SecondAttempt
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
I have nothing against youtube. I watch a lot of youtube. But credible does not equal correct! You (any everyone else) should verify every fact on which a decision is made. The oldest scam in the book is to establish credibility/authority then lead you down a terrible path.For youtube videos, you need to weed out the nonsense and go for channels and presenters who are credible. Further, not all discussions are "fact based". For example, many of the discussions I enjoy related to Bitcoin are more moral, philosophical or economic in nature. Rightly or wrongly, in the area of new societal trends, YouTube and Twitter etc are key resources for information dissemination. The result though, is you get a wide range and variance of quality.
Skepticism should not end once credibility has been earned. For example, I consider NPR credible. But the fact that they reported a figure today that disagrees with yahoo finance, which I also consider credible, will make me verify both of those sources before making any decisions for a while.
There are new channels that have made a business of leading people blindly down a particular path with false or dubious information. Youtube is ripe for that.