ERD50
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Well it DID go 33,000 miles--it made it out of the lab and onto the street.
And the Jetsons would love it....
But here is the point:
The two-seater travels up to 55 mph and covers 185 miles on a fully charged battery.
...
the car is powered by solar cells that it hauls on a trailer. ...
It is much, much better for the environment to put those solar panels in a fixed place, out of the shade, and tilted optimally towards the sun. That gives more energy out, relative to the huge amount of energy it took to make the solar panel in the first place.
Their approach is actually anti-environmental, because it is not making the best use of the energy it took to make the solar panel. And it's dragging the panel around, wasting more energy.
The alternative is charge those batteries at night. Two benefits - those solar panels would be providing energy into the grid during the day when it is needed the most, and you would charge the car at night when the grid is underutilized.
Remember that it takes about two years for a solar panel, under optimal conditions, to produce the amount of energy it took to make it. So until that time, it is a net energy sink, not a 'saver' of energy. And anything you do to reduce that (like pull it around on a trailer), extends that energy payback time.
33,000 miles on the Sun's schedule - not a typical commuter schedule.
It should stay in the lab, IMO. It has no place on the street. I don't care how good you make the solar panels, they are still better off in a fixed mount, feeding the grid. So this whole exercise is pointless, it is going down the wrong path. A waste.
-ERD50