Firecalc - Spending model $ assumed inflation

engr

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Messages
68
Hello All,

I'm working on my retirement modeling and have a few questions.
1. Do links exist showing a poll of what percent of members use the Constant Spending Level option vs. the Bernicke's model? The former seems quite conservative and seems to be a worst case condition. The latter model gives a higher Spending Level. Or do members take an average of somewhere between the two? There's a big difference between the two results.

2. What inflation factor do most members use (eg 3%, 4%, CPI)?

3. What is the number of years used for retirement ( eg 30 years, 35 years)?

Thanks.
 
1. I look at all spending variables. Everyone's situation is different and mine could change.
2. 3%
3. 40 years
 
Constant Spending, CPI, and the worst case of 30, 35, 40 years.

Choosing an inflation % undermines the value of FIRECALC, IMO. With CPI, it used the historical values, which went ballistic in the 80's. 3% or 4% ain't even in the ballpark, and some of the failures pass through the 80's.

Long runs of 40 years result in fewer data points, as they don't include the last 39, 38, 37 etc starting years, as that won't be a complete 40 years.

-ERD50
 
When running FIRECalc, I generally use these inputs (although what you use is up to you, of course!)

1. Constant spending
2. CPI
3. 30 or 35 years (I am 65 years old right now)

I also take the results from any retirement calculator with a grain of salt.
 
I am a supporter so get the option to set in manually spending per year since we will have much higher spending for the next few years (kids still in school) and then spending will go down a lot. I do set a constant spending amount for when it goes down.

I've run it variously with different inflation and different retirement lengths.
 
1) Constant Spending
2) CPI
3) 50 years

You might want to read one of the two books by Henry K."Bud" Hebeler if you are leaning towards Bernicke's model. These books will convey a good bit of cautiousness to reflect on.

-gauss
 
Back
Top Bottom