NW-Bound
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Messages
- 35,712
Correct. As we have discussed on other threads about wine tasting, our tongues can only taste salt, sweet, sour, bitter, and sometimes umami. Everything else depends on your sense of smell, your health, and your own knowledge of what scent you recognize/distinguish.
The reviews are somewhat similar, caramel is mentioned 3 out of 4, wood, oak 4 out of 4, raisins 3 out of 4, and 4 out 4 have a way with words.
If the spirit is aged in an oak barrel, of course it will smell oaky. And it is allowable for spirit makers, even French makers, to use caramel to enhance the color. And often, some lesser makers use the caramel to, ahem, cheat to improve the taste too. In fact, some may overdo it, and the sweetness is not too subtle and easily detected. Keeping this in mind, I don't think any less of a bottle of a lighter color; perhaps this is a sign of honesty rather than an inferior product.
Now I have a hankering for some Armagnac.
The reviews read much like the little descriptive placards in the modern art museum.
I read that, besides the appellation which may not mean much, an Armagnac spirit is distilled only once, while a Cognac is distilled twice or thrice. But after sufficient aging, perhaps there is not much difference.
Another thing about Cognac is that the 4 big names, namely Henessy, Martell, Courvoisier, Remy Martin, spend a lot of money on marketing and to advertise. It obviously works, because when people buy Cognac, they get one of their bottles to be safe.
On the other hand, Armagnac houses are smaller, and their bottles are less expensive due to low overhead. I will continue to try more Armagnac bottles, plus Calvados. Why pay $150 when I enjoy a $50 bottle just as much? And having a variety of bottles in my cabinet makes life more interesting.
By the way, not all the spirit sold by big Cognac houses is made in house. They buy it from small independent distillers and do the aging before bottling it to sell. It is the same as wineries buying grapes from smaller vineyards.
Back to the flowery and interesting reviewers' notes, here's one review of a domestic brandy which shall remain nameless. Perhaps too much caramel added to this brandy here?
Suffice it to say that I was incredibly surprised that this stuff was not at all bad... So sure, there are some people drinking this because it's a very price-attractive option when it comes to hammering a bottle until your legs stop working. However, I'm sure there are people besides me who would choose to drink this even when other options exist.
There's certainly a bourbon-esque influence that comes from the oak aging in terms of aroma, but the nose smells mostly of cinnamon candies and Swedish fish. And the taste? To my palate, Swedish Fish. I s*** you not. It's huge on fruit gummy flavors, which was apparently well within the realm of possibility for what kinds of flavors you can get from a grape-based spirit. I suppose it makes sense.
Drinking this brings back memories of opening up a pack of Fruit Roll-Ups on a hot playground. I'm reminded of nights spent binging on one-month-old Halloween candy (consumed warm and out of a pillowcase, of course). It's all of the bad nutritional decisions I made as a child in liquid form. It's sugary and sweet, but just adequately balanced out by a hint of wood spice.
Last edited: