Intermittent Fasting - my result so far

Did you eliminate beer too? I can't do that entirely. I have cut back as I no longer keep any at home. I do meet friends 1-2 times a week for a couple of cold ones. My biggest problem are snacks. I've got to replace bad snacks with more healthy ones. I like apples so I need to simply eat a few slices of one instead of a choc chip cookie. Sounds simple but I'm weak. :blush:


Of course, not! I drink beer or wine with meals, or within that 6 hour window I've talked about. Don't get me wrong. I don't follow the fasting rule to a tee. To me, it's a main guideline I follow and it worked so far.
 
Thank you



Awesome, Im going to try this starting today.


You may want to check out some youtube videos before you embark on it. It will show you what to do, what not to do, etc.. Pick an easy step like 16/8 first. I am doing 18/6 and has no plan to go deeper into the fasting.
 
And one more tip: I don't want my food to spend time in my intestines where it has a longer chance to be absorbed into my blood stream, so I'll eat chocolate with almonds anytime I want. There is no doubt this pushes things through. So much for carbs. :) I actually lose weight eating the chocolate w/almond bars.

Hahahhaa, I might substitute this for moms daily dose of Mira-lax.:LOL:
 
Can you imagine Ramadan? In the summer? Yeah, a friend of ours ate a meal before the sun came up and did not eat or drink until the sun set...every day during Ramadan.

I'm on board with fasting once a week or that new thing where you fast every other day. You can eat whatever you want on the day not fasting. Supposed to be good for diabetics. I understand fasting is good to clean out the system, let the cells renew. And to clean out the colon. Nothing like starting fresh.
 
I have been doing the two meals a day for years .I have a light lunch at 11 and then dinner at 5 or 6 . I have also cut my portions in half . This let me lose over 40 pounds .
 
Nice to see fasting getting some respect. If this was mentioned 5 years ago, you'd be laughed out of the room.

The link below is the premiere fasting facility in US. Peruse the sight, they have many articles to read for free. They especially have success (actual published studies) with high blood pressure.

TrueNorth Health Center
 
If you can keep the weight off, then this is a successful approach, I guess. But why not consider just eating smaller portions, vs skipping meals?

I have played a bit with IF. I mostly use 5:2 having 2 days of the week that I eat lower calories than the others. I don't necessarily get all the way down to 500, although sometimes I do. The past Friday I did 827. And quite often it is closer to 600. I don't always do it twice a week, just depends on schedule.

I read the Michael Mosley 5:2 book. Basically you do the 500 to 600 calories 2 days a week if you want to lose weight and 1 day to maintain. In my case, I lost about 60 pounds getting to the top of my normal BMI range about 2 years ago. Yes, I have been able to maintain it. I do want to lose a little more although that isn't nearly as urgent as it was to lose the 60 pounds.

So, if I can maintain a normal weight why do 5:2 or 6:1? Basically for 2 reasons.

First, I've read some of the research on intermittent fasting and it seems to have some real benefits to it from a health standpoint (note - there are some people who shouldn't do intermittent fasting so I advise consulting with a doctor first). Second, IF makes the entire rest of the week easier.

I've mostly settled into a fairly set way of eating that suits me and 1 or 2 low calorie days really help with that. On the weekends, I pretty much eat whatever. I do track calories and WW points. I haven't missed a day in tracking my food on MyFitnessPal in over 4 years. But, on weekends I don't pay too much attention to calories. I do pay some attention to it. I don't want to make the whole week difficult, but I eat pretty freely. Then Monday may be a lower calorie day for me. Monday tends to be my sort of optional day. I don't usually get down to 500 calories on that day although I do occasionally. It is more likely to be 800 calories or something like that.

Then Tuesday through Thursday or my days where I do pay quite a bit of attention to the calories that I eat. It isn't like the weekend. I basically eat on those days what will end equaling my average calories eaten per day for the week. SO, those days are just sort of the middle days.

Friday is usually my low calorie day (Occasionally due to schedule, I will do it on another day of the week). I usually will eat between 500 and 650 calories although it can be a little more depending on situation and how the rest of the week before that has gone.

But doing this on Fridays (and Mondays to a lesser extent) just makes the entire week easier. Just one day where I have a huge calorie deficit makes it so easy for the rest of the week.

I do eat quite a bit on my low calorie days. I will often have a salad with low calorie veggies and some chicken or salmon in it. I usually eat chicken breast or some sort of fish. On a low calorie day I don't usually eat until mid-afternoon so that makes it easier.

16:8 was mentioned. On my low calorie days I usually do this. That is I fit my eating into an 8 hour period starting sometime in the mid-afternoon.

