Castaspey
Dryer sheet wannabe
While my post count reveals me to be a newbe here, and I may not be as skilled with the search feature as I might be, I am not finding as many threads on LTCI as I thought there might be. It is a potentially huge financial decision, and people in their 50's are at the right point in life to be considering it.
In the interest of full disclosure, DW and I each bought policies about 18 months ago. But it took me over a year to make the decision because there is really no accurate way to do the math to determine if it is a sound decision--too many assumptions need to be made, and the costs of different policies is not widely available on the web. I also know that anecdotal evidence ("It sure paid out for our Mom when Dad got the big A") is not a sound basis for deciding.
I typically try to avoid complex financial products because they have to be paying an economic return to whomever is offering them, and that means I am paying it and would therefore come out ahead without their product. So my default logic would lead me to not buy LTCI.
For me it came down to four factors. 1) It allowed me to take a very stochastic and potentially huge expense and convert it into a much more predictable expense that I could build into our financial plan. 2) I came to realize that I was not insuring my access to the care, but I was insuring my assets. 3) The ultimate beneficiaries of the decision will be our kids because the decision will impact the size of the estate (if any) that is left to them and they were pro-LTCI. 4) DW and I do not have large extended families living in the area and therefore do not have that safety net.
But there are as many right answers to the question as there are life situations and am not at all arguing that our decision to buy LTCI applies to anyone else. My hope is that it spawns some divergent ways to think through the decision.
In the interest of full disclosure, DW and I each bought policies about 18 months ago. But it took me over a year to make the decision because there is really no accurate way to do the math to determine if it is a sound decision--too many assumptions need to be made, and the costs of different policies is not widely available on the web. I also know that anecdotal evidence ("It sure paid out for our Mom when Dad got the big A") is not a sound basis for deciding.
I typically try to avoid complex financial products because they have to be paying an economic return to whomever is offering them, and that means I am paying it and would therefore come out ahead without their product. So my default logic would lead me to not buy LTCI.
For me it came down to four factors. 1) It allowed me to take a very stochastic and potentially huge expense and convert it into a much more predictable expense that I could build into our financial plan. 2) I came to realize that I was not insuring my access to the care, but I was insuring my assets. 3) The ultimate beneficiaries of the decision will be our kids because the decision will impact the size of the estate (if any) that is left to them and they were pro-LTCI. 4) DW and I do not have large extended families living in the area and therefore do not have that safety net.
But there are as many right answers to the question as there are life situations and am not at all arguing that our decision to buy LTCI applies to anyone else. My hope is that it spawns some divergent ways to think through the decision.