. Cops in uniform who openly carry get taken on all the time by armed offenders, and other cops are constantly learning how to prepare for that - often by studying the mistakes made by others. There is a lot more to being credibly capable of using a weapon in self-defense that goes way beyond ownership, a little practice, and carrying it where everyone can see it. Attitude and preparation is a giant part of being ready, if you're going to whip out your hogleg but aren't really prepared to kill someone, you need to carry a gun made out of milk chocolate - because there are a lot of dudes out there who aren't scared and will make you eat that thing.
 
Yes, it seems like a lot of hype.

But I would personally feel very uncomfortable going to any place where Joe Blow can power trip by carrying a clearly visible gun. I have no problem with concealed carry though.
 
... Attitude and preparation is a giant part of being ready, if you're going to whip out your hogleg but aren't really prepared to kill someone, you need to carry a gun made out of milk chocolate - because there are a lot of dudes out there who aren't scared and will make you eat that thing.

Couple years ago a friend who carries was jumped by a druggie stepson and several of his 15-16YO friends. Told me his main concern was keeping his concealed weapon concealed. He got scuffed up pretty well, got in a few licks himself, but no one died. Comparatively clean and simple outcome.
 
Just had a local dude with conceal/carry permit flash it at a guy in another car that was following too close...or some other "transgression". The police caught the concealed carry guy and I do believe he is in some trouble.

My fear is that most/many of the CC guys are convinced they need to be personally armed to unilaterally "fix" all they deem wrong with our country...and also to be the righteous rule of law when required. Not sure it is a good idea. I think we will have more pulling of guns during temper tantrums...
 
I come down firmly on the right to legally own and legally carry a weapon but I'm not in favor of displaying the weapon. Just seems like asking for trouble.

And why do police have the "right" to inspect a weapon? The quick answer would be to see if it were stolen but if that's the reason why not inspect folks with cell phones to see if they are stolen.

Not in favor of folks openly displaying a gun but am in favor of their right to do so.
 
I think if we got a bunch of hyper-caffeinated soccer moms and put out some videos showing them driving tanks and flying fighter jets, North Korea would be more than happy to back off their nuclear program...........:)
 
I think if we got a bunch of hyper-caffeinated soccer moms and put out some videos showing them driving tanks and flying fighter jets, North Korea would be more than happy to back off their nuclear program...........:)

if you shot the video during the right [-]wrong[/-] week of the month, even Iran would fall in line...:whistle:
 
It got some attention around here. Some gun control proponents demonstrated in front of a Starbucks in Old Town Alexandria, VA. I don't think most people care one way or the other.
 
I grew up in rural Montana where open carry was commonplace. It wasn't a bit unusual to see hunters, hikers and other outdoor sports enthusiasts pushing a cart through the grocery store with a sidearm on their belt. If anything, it was often a conversation starter "Hey, how do you like your Ruger Blackhawk?"

I feel that concealed carry is better and hold a permit to do so. Why upset the folks who aren't comfortable with visible firearms? And why not leave the bad guys guessing about who does or doesn't:confused:?
 
I'm willing to stipulate that these guys are "manlier" men than I am. Do you suppose that will satisfy them enough to put their guns away?
 
In 2001 the concealed weapons permit process was opened up in Michigan to basically anyone that is not a convicted felon or visibly crazy. The prediction was open gun battles in the streets, but anecdotally, it seems to have changed little. Once in a while there is a story of a shooting in Detroit, usually involving someone reacting to a crime or attempted crime.
 
Frankly if I noticed a person carrying anything other than a shotgun in a public place I would leave. If the merchant thinks that is OK because it is legal then they won't get my business. I too have rights and I vote with my pocketbook.
 
Frankly if I noticed a person carrying anything other than a shotgun in a public place I would leave. If the merchant thinks that is OK because it is legal then they won't get my business. I too have rights and I vote with my pocketbook.

Funny, I'd leave if I saw someone carrying a shotgun because that seems much more out of place than a person with a holstered pistol.

BTW, have you seen someone with a shotgun in a public place like a convenience store or Walmart. That would scare me a bit. A pistol, not so much.
 
I guess you don't have bird hunters in your family.

Frankly guns of any kind aren't what I want to be around; but a shotgun, depending on the setting, is less threatening. A guy carrying a shotgun dressed up for bird hunting isn't threatening to me, people aren't the target in mind. Now if a person wasn't in a bird hunting environment I would sashay out of there too.
 
No, no bird hunters but I did have an aunt who netted butterflies.

I have to laugh because, as a Los Angeles resident, the words "public place" instantly registers as a building or parking lot, and now I see what you mean. We don't have a lot of flora and fauna here.:LOL:
 
I think they are trying to desensitize the "public." Most see a gun and think negative. They think DANGER. Plenty of people carry knives, which are far more dangerous (I think knives kill more people than guns, but not sure). But people have been conditioned to react negatively to guns for some reason.
A gun is just a thing. Just like a knife. Its the INTENT that matters, not the tool.
Not too long ago in my state (NH) we used to see hunters all the time walking and carrying their guns. Fewer and fewer people now hunt, and fewer and fewer are exposed to guns. I would expect someone to call 911 if they saw a hunter walking along the road with a gun now a days.
 
yup - 10-11 years ago i was shooting nutria in a trashcan in the alley with a .22 rifle in this little town; a few years before that was knocking pigeons (flying rats) off the roof of a rental apartment building in Salem with a .22 pellet pistol. At this point in time I would avoid either - be afraid I'd get SWATed down in a hail of police gunfire.
 
I think they are trying to desensitize the "public." Most see a gun and think negative. They think DANGER. Plenty of people carry knives, which are far more dangerous (I think knives kill more people than guns, but not sure). But people have been conditioned to react negatively to guns for some reason.
A gun is just a thing. Just like a knife. Its the INTENT that matters, not the tool.
Not too long ago in my state (NH) we used to see hunters all the time walking and carrying their guns. Fewer and fewer people now hunt, and fewer and fewer are exposed to guns. I would expect someone to call 911 if they saw a hunter walking along the road with a gun now a days.

I grew up in the country and I am used to see hunters carrying their rifles in public. They were dressed like hunters, they behaved like hunters, their rifles (the tools of their trade) were unloaded when they were in public so their intents were clear and there was no reason to feel threatened. Other uniformed professionals carry loaded guns in public all the time (cops, military, security,...) and I don't feel threaten by them either because, again, their intent is clear.

But what is the intent of Joe Blow when he walks into a Starbucks with a loaded hand gun clearly visible on his hip? Is it for self-defense? Is it to send a message? Is it for intimidation? Is he mentally unstable and ready to shoot everyone in the joint if his latte is not prepared just so? Personally, I don't want to have to find out...
 
Firedreamer and I are both of the same opinion.

A hunter to carries their rifle in public unloaded does so to keep it from being stolen out of his/her car, or they are shopping for something associated with the rifle so they need it in hand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom