It has been said that the game is the teacher. This was evident as US was held to just three goals by GK Endler of Chile. On the heals of 13-0 US drubbing of Thailand, a game with forced drama and subsequent negative reaction, lesson #1 is "You are measured by your opponent." When you're burying a team ranked at the bottom of all tournament competitors, it's difficult for a team to keep emotions in check. What can you learn for the next game, where your competitor may have a low ranking, but will probably bring a more complete game?
For rankings, see March 2019 table at
https://www.fifa.com/fifa-world-ranking/ranking-table/women/
Contrasted with Thailand game, US vs Chile had fewer fouls, same time of possession, lower shot accuracy, more corners. What was learned? We'll see in the US vs Sweden game. What lesson(s) was US coach reminding players of? Why use just 4 starters from game #1?
There are extreme challenges ahead for which you may not have the best attitude. Keeping the 3 forwards used in Thailand game out of this one was quite a surprise. I'm sure there were visions of 8 goals to be scored. But coach would have none of that, electing to play Press-Lloyd-Pugh. Watching Lloyd miss a PK was disappointing. OTH, watching Ertz finishing power on a corner was a moment. This was not a traditional approach, where starters get rewarded for previous performance, and play at least the entire half of the next game. So, time to sacrifice individual statistics, since all players are one play from being thrown in to a game for various reasons.
Thu 6/20 3PM, Sweden game will tell more. Sweden is ranked in the top ten, with more talent than seen in previous two games. Can US solve Sweden's defense?