mathjak107
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 6,206
I found this chart on Motley Fool. Looks like the differences in benefits between starting at 62 or 70 do not become significant until around 85.
it actually is older than 85 . once you figure in "
the checks you gave up
no more compounding on the invested assets you spent down . just using TIPS TOOK 20 YEARS TO EVEN . A BALANCED FUND 22-23 YEARS
no protection from medicare increases
and in our case my wife does not get a 4200.00 dollar adder to her own early benefit until i file since 1/2 my full is more than her full.
it takes until 90 to see a real significant difference ..
but the larger ss check has no sequence risk so it does make you a lot less dependent on markets and rates .
it all boils down to risk and which you prefer . do you want longevity risk ? or market and interest rate risk ?
Last edited: