scrubradio said:
I understand what your saying. The reason I include them as
a "cost" is because I will have to have the money to fund them
even though they will behave like an IRA.
At the point of needing them I am planning on not working so
I would have to fund them using investment returns. Therefore
I associate them with the "costs" cateogory
Am I making sense? Is there a better way to look at this?
I agree with what you said above, scrubradio. Also, for those of you who are doing HSA comparison analysis, don't forget: if you have a 'traditional' health plan, you (currently) have small co-pays. You WILL undoubtedly have SOME expenses (annual physicals, blood work, etc.) that you WILL be paying more on compared to if you had your traditional insurance plan. Therefore, to be more accurate, I would suggest estimating the average annual healthcare expenses you will pay w/ an HSA that is above what you would pay with a traditional plan, and count that as an expense against your HSA assets, along with an assumption that at least one (probably two) of the years could see you incur 'substantial' expenses that would require you covering close to all of your deductible.
The rest of the HSA assets, however, I would include as a financial investment asset as TromboneAl suggests.
case in point: I am 29, very healthy. However, in July, I got into an argument w/ my father. I screamed at the top of my lungs for a total of 5 seconds for just the second time in my life. Later that night, when I went to work out, I felt a sharp stabbing pain in my upper left rear portion of my brain. It continued during my workout (and occurred to a lesser frequency later that night) so I ended it early. I went to my internist the next day. She didn't think it was a brain anurysm, but strongly suggested an MRI to be sure. I agreed (given that I don't want to mess around with anything related to my brain). The MRI bill was $2,970, plus $390 for the radiologist to read my print out. Thanks to my HDHP, they knocked the bill down to just $1,100 for the MRI and $150 for the radiologist. My point: I am an extremely healthy 29 year old, and random small things like the above can happen (which I never would have expected). I can only imagine what could happen when I (hopefully still as healthy) reach the 55-65 bracket. While you're healthy, you might think "Oh, I won't run to the doctor for anything unless it's serious"....but when you have questions about something that you feel/experience, you're more apt to run the tests than to just brush it off.