I have not done Eat Stop Eat yet although I have read Brad Pilon's book on it. Remember that a 24 hour fast is not a 36 hour fast. That is some people this of at you eating dinner on, say, Monday night and then not eating until Wednesday morning. It doesn't work that way. For example a 24 hour fast can be eating a normal amount of calories until 2:00 pm on Monday and then not eating again until 2:00 pm on Tuesday. And, then eating your full calories.

Another reason to do this is that I've learned from it. I've always been the type to want to eat every couple of hours. I always had 3 meals and at least 3 snacks a day. Now, I think that is fine. I lost over 60 pounds eating that way.

But, one reason I tried this was to see if I could just not eat. That is, I often felt like I just had to eat every couple of hours and I couldn't tolerate the least amount of hunger. And, always having food every couple of hours just became a habit to me. I found that sitting at my desk I tended to always want to have something there to eat (or drink -- non-caloric of course). Now, I counted the calories so it was fine. But, I was intrigued by the idea of simply finding out if I could just not eat. And, I found that I could. At first, it felt weird. But, I became aware that eating was often just habit. And, I didn't have to eat at the first pang of hunger.

It has helped me to be much more in tune with true hunger and not just habit. The other day I was really busy the whole day and realized I hadn't eaten yet. This was in mid-afternoon. I had not planned that to be a low calorie day. But, I wasn't hungry so I ended up making it a just over 500 calorie day because I realized I just wasn't hungry.

Conversely, this Friday this week was to be a 500 to 600 calorie. But, I ate a little over 800 because I felt true hunger and decided to do that.

I am not sure that I will stick with 5:2 since I am doing more exercise now and that makes me hungrier and it doesn't work as well with my current schedule. But, I am thinking about trying out 16:8 on more days of the week and trying out a 24 hour fast. I would probably stop eating at about 5:00 PM one day and then start eating at 5:00 PM the next day.
 
One of the benefits of my w*rking life was that I wore a tie, so I had to button my top shirt button. If I started to gain weight I felt it first in my neck (that strangled feeling that comes with the top button) and so would immediately compensate by reducing caloric intake until the shirt collar was comfortable again. I was *not* going to slide down the slippery slope of shifting to larger neck sizes in my shirts. Now that I have been FIREd for two years-plus, I never use the top button of any shirt. As a result, I have gained some weight without really noticing it.

Weighing myself is a solution of course; but it is an intentional act, unlike putting on the tie every morning. I really am not wanting to face it. Reading the comments here has given me motivation to try some new approaches. Thanks, all.

-BB
 
Last edited:
2 things make something like this hard for me. I get up pretty early, and there is only so much empty stomach I can handle. The other issue is calories. I've been using a Fitbit for about 4 years. No clue how many calories I eat daily, but from the Fitbit I know how many I burn. 2000 base, yto 2500 on a very active day. I just cannot stuff all that food down in only 1 or2 meals. I have gradually lost 7 or 8 pounds over this time.

Ha
 
Last edited:
I have started intermittent fasting...

Thank you for starting this topic. :)

Since I'm blessed with the diabetes I may talk to my doc and see if I can try the 16/8 routine for starters.

_B
 
If you can keep the weight off, then this is a successful approach, I guess. But why not consider just eating smaller portions, vs skipping meals?

I believe the premise for these diets is that the timing of calorie intake matters as much if not more than the average rate of calorie intake. Traditional calorie restriction is all about reducing the average intake rate, and if I remember right this view assumes that all calories count the same (i.e. there aren't 'good calories' vs 'bad calories'). This has always been my take but apparently the Nobel committee thinks differently:
Three Americans win 2017 Nobel Prize in medicine for research on circadian clocks | PBS NewsHour
 
I tried IF for awhile and while I didn't lose much weight ,it was no problem. I never was hungry in the AM and could go till noon before eating. Energy was never a problem. Check out the site "Leangains" for a great primer on IF
 
Something I noticed about fasting is how much extra time it gives me. In that time usually spent preparing and eating food and cleaning up afterwards, I can get a number of other chores done. It's like having a couple extra hours in the day.
 
I find that I can fast well from dinner to dinner (the "eat stop eat" method, I guess) if I have an active athletic day on the 2nd day. For whatever reason I do not get hungry when very active. For example, I can play a round or 2 of golf and do fine with just water. After dinner the night before, I can go out the next day and play a round from the morning through afternoon and have no hunger. Even when I break the fast with dinner I still tend not to be too hungry so it is not a large dinner. It definitely helps keep my weight down.
 
One of the benefits I find to 16:8 is that I am much more satisfied with two larger meals than three smaller meals. Calories still have to be appropriate, of course, and it's made easier by keeping carbs to about 100g a day total, but I lost 25 lbs doing both lower carb and IF.

