I'm down to one dog, a mut rescue. My bulldog and boxer died 3 and 1 year ago, respectively. As much as I love my dog, I'm not going to ever get another. Well, at least I say that now. They're great companions, but they're also money pits (and hell for my lawn!
). Checkups, vaccines, sick visits, food, grooming, boarding during vacation, etc. end up costing quite a bit of money in the long run. I'm not arguing against anyone else owning dogs. I'm just arguing against
me owning dogs again.
We had a vet that we really liked, private practice. We wanted to stay with him because his facility was nice, his office staff nice, and he was great. But we were being raked over the coals with each visit. Talking to friends and family with dogs, we found we were paying fully twice as much for each visit and vaccine. And with three dogs at the time, it was really getting expensive. We switched to someone else and our bill was cut in half. We found that we just didn't like that vet enough to pay those outrageous prices.
Mdlerth, my dogs had all their vaccines until Trixie died. They are likely immune for life. You can titer your dog for everything but rabies. The titer shows if your dog still has immunity. Rabies is the only required one. The vet is off the hook if I sign a waiver. If my dog bit someone they could not quarantine at home. I am not against vaccines and since it’s suspected in her death and my dogs are half siblings it’s reasonable. Two problems with vaccines as I see it is they give the same dose to a 100 lb dog as they do a 5lb one. The only difference between the 1 year or 3 year rabies shot is the label on the bottle. A vet that gave vaccines according to weight lost his license. If more vets offered titers versus vaccines they would lose money.
Animal vaccines aren't approved for doses other than standard size. While it may make sense on the surface that a smaller vaccine should be given to a smaller pet, the evidence showing it is as effective is lacking (though I'd wager to say that it probably would be effective). The only way to make sure is to give a smaller dose and then test titers. This just isn't cost effective, and adverse vaccine reactions are very unlikely, particularly serious ones.
As far as refusing a rabies vaccine for a half sibling with an immune disease that is only postulated to be related to immunizations. I'm sorry, I feel this is irresponsible for public health.
On the topic of losing money for titers:
"But titer tests often end up costing owners more than vaccines. According to Denish, a distemper-parvo battery titer costs about $76, while the vaccine is about $24. Because there is always the chance that an already paid for titer will show that a vaccination is required anyway, many owners would just as soon opt solely for the vaccination, if only for financial reasons."
https://www.petmd.com/dog/general-health/what-titer-test-and-it-right-your-pet-0