“Space” is not a friendly place for humans. Until we solve the health-related issues, we shouldn’t be in too big a hurry.
Kepler also found planets "completely unlike those in our solar system," he told reporters. "Some of those, in fact, might be actual water worlds. We've also found planets that were formed at the beginning of the formation of our galaxy six-and-a-half billion years before the formation of our own star and before the formation of the Earth. Imagine what life might be like on such planets."
We are not going to confirm life on other solar systems until we send probes there. That isn't going to happen until someone figures out how to achieve near light speed travel. In my opinion, Kepler was a waste of money measuring blips passing in front of stars and astronomers speculating about massive water worlds from those blips. Deep space astronomy is far too speculative. Money could have been better spent exploring our solar system. I'm not saying there isn't life on in other planets in other solar systems, there most likely is, but the distances are too vast for us to prove it in our lifetime and generations to come. Maybe this is by design to prevent worlds from destroying each other.
Sorry, but basic science is required to advance... and the cost of this was small peanuts compared to the info acquired...
And what do you mean about exploring our solar system We do that all the time... looks like 56 missions listed just for Mars... many failed, but they cost money.... clicked on a few but did not see costs of these missions...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars
Now got curious.... this is a QUICK look at Wiki... so do not hold me to these numbers as being accurate...
2 for Mercury (least explored planet)
43 to Venus
9 for Jupiter
5 for Saturn
1 for Uranus and Neptune (at least what is listed... do not know why they said Mercury was least explored)
Now, Voyage was included in most of the outer planets so there is double (triple or more) counting...
Realize that we learn about our solar system and it’s development by looking at other solar systems in deep space. Looking at only our planets is a very narrow view.
Personally, I’m glad for all of the space research that happens. It gives us a deeper understanding of our universe.
Somehow I missed this one: A year ago, scientists discovered the first object from interstellar space that had entered our solar system (Object Oumuamua--and I'm not kidding). It exhibited some unusual behavior (motion not attributable to gravitational influence of known bodies in the solar system). Since then, experts have been trying to explain its motion. For example, after it passed our sun, it was accelerating instead of slightly decelerating due to the sun's gravity, as would be expected. At first scientists thought it was likely due to outgassing (as a comet does), but there wasn't evidence of that. A new explanation is that the motion is due to the solar wind, but this requires that the object be very thin (less than 1 mm).
At risk of sensationalizing things, one explanation is that the object is not natural--that it is an artificial object, perhaps a probe with a "solar sail." In the past, every time we've explained unusual findings as signs of life elsewhere (this happened with quasars, pulsars, etc), a much more plausible natural explanation eventually was discovered, and that will almost surely happen with Oumuamua. Still, interesting.
More here.
Author: Cjones1
It (the passing object) was comparatively slow moving for a UFO which have been clocked at speeds of 150,000 mph. I read that the Little Gray aliens reputedly originate from the Zeta Reticuli system roughly 40 light years away and the Nordic aliens from the Pleiades which are roughly 400+ light years away. Even at the clocked speed it would take hundreds of thousands to millions of years to make those journeys. It could be a remnant of a survey object created by pre-Holocene Earthlings who were forced to relocate due to the chaos and inundation that occurred when the Pleistocene glaciers melted.
https://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/insight/timeline/landing/summary/Mars Landing InSight is set to touch down on Mars at around noon Pacific (3 p.m. Eastern) on Nov. 26, 2018. The lander will plunge through the thin Martian atmosphere, heatshield first, and use a parachute to slow down. Then, it will fire its retro rockets to slowly descend to the surface of Mars, and land on the smooth plains of Elysium Planitia.