photoguy
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 2,301
@ Missionfinder
It seems like it would be common sense that the bigger incentive you give people, the more they will engage in it.
For example, consider the following scenario: You want to buy a nikon D3x camera (engagement ring, laptop, etc) that sells for $8000. You could buy it in NY and pay $2400 in fair tax or you could just hop across the border to canada and buy it paying $0 tax. This sort of avoidance happens right now all the time (although people are often coming to the US to buy the gear).
Here's what economist W. Gale says in his papers:
"Other countries have at- tempted to implement some variant of a national retail sales tax with little success on the enforcement front when rates climb to more than 10 percent."
and
"A national retail sales tax would offer numerous channels for avoidance and evasion. Taxpayers could combine business activity — which is generally exempt from retail sales taxation — with personal consump- tion.22 Consumers could purchase items from offshore entities and not pay taxes on the purchases. The enforce- ment of state-level ‘‘use’’ taxes and voluntary filings has been ‘‘dismal at best’’ (Murray 1997), and the applicable tax rates for those taxes are far lower than the rates that would prevail in an NRST, which implies that people would have much stronger incentives to evade the NRST. It would prove difficult to collect high-rate sales taxes from small-scale retailers and service industries. More generally, the two parties to a sale would have incentives to report lower-than-accurate transaction prices to the government and split the tax savings in some manner."
and
"One of the most important determinants of the level of evasion in the current system is whether anyone other than the taxpayer withholds taxes or reports the tax to the government. The rate of evasion is currently around 17 percent in the income tax, but varies greatly by withhold- ing and reporting arrangements. For income on which taxes are withheld and reported to government by a third party, the evasion rate is about 1 percent. That predomi- nantly involves withholding of taxes on wages. At the other extreme, for income on which taxes are not with- held and there is no third-party reporting, the evasion rate is 30 percent or more. The retail sales tax would be collected only from businesses that make retail sales; there would be no withholding or reporting by anyone other than the business itself, so the possibility of signifi- cant evasion needs to be taken seriously."
from
http://www.aei.org/docLib/20070302_GalePaper.pdf
It seems like it would be common sense that the bigger incentive you give people, the more they will engage in it.
For example, consider the following scenario: You want to buy a nikon D3x camera (engagement ring, laptop, etc) that sells for $8000. You could buy it in NY and pay $2400 in fair tax or you could just hop across the border to canada and buy it paying $0 tax. This sort of avoidance happens right now all the time (although people are often coming to the US to buy the gear).
Here's what economist W. Gale says in his papers:
"Other countries have at- tempted to implement some variant of a national retail sales tax with little success on the enforcement front when rates climb to more than 10 percent."
and
"A national retail sales tax would offer numerous channels for avoidance and evasion. Taxpayers could combine business activity — which is generally exempt from retail sales taxation — with personal consump- tion.22 Consumers could purchase items from offshore entities and not pay taxes on the purchases. The enforce- ment of state-level ‘‘use’’ taxes and voluntary filings has been ‘‘dismal at best’’ (Murray 1997), and the applicable tax rates for those taxes are far lower than the rates that would prevail in an NRST, which implies that people would have much stronger incentives to evade the NRST. It would prove difficult to collect high-rate sales taxes from small-scale retailers and service industries. More generally, the two parties to a sale would have incentives to report lower-than-accurate transaction prices to the government and split the tax savings in some manner."
and
"One of the most important determinants of the level of evasion in the current system is whether anyone other than the taxpayer withholds taxes or reports the tax to the government. The rate of evasion is currently around 17 percent in the income tax, but varies greatly by withhold- ing and reporting arrangements. For income on which taxes are withheld and reported to government by a third party, the evasion rate is about 1 percent. That predomi- nantly involves withholding of taxes on wages. At the other extreme, for income on which taxes are not with- held and there is no third-party reporting, the evasion rate is 30 percent or more. The retail sales tax would be collected only from businesses that make retail sales; there would be no withholding or reporting by anyone other than the business itself, so the possibility of signifi- cant evasion needs to be taken seriously."
from
http://www.aei.org/docLib/20070302_GalePaper.pdf