Rich_by_the_Bay
Moderator Emeritus
I posted something like this under a "what do you think of annuities instead of..." topic, but realized I am more interested in the overall strategy rather than the annuity piece, so here is a re-framing of my question (besides, the term "annuity" is like a reply-repellant ):
Most here talk about the 4% rule and its variants but I didn't see much about the "buffer account" approach:
Nothing new here - it's a widely written-about strategy (e.g. DeMuth/Stein and others) which feels right to me.
Hard for me to see a big down side, and there seem to be some advantages (e.g. the buffer account allows you to stay a bit more "aggressive" in your investment piece, and more patient when it takes a long slide). I guess it needs a pretty good nest egg to avoid having too much tied up in the conservative buffer acct.
Anyone doing a plan like this (with or without annuities)? Any traps in it? Somehow it rings true for me.
Most here talk about the 4% rule and its variants but I didn't see much about the "buffer account" approach:
- sock away about 5-6 yrs of anticipated income needs as liquid, cash-like investments (even a 5-year ann&*#ty payout)
- remainder of nest egg will be in 60/40 or 65/35 stocks and bonds, well spread out
- the 5-year income "buffer" fund gets replenished periodically from either stocks or bonds, or both mostly from whichever does better that year.
- When everything is down, youdrill deeper into my income escrow where I can wait it out for that 5 years if necessary.
- the accounts get reallocated back to desired proportions annually or so
Nothing new here - it's a widely written-about strategy (e.g. DeMuth/Stein and others) which feels right to me.
Hard for me to see a big down side, and there seem to be some advantages (e.g. the buffer account allows you to stay a bit more "aggressive" in your investment piece, and more patient when it takes a long slide). I guess it needs a pretty good nest egg to avoid having too much tied up in the conservative buffer acct.
Anyone doing a plan like this (with or without annuities)? Any traps in it? Somehow it rings true for me.