LOL!
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2005
- Messages
- 10,252
Awesome client support!
How so? My output always says "97% - 115%" no matter if I have allowed for 50% or not. I guess you are writing that 97% is the median of 10,000 runs?
There is no Y-axis label for this graph, so I cannot tell what the plot shows. Same goes for "% of failures" which I guess would use the same y-axis label.
Here's more of my inner thoughts: I am thinking that I could survive on $60K a year, but I usually spend $100K a year. I could cut out $20K of eating out and $20K of vacations pretty easily I think. So would I then making the spending adjustment multiplier some huge number?
In the output, the "Percent Expenses Funded" value (tracked per year) gives you an idea of how much pain (in the form of belt tightening) the plan is imposing on you in order to get the probability of success that's shown.
How so? My output always says "97% - 115%" no matter if I have allowed for 50% or not. I guess you are writing that 97% is the median of 10,000 runs?
Finally, if you click show "% of expenses funded" just above the graph, you can see the year-by-year effects of the spending policy overlaid on the graph.
There is no Y-axis label for this graph, so I cannot tell what the plot shows. Same goes for "% of failures" which I guess would use the same y-axis label.
Here's more of my inner thoughts: I am thinking that I could survive on $60K a year, but I usually spend $100K a year. I could cut out $20K of eating out and $20K of vacations pretty easily I think. So would I then making the spending adjustment multiplier some huge number?