Military vs. Civilian

PsyopRanger

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
227
Military vs. Civilian

This has been my own internal debate for a long time. I am currently tailoring my FIRE plan to my military situation but I always wonder is the civilian grass greener?

In your opinion, what are the pros and con’s of each?

Military:

Lower Pay
Frequent Moves
No 401k match
Pension after 20
Health Insurance after 20

Civilian:

Higher Pay
Fewer Moves
401k match
No pension, Defined Contribution
No health insurance

I’ve got 6 years active and 10 years total. The pension keeps me going because of the thought of walking away with a COLA’d income after 20.

Is the pension really worth not being a civilian and getting those matching funds?
 
I have a friend who retired from the Army after 20 years, age=early forties,
had a civilian job waiting for him that paid the same as his military pay, plus had the Army retirement starting immediately ! Not too bad !
Now he can contribute to SS and 401k.
At age 62, he can get his SS, his 401k, and continue to get the military pension.
If you have 10 years to go, my recommendation would be to stay in the military,
assuming you like it there.
The grass is not always greener on the other side, no matter where you are.
 
bennevis said:
I have a friend who retired from the Army after 20 years, age=early forties,
had a civilian job waiting for him that paid the same as his military pay, plus had the Army retirement starting immediately ! Not too bad !

But that leaves me working not ER?
 
read my edited post above.
.
Is military pension enough to early retire on ?
 
Depends on a lot of factors that at your age (I am guessing about 23-27 or so) it is hard to really know for sure. I will give you my facts and you can use them as you want to. Joined Military at 17 as a E-1, retired at 38 as a W4 - all service in Army. HS drop out at time or enlistment; college graduate (BS in Business) at time of retirement. Made 17 moves, married 4 kids. No 401K, no savings until AFTER retirement. I do not think I would have done it any different, loved most of the assignments, locations etc. There were times in those 21 years when I wanted to just quit, lucky to have had a couple of friends that talked me out of doing that. Since retirement (now in the 27th year; retired in 1979) I really thank the fact I have that Military Retirement Pay Deposit every month and it has almost tripled in COLA's dollars; it is a great help. Of course you will have to save, save, save, outside of the retirement in order to retire early but, depending when you went in and when you will reach 20 years AD, you should be young enough to do another full career before reaching 60 years old. Thats my $.02, I am sure you will get many more and varied responses to this question. By the way do not discount the medical insurance/care it is really becoming a very costly factor in retirement and is a great asset to have.
 
PsyopRanger said:
Is the pension really worth not being a civilian and getting those matching funds?  
If the only thing keeping you in the military is the money then you'd better get out while you're still alive and (relatively) uninjured.

If you think that matching funds are all that they're cracked up to be then start a separate thread and take a poll among the board members.  I suspect that it's greener pastures.

If you're looking for greener pastures then contact a headhunter.  (I have shipmates in the business and 10 years ago I had several of them on speed dial.)  They'll tell you to expect an immediate pay dip as you make the transition, followed a few years down the road by better pay as you gain skills that civilian industry actually pays for.  It's like starting all over again at E-3 pay equivalence until you're considered to be "worth something".  And I know a couple people who can't contribute to their 401(k) or even get medical insurance until a probationary period has passed.  A decade later you may be better off than when you were active duty... or you may not.

A common thread among those who've left the military and excelled at their civilian career is "Great fun while it lasted but this is way better."  They've found their avocation.  A common thread among those who've left & struggled is "I miss the ethics, the camaraderie, and the sense of mission."  They only have a job.  I suspect that the former are internally motivated and the latter need the external boost.  You have to decide which category applies to you.

I thoroughly enjoyed the first 10 years but struggled to juggle family/work priorities for the next 10.  I made it but at times it was downright ugly and the lack of money was rarely as much of an issue as the quality of the life.  The pension is great and life is good but lately I've been wondering if my "Woo-hoo!!" attitude toward freedom and my allergic reaction to employment is the result of that final 10 years.  (Not that I'm complaining!)  If I had to do it all over again I'd have joined the Reserves when we started a family.  We would have had much more control over if/when we moved and worked, and the pension would "only" have been delayed by 19 years.  Continuity of paychecks is over-rated compared to having a measure of control over your life.

In the mid-90s a junior officer I worked with suffered through the same retention ambivalence during his first shore tour.  When the assignment officer visited our command and essentially peed on him in public to mark his territory, the JO decided that anything else had to be better.  He struggled with Lucas for several months before Lucas noted "You suck at getting hired but you're excellent at the career-search process" and hired him as a headhunter.  A few months later he conceived Lucas' first division dedicated to finding careers for retiring enlisted technicians, an area that they'd overlooked in the traditional food fight for junior officers.  His money has been huge and he smiles on the way to work every morning.  He's never looked back and he doesn't miss the military a bit.

