An unwelcome subject.
Doctor Doom is not the favorite actor in the early retirement scenario, but sometimes, negative possibilites have to be considered... when actions CAN ameliorate a difficult situation.
The first line of defense in planning for retirement, is having more money than what is needed. The safety net. The second obvious protection is the ability to reduce one's expenditures. And we usually stop there, as it seems there is little more that can be done. Thus the reason for the subject of the thread.... To explore some of the possibilities that could provide a third line of defense...
A starting point for discussion...
Hyperinflation.
There are some things that can be done, besides converting cash to gold and burying it in the back yard.
Wkipedia has a very good explanation of hyperinflation, and IMHO, a worthwhile read... not just to skim, but to understand. The statistics, history and explanations provide a good framework for building a plan of action, to stay ahead of the problems and to come out at the other end without being a victim.
Some things to consider, and to understand.
-What happens to your investments... annuities... and the companies where they are managed?
-What happens to Federal Taxes?
- Keeping money offshore? Which stable currency?
-What happens to your personal debt?
-Will credit be available?
-What are the early warning signals?
-Availabilty and cost of necessities... food, shelter
-What constitutes hyperinflation? Percentages - Time period
-A time to invest?
-What happens to Social Security... Pensions... Government Subsidies etc.
-Status of world economy... Wars...
-Timetable for confidence loss...
-Investing for post inflation...
-The early rush to buy "safe" investments... commodities... land... etc.
Excerpt:
Yeah... negative... an annoyance... but it might not hurt to be aware of the possibilites, and to consider the what ifs...Hyperinflation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doctor Doom is not the favorite actor in the early retirement scenario, but sometimes, negative possibilites have to be considered... when actions CAN ameliorate a difficult situation.
The first line of defense in planning for retirement, is having more money than what is needed. The safety net. The second obvious protection is the ability to reduce one's expenditures. And we usually stop there, as it seems there is little more that can be done. Thus the reason for the subject of the thread.... To explore some of the possibilities that could provide a third line of defense...
A starting point for discussion...
Hyperinflation.
There are some things that can be done, besides converting cash to gold and burying it in the back yard.
Wkipedia has a very good explanation of hyperinflation, and IMHO, a worthwhile read... not just to skim, but to understand. The statistics, history and explanations provide a good framework for building a plan of action, to stay ahead of the problems and to come out at the other end without being a victim.
Some things to consider, and to understand.
-What happens to your investments... annuities... and the companies where they are managed?
-What happens to Federal Taxes?
- Keeping money offshore? Which stable currency?
-What happens to your personal debt?
-Will credit be available?
-What are the early warning signals?
-Availabilty and cost of necessities... food, shelter
-What constitutes hyperinflation? Percentages - Time period
-A time to invest?
-What happens to Social Security... Pensions... Government Subsidies etc.
-Status of world economy... Wars...
-Timetable for confidence loss...
-Investing for post inflation...
-The early rush to buy "safe" investments... commodities... land... etc.
Excerpt:
Much attention on hyperinflation centers on the effect on savers whose investment becomes worthless. Academic economists seem not to have devoted much study on the (positive) effect on debtors. This may be due to the widespread perception that consistently saving a portion of one's income in monetary investments such as bonds or interest-bearing accounts is almost always a wise policy, and usually beneficial to the society of the savers. By contrast, incurring large or long-term debts (though sometimes unavoidable) is viewed as often resulting from irresponsibility or self-indulgence.[citation needed] Interest rate changes often cannot keep up with hyperinflation or even high inflation, certainly with contractually fixed interest rates. (For example, in the 1970s in the United Kingdom inflation reached 25% per annum, yet interest rates did not rise above 15% – and then only briefly – and many fixed interest rate loans existed). Contractually there is often no bar to a debtor clearing his long term debt with "hyperinflated-cash" nor could a lender simply somehow suspend the loan. "Early redemption penalties" were (and still are) often based on a penalty of x months of interest/payment; again no real bar to paying off what had been a large loan. In interwar Germany, for example, much private and corporate debt was effectively wiped out; certainly for those holding fixed interest rate loans.
Yeah... negative... an annoyance... but it might not hurt to be aware of the possibilites, and to consider the what ifs...Hyperinflation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited: