athena53
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- May 11, 2014
- Messages
- 7,383
I tried to post this in a previous thread and the computer ate it because the thread was over 262 days old.
Anyway- I have the grandchildren's 529s at EJ in accounts that can be invested in ETFs. The advisor knows I have my (significant) retirement investments elsewhere but hasn't been pushy about trying to take them over. Monday, however, I got on a Zoom meeting he set up to discuss an investment product. It turned out to be one of those mixes of individual stocks, ETFs and mutual funds determined by some set of high-priced pundits in St. Louis. It's mostly buy and hold. The number featured most prominently was 7.2%, annualized return since 2013, which is when one of the mutual funds in the product started. (Which makes me wonder if that 7.2% is a backtesting of the current mix, not actual returns- but I digress.)
I asked about any fees they raked off- oh, yeah. The 7.2% does not reflect the 1.08% Assets Under Management fee. I asked if he could send me the slides he showed me so I could look into details. He tried and they were blocked. He also didn't know if I'd be able to download values the way I can at Fidelity. (I'm guessing no- not something the typical EJ client wants to bother with. Also guessing that the actual mix at any given time is a Big Secret.)
After the discussion I went back to my Fidelity account data and calculated the annualized IRR from 1/1/2013 to date. It was 9.1%. No brain surgery- mostly a few mutual funds, more in ETFs and some well-chosen individual stocks, pretty much buy-and-hold unless there are compelling reasons to get out of something.
Bullet dodged.
Anyway- I have the grandchildren's 529s at EJ in accounts that can be invested in ETFs. The advisor knows I have my (significant) retirement investments elsewhere but hasn't been pushy about trying to take them over. Monday, however, I got on a Zoom meeting he set up to discuss an investment product. It turned out to be one of those mixes of individual stocks, ETFs and mutual funds determined by some set of high-priced pundits in St. Louis. It's mostly buy and hold. The number featured most prominently was 7.2%, annualized return since 2013, which is when one of the mutual funds in the product started. (Which makes me wonder if that 7.2% is a backtesting of the current mix, not actual returns- but I digress.)
I asked about any fees they raked off- oh, yeah. The 7.2% does not reflect the 1.08% Assets Under Management fee. I asked if he could send me the slides he showed me so I could look into details. He tried and they were blocked. He also didn't know if I'd be able to download values the way I can at Fidelity. (I'm guessing no- not something the typical EJ client wants to bother with. Also guessing that the actual mix at any given time is a Big Secret.)
After the discussion I went back to my Fidelity account data and calculated the annualized IRR from 1/1/2013 to date. It was 9.1%. No brain surgery- mostly a few mutual funds, more in ETFs and some well-chosen individual stocks, pretty much buy-and-hold unless there are compelling reasons to get out of something.
Bullet dodged.