OTOH the guy who helped him get started at Lucas has been in the Reserves for nearly 20 years (left active duty the minute his obligation was up) and is a Blue & Gold officer for the Naval Academy.  He's found a way to keep a foot in both worlds and he's doing great in both of them.
 
21 years military, followed by 22 years at Mega-corp. I agree with NORDS that staying in military for money might disappoint you or get you killed.  Remember I did both indentured servitudes.  OTOH, It rains checks at my house every month.  Best decision I ever made was to stay.  It seemed like a long time, those 20 years until retirement, but it's been 25 years since I left the military. TRICARE is a bargain and a big player.  I'd probably still be working, were it not for TRICARE.  Can you do it on a military pension alone?  I guess so, but it never crossed my mind. 
 
brewer12345 said:
I doubt that's legal even in Utah. Thailand, maybe? :LOL:

Sounds like he's somewhere in the Muslim world...

Unless, of course, he meant that he "married them" to other people, since he's a minister......


:LOL:
 
Both are bad choices.

In my opinion, both choices are totally based on security, steady paycheck, guarantee sick leave, annual leave and insurance. It's only good if you are NOT a "mover and shaker" and tends to seek stable life for yourself and family.

Everyone in my family who work for themselves are much better off than i am and also much much closer to RE, eventhough they sometime struggle and got more sleepless nite. Over all, if i to do it again, both military and civilian are NOT my choice.

enuff
 
Cool Dood said:
Unless, of course, he meant that he "married them" to other people, since he's a minister......

I think most states (let alone most denominations) would frown on marrying off 8 year olds... :LOL:
 
Psyop if you are proficient in Arabic and have security clearance from the military, I am sure you could retire and work for the Gov in a position at the CIA, NSA, or similar agency. You would probably make more and you could roll your time served over into the civil service 20 year retirement track. You would also have more flexibility to earn money from overtime and you could spend more time with your family. Your risk of being blown up would decrease substantially. After 20 years I hear you can retire and double your income by doing the exact same job in the exact same office with the exact same co-workers, working for a private defense contractor rather than the government directly. Maybe this could be an option for you when you get tired of moving around.
 
PsyopRanger,

The miltary pension is a very big deal. COLA'd and about as secure as these things can get, it can be the bedrock of your retirement income stream. The pension allows you to take more risk with your other investments (e.g. I've got few bonds in my portfolio, and have a larger than average share of small-cap and value equities than I'd feel comfortable with otherwise). The health care insurance is likewise very big--it is probably the largest concern of the folks on this board who are in their ER years. If you shop for civilian coverage you'll quickly appreciate the value of TRICARE. It's far from perfect, but it's way better than nothing.

During my AD years I thought of the pension and the retirement health care as "deferred overtime pay." I think a miltary career is a great springboard for ER. As Nords has noted, too few military folks plan ahead or have event thought of really retiring when they hang up their uniforms. Wait until you get into your TAP class, you'll immediately see this.

You already know the "con side" of the contract with Uncle Sam. In addition, as you fully appreciate, your Arabic language skills and other training could fetch a hefty premium in today's market. The work, though, woud probably be similar in many ways to what you can expect in the coming years--lots of time abroad.

If you've got, effectively, 6 years AD credit plus some reserve time, then you've got a little less than 14 years to go until you can get an immediate retirement check. You're right at the "fish or cut bait" point--after you sign up again you'll have too much invested to separate short of retirement. If you like what you are doing, like what you will be doing, and think you can hang with the program for 20, I'd urge you to stick it out. If this appears to be undoable, then you should make the decision soonest. Regarding the reserves/guard: This is normally a very good option for folks who separate, but you've got other issues since your OPTEMPO in the Reserves, in your MOS, might look an awful lot like an AD soldier.
 
Yeah, there is not much to seperate active duty from reserve component anymore, as far as OPTEMPO is concerned. I'be been in the national guard for going on 22 years. There is a crazy deployment pace right now.

In fact, some of our tours are longer than the active duty. We do 12 month "boots in country" tours, which typically include 3 or 4 months before and after deployment, totalling 18 months.

Sometimes I wish I had done 22 years active duty. I'd be collecting now, instead of waiting 20 more years to receive retirement benefits...
 
brewer12345 said:
I doubt that's legal even in Utah.  Thailand, maybe?   :LOL:

Only if they are not your first cousins and they are all female.  :D

One difference between military and civilian is your chance of getting killed or maimed is much higher in the military even if only training.  Your toys tend to be a little more dangerous than ink pens and staplers.   I would certainly factor this in to any comparison you might make between the two.  Sure you can get killed or maimed in an industrial setting too but I would guess the military would be more dangerous even if not assigned in a war zone.  

