Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Critics in White House (OMB) blast EPA greenhouse gas ruling
Old 05-12-2009, 09:19 PM   #1
samclem's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,922
Critics in White House (OMB) blast EPA greenhouse gas ruling

The OMB posted an internal review of the EPA's proposal to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases as pollutants. Among the comments by reviewers at various agencies:

"Making the decision to regulate carbon dioxide ... is likely to have serious economic consequences for regulated entities throughout the U.S. economy, including small businesses and small communities"
According to a Newsday article,
The memo says . . . . the EPA seemed to stretch the precautionary principle to support regulation despite the "unprecedented uncertainty" in linking emissions of greenhouse gases and the warming that will result to health effects.

"It really appears to me that the decision was based more on political calculations than on scientific ones," said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., who called the document "a smoking gun" during a hearing Tuesday on the Obama administration's proposed EPA budget.

"The counsel in this administration repeatedly questions the lack of scientific support that you have for this proposed finding," he said.
The head of OMB is in full defensive mode, saying that this memo was just a compilation of comments, and that OMB supports the EPA policy (of course it he does).

NPR ran a short story on the "smoking gun" memo this afternoon.

Well, whatever else this report was, it apparently didn't have the approval of the head of OMB. I haven't been able to find a copy of the report on a government site, apparently the OMB decided that maybe this whole "open administration" thing might have gone too far and they have taken it down.

So, at least a hint that some in the White House recognize this is more about ideology than science.

But, that's not what was supposed to happen! . . .

Promoting science isn't just about providing resources -- it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient -- especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda -- and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.
-- President Barack Obama, Mar 12, 2009.

samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-12-2009, 09:53 PM   #2
gone traveling
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,864
what a bunch of ht air...

Westernskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 08:15 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,464
cigarettes are not addictive.


It was always fun when lawyers and accountants where telling me what 'good' engineering was.

heh heh heh - the beat goes on.
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2009, 12:36 PM   #4
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TN Backwoods
Posts: 48
Instead of restricting CO2 emission, we could always tax O2 comsumtion...
alvarezg is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Virtual White House Tour Cattusbabe Other topics 0 11-26-2008 10:24 PM
Well, Looks Like a Choice of Three Dems for the White House........ FinanceDude Other topics 131 02-11-2008 11:46 AM
White House: As Many As 5 Million E-mails Possibly Missing FinallyRetired Other topics 7 04-15-2007 08:42 PM
IRA early W/D- Private-letter ruling mickeyd FIRE and Money 3 08-24-2004 11:44 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.