haha
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I pursue a somewhat different investment strategy than this board's most popular one of allocation and indexing. I believe that investment gains are like profits, a function of insight, not an automatic return to capital.
I started a self directed retirement plan (KEO) in December, 1974. Over the following 7 years, that is until December 1981- I contributed a total of $22,421 to that plan. I then changed my work, and no longer either contibuted to the plan, nor withdrew from it. I cannot say how much was allocated to equities vs. fixed on average. I know that my equity exposure was at times as low as 25%, at other times as high as 95%. I varied it according to my take on what was available at the time. I think overall, I probably had about 60-75% equity exposure. The key thing is that this account was managed by a type of bottoms up market timing. Since it is a retirement account, I was never able to use margin.
The account now has a balance of $670,000. Using Excel, and plugging in my numbers, that shows me an IRR of 12.8% over this 30 years. I have followed what I believe to be a conservative posture in this account, at least compared to my other taxable and non-taxable accounts.
I don't know what it would be worth if invested in whatever was the closest thing to it in equity exposure and risk, but I think it does at least show that actively managing an investment is not necesarily the losers' game that it is often made out to be. Additionally, although I could not provide figures as I can in this account, this is not my best result. In other accounts I have taken larger risks-eg. big bets on beaten down sectors, and made larger returns. Warren Buffet it definitely isn't, but IMO it's not too shabby either.
Now I have to go make myself some food. Hasta la vista!
Mikey
I started a self directed retirement plan (KEO) in December, 1974. Over the following 7 years, that is until December 1981- I contributed a total of $22,421 to that plan. I then changed my work, and no longer either contibuted to the plan, nor withdrew from it. I cannot say how much was allocated to equities vs. fixed on average. I know that my equity exposure was at times as low as 25%, at other times as high as 95%. I varied it according to my take on what was available at the time. I think overall, I probably had about 60-75% equity exposure. The key thing is that this account was managed by a type of bottoms up market timing. Since it is a retirement account, I was never able to use margin.
The account now has a balance of $670,000. Using Excel, and plugging in my numbers, that shows me an IRR of 12.8% over this 30 years. I have followed what I believe to be a conservative posture in this account, at least compared to my other taxable and non-taxable accounts.
I don't know what it would be worth if invested in whatever was the closest thing to it in equity exposure and risk, but I think it does at least show that actively managing an investment is not necesarily the losers' game that it is often made out to be. Additionally, although I could not provide figures as I can in this account, this is not my best result. In other accounts I have taken larger risks-eg. big bets on beaten down sectors, and made larger returns. Warren Buffet it definitely isn't, but IMO it's not too shabby either.
Now I have to go make myself some food. Hasta la vista!
Mikey