Free To Canoe
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Doesn't look good for Warren and the gang.
David Sokol Resigns From Berkshire Hathaway - NYTimes.com
David Sokol Resigns From Berkshire Hathaway - NYTimes.com
Most eyes will be on Berkshire now, but I wonder if some folks won't seek to buy whatever Sokol ends up managing next. They may see him as someone who has been close to the Oracle, knows how the Berkshire magic is made, and apparently was good enough to earn Warren's trust (even if he proved not to be honest enough).Looks like Berkshire dodged a bullet by getting rid of Sokol now instead of after he'd taken over for Buffett.
Internal conflicts can cause people to make seemingly bizarre self-destoying moves. Maybe he just was not ready to step up onto such a stage?Even if he ultimately is determined to have done nothing illegal, you would expect someone in his position to know how bad it would look to front-run your employer. I wonder what he was thinking?
Maybe because (1) the SEC already has a pretty clear policy on front-running, and (2) the individual companies of Berkshire had their own policies in place (and presumably still do) before Berkshire bought them.Regardless of whether this is illegal or not, why does BRK not have a clear conflict of interest policy that says what investments its managers can make and what are forbidden? I can't believe that a sophisticated company such as this one has never had this issue come up before.
This is a poignant example of the perils of investing in individual stocks. To those investors who say "Oh, I know the company's management and I trust them to do the right thing": well, no you don't, and apparently even the boss can be surprised by management. Looks like Berkshire dodged a bullet by getting rid of Sokol now instead of after he'd taken over for Buffett.
I just finished reading the Audit committee report and ruthless is pretty good description. I think Sokol will be lucky if he avoids jail time and I am sure the Berkshire/Buffett will cooperate in trying to put him there.Lose a shred of reputation for the firm, and I will be ruthless
I just finished reading the Audit committee report and ruthless is pretty good description. I think Sokol will be lucky if he avoids jail time and I am sure the Berkshire/Buffett will cooperate in trying to put him there.
Some people criticize Buffett for not asking Sokol more about his Lubrizol stock positions. I don't it was Sokol obligation to tell Warren of the huge conflict. I do think Warren was much to quick to proclaim his innocence prior to an investigation. However, the good news is that most companies get in more trouble for the cover up than the initial misdeed and the audit committee report avoids this problem.
They listerned.He should go to jail, just like Martha did. No matter how he spins it, this is cheating and what the US public really does not need any more of now is more proof that the investing public is just a bunch of patsies for our overlords. Charge him try him, and jail the schmuck.
Ha
An interesting read.... and the initial shot for the legal battle that is about to start... the company has put in writing that they will not defend him in court for any criminal activity he might be charged with...
They also said that they will probably go after his profits... now, I am not a lawyer, but I do not see how they will be able to get them unless there is language in the code that makes it a legal contract between him and the company that he breached...
But it does how how unethical he is....