It is pretty hard to spend your retirement when you are dead.
 
macdaddy said:
Psyop if you are proficient in Arabic and have security clearance from the military, I am sure you could retire and work for the Gov in a position at the CIA, NSA, or similar agency.  You would probably make more and you could roll your time served over into the civil service 20 year retirement track.  You would also have more flexibility to earn money from overtime and you could spend more time with your family.  Your risk of being blown up would decrease substantially.  After 20 years I hear you can retire and double your income by doing the exact same job in the exact same office with the exact same co-workers, working for a private defense contractor rather than the government directly.  Maybe this could be an option for you when you get tired of moving around.
Good point... one of our local police officers is also an Army Reserve sergeant.

Although today "Reserve" is perhaps a misnomer. He's spent the last three years in a Kunia bunker listening to various Abu Sayyaf innocent people in the PI ordering terrorist attacks lumpia in Ilocano & Tagalog on various cell phones communications systems.

His spouse is pretty happy that he's not patrolling H-1 looking for meth dealers.
 
macdaddy said:
Psyop if you are proficient in Arabic and have security clearance from the military, I am sure you could retire and work for the Gov in a position at the CIA, NSA, or similar agency. You would probably make more and you could roll your time served over into the civil service 20 year retirement track. You would also have more flexibility to earn money from overtime and you could spend more time with your family. Your risk of being blown up would decrease substantially. After 20 years I hear you can retire and double your income by doing the exact same job in the exact same office with the exact same co-workers, working for a private defense contractor rather than the government directly. Maybe this could be an option for you when you get tired of moving around.

I am working with a lot of contractors who do just that, the question is do I want to give all that time to the government?

I am trying to decide on going for a Masters, if I am to go my current route, it is International relations and married to the government.

If it is something else, MBA, CPA…I have options out?
 
Enuff2Eat said:
Both are bad choices.

Over all, if i to do it again, both military and civilian are NOT my choice.

enuff

What's left? - Dead? (Self employed is civilian)
 
PsyopRanger said:
If it is something else, MBA, CPA…I have options out? 

You would NOT be happy as a CPA.

I have a couple people you could talk to if you have any doubt.
 
I got out after 5 years active duty back in '83. Went to top business school, earned MBA. Stayed in reserves, retired with 20 in 2000 (still 10 years away from collecting about 23% of base pay as 05).

If I'd stayed 15 more years and retired as 05, I'd be collecting currently a pension of about $42,000 per year. At 4% withdrawal rate, I'd need just over a million to generate the same COLA pension. Figuring in TRICARE, I'd need even more.

Have been making 200K+ for last 3 or 4 years and saving lots. I'm just approaching the level of financial assets necessary to replace the pension I'd be earning if I'd stayed on active duty. On the other hand, I have a lot of max Social Security contribution years which will hopefully help some in about 16 years.

I work for a privately held company that doesn't match anything on the 401K plan and there is no pension. I probably pay 40% of the cost of the medical insurance ($6-7K per year).

Bottom line -- the COLA pension and TRICARE are hard to replicate. If you enjoy the military life, don't leave thinking you'll do better financially. Stay for 20 then do something else. If you don't like the military, then go ahead and take your chances in the civilian world.
 
I spent just over 10 years in. I couldn't stand another day. It took three years to match the pay I left in the military. I actually mostly enjoy the work I do now (can't stand the whiney lefties or the stupid bad guys though). If I had stayed in I could be retired now, but I could also be in Leavenworth, so I'd say it is a good thing I exited when I did. With that said my father did 24 years, retired and is almost retired from his second career.

A reservist I worked with also exited active duty at the 19 year mark (to keep his ex from receiving any of his retirement. The way the judge worded the divorce decree was if he retired form active duty she would receive a certain amount. So this guy went into the reserves. After working for so many years he volunteered for an assignment and low and behold it worked out where he had worked equivalent to 20 years worth of days. He was able to retire from the reserves with a "reserve" retirement, but collect the money immediately that was more than his civilian pay due to the time in service. The retirement was classified a reserve retirement, but looked like an active duty retirement so his ex-wife lost out on the benies and he laughed all the way to the bank.

The short of it. If you like where your at the retirement benefits are good. If you just want to leave because the pay is better elsewhere, but you like your job you will probably regret it. I do miss the camaraderie and friends, but there was way to much bs and incompetence for me. I'm glad I left the military, but still get the itch to work in national security.
 
Back
Top Bottom