Screw that (so to speak), I'd rather ask Neil Bush about HIS sex life...Cut-Throat said:So do you believe, it would be a fair question to ask 'W' about his sex life in his next press conference? Or any President for that matter.
Screw that (so to speak), I'd rather ask Neil Bush about HIS sex life...Cut-Throat said:So do you believe, it would be a fair question to ask 'W' about his sex life in his next press conference? Or any President for that matter.
((^+^)) SG said:He chose to send hundreds of thousands of National Guard troops to Iraq without considering the effect of internal response for emergencies.
Hey, if you started with an assumption that hundreds of thousands meant 900,000, the negative number you come up with would be even larger. Why stop at 300,000?xavion said:Okay, you state that Bush has sent 'hundreds of thousands' of National Guard troops to Iraq. Hundreds of thousands could be anywhere from 200,000 to 900,000.
There are approximately 170,000 US military personnel in or close to Iraq. If Bush sent 'hundreds of thousands'... lets say, 300,000 National Guard troops to Iraq, that must mean that there are negative 130,000 active duty and reserve troops in or near Iraq. Wow.
The actual number of national guard troops in Iraq is less than 'hundreds of thousands.' Please try to limit your wild exaggerations in the future. Thank You.
xavion said:Okay, you state that Bush has sent 'hundreds of thousands' of National Guard troops to Iraq. Hundreds of thousands could be anywhere from 200,000 to 900,000.
There are approximately 170,000 US military personnel in or close to Iraq. If Bush sent 'hundreds of thousands'... lets say, 300,000 National Guard troops to Iraq, that must mean that there are negative 130,000 active duty and reserve troops in or near Iraq. Wow.
The actual number of national guard troops in Iraq is less than 'hundreds of thousands.' Please try to limit your wild exaggerations in the future. Thank You.
73ss454 said:Moghopper,
You state that he should have admitted it. My thing is that he should have never been asked.
Stuff like this is just not our business.
Cut-Throat said:Really? - Do you really think that this is anyone's business besides Hillary's? You are very strange indeed if you think a President or even a citizen should be inflicted with this line of questioning?
Maybe your cramped up style of ethics and political leanings does not really understand the concept of Freedom? You can find plenty of countries in the Middle East that are as uptight about sex and freedom as you seem to be.
What part of Freedom don't you understand?
justin said:I don't think in an ideal world Bill Clinton's personal transgressions with Ms. Lewinsky should have been made public. Let's deal with reality though.
Cut-Throat said:BTW- In some of your Middle Eastern countries Adultry is illegal. It's not here. That is the part of 'Freedom' that you don't get.
justin said:Clinton's sex acts w/ Ms. Lewinsky are also illegal in a number of states (I'd imagine it isn't in D.C. though, given their lax moral standards).
I think disclosure depends on whose money paid to clean the Oval Office furniture & carpet after this particular transgression-- the taxpayers, the Democratic party... or the Republican party.justin said:I don't think in an ideal world Bill Clinton's personal transgressions with Ms. Lewinsky should have been made public.
moghopper said:Actually illegal, or is it considered a breach of (marriage) contract?
moghopper said:Being CEO and having sex with an employee isn't wise, in general. Just ask Harry Stonecipher.
(I don't think Harry should have been let go by Boeing either)
moghopper said:Actually illegal, or is it considered a breach of (marriage) contract?
MRGALT2U said:If it is a "breach" any good defense attorney could contain the damage
during oral argument.
JG
Cut-Throat said:So do you believe, it would be a fair question to ask 'W' about his sex life in his next press conference? Or any President for that matter.
Have Funds said:The oral argument...
MRGALT2U said:Glad someone caught that. I was starting to think my talents
(quite vast) were unappreciated.
Once in a while I leave off the smiley face. Just a test folks
JG
moghopper said:I have to disagree to an extent.
I believe if you're going to run for public office, and become a public figure, anything in your past is fair game - whether that is screwing your secretary, your intern, driving drunk, or being a cokehead.