fisherman
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Messages
- 500
You seemed to have interpreted my position as a pro Republican one. You are incorrect, my position is a strict interpretation of the Constitution. I agree Bush's part D should not be allowed.
That was not my intent. I just thought I would mention one from the Republicans also that fit since one from the Democrats was already being discussed. You know Fair and Balanced.
In regards to your position the Supreme Court does not appear to agree with you from many rulings over several decades so I cannot provide any better information than that.
You really ought to look into the books I mentioned as I think you would really enjoy them. I have loaned copies to friends who are Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, and Independent and all have fund them to be enjoyable reads. There is a lot of information on how the Constitution was developed and what each person wanted in it. That time in our history was truly a miraculous time and the books shed considerable light on the inter personal workings.