(Life intervened unfortunately before it became a permanent habit, so I have to start over, but I do find even now that my body's preference is eating around noon and 7:00. Just have to get the calories back under control)
 
Good thread, has me thinking about trying 16:8. I think Jimmy Kimmel credits 5:2 IF with his weight loss and keeping it off.
 
I've tried 5:2 and it has worked well for me, I more often though will go with 3 days of very low calories with the middle day being a real 500 type fast. Then the other 4, don't go nuts, but live normally.

For those asking "why not just count calories and watch what you eat" - sure that works too. But 5:2 (or 6:1 maintaining) works really well for short-term discipline, ie it's far easier for some of us to really restrict ourselves over a few days if we know that we can have that extra thingy at the weekend. If I have potato chips I can't just eat 12 and be done. But with IF I have zero, and know I can have a good portion in a few days if I really want.

I think it works a lot like interval style workouts - your body gets more out of modifying intensity during workouts than steady-pace. I think for some of us, our metabolism works the same with food intake. Mixing it up with IF can avoid (for some) the slowing down that can happen when you get in rut on a traditional lower calorie every-day diet.

It can be a trick to schedule around though. I'm not going on a long run on a fasting day.
 
Regular square meals are usually preached for health, but if you think about it, that's not what our bodies are adapted to. Our ancestors lived through feast and famine. It makes sense that the body occasionally needs a break from food.

It's great that there are articles and studies now pointing out the health benefits of short-term fasting.
 
regular square meals are usually preached for health, but if you think about it, that's not what our bodies are adapted to. Our ancestors lived through feast and famine. It makes sense that the body occasionally needs a break from food.

It's great that there are articles and studies now pointing out the health benefits of short-term fasting.

+1 If I am in doubt about diet decisions, I try and do what we believe humans did historically (more than 10k years ago).

FN
 
If I have potato chips I can't just eat 12 and be done. But with IF I have zero, and know I can have a good portion in a few days if I really want.

+1
It is far easier for me to have none than to have just a little bit.
 
I found and read a number of posts on Dr. Jason Fung’s blog (https://www.idmprogram.com/blog/), and really appreciate his detailed explanations behind how insulin drives obesity, and why IF works. I was diagnosed with T2 Diabetes last year at 43, and want to control and possibly reverse the disease. Dr. Fung is convinced that this can be accomplished with dietary changes.

I’ve been doing IF for the last 3 months. I skip breakfast and lunch, and eat dinner. I do have a couple cups of coffee with half-and-half before noon. Then I eat a low-carb, high-fat meal for dinner, eating until I’m full. A typical meal might consist of a Caesar salad with grilled chicken or steak, with full-fat dressing and Parmesan cheese. I’ll sometimes add avocado to up the fat content.

Usually I’ll stick to low-calorie beverages, but a couple nights a week will have a few beers (I’d make faster progress without them, but one still needs to live ;)). We have 3 family birthdays in September, and I indulged for each of them, but then resumed my typical eating schedule and diet.

On Monday nights, I play tennis, and that day I skip eating altogether (aside from the morning coffee). I hit the gym on Tuesday morning to lift weights, and feel just fine. I’ll eat dinner as usual on Tuesday.

So far, I’ve lost 30 pounds, and am the lightest I’ve been in my adult life (I’m down a total of 70 lbs since Jan. 2016. The high-fat dinners stave off the worst of the hunger & cravings. My A1C has dropped 3 full points, into the normal range.

I’d like to get down to my ideal weight, and then switch to a 5:2 maintenance plan. We’ll see how it goes, but I’m a firm believer in IF.
 
+1
It is far easier for me to have none than to have just a little bit.

+1 I find I can give things up with no problem, but cutting back is a little more difficult.
 
So far, I’ve lost 30 pounds, and am the lightest I’ve been in my adult life (I’m down a total of 70 lbs since Jan. 2016. The high-fat dinners stave off the worst of the hunger & cravings. My A1C has dropped 3 full points, into the normal range.

The OP here. I am very close to my weight when I was 20 something. IF has been so effective that my visceral fat level is at 6!

Additional stuff I did: I cut down on alcohol, going from 1 - 2 drinks a day to just one every other day. That probably helped in destroying my beer belly. What beer belly?
 
The OP here. I am very close to my weight when I was 20 something. IF has been so effective that my visceral fat level is at 6!


Congrats on the great results! Just curious, when you say your visceral fat level is 6, what is this a measurement of? Is it from a Dexa scan? I know what visceral fat is, but not familiar with how it’s measured.
 
Back
Top Bottom