FundManager81
Confused about dryer sheets
Hi everyone -
I don't know how unique my situation is, but I have not found many others in a similar spot, so I figured I'd post on this forum and see what comes of it!
I am 39 years olds, and manage a $5-10B mutual fund on the west coast. Though my job is interesting and very lucrative, I am getting burnt out, and my job does not lend itself to "sabbaticals"... so, essentially, you're on the treadmill until you're out of the game. The thing that the job does provide is status, financial means, and constant intellectual challenge. The thing that the job does NOT provide is two-fold: (1) a break; and (2) a sense of fulfillment re: "helping other people and making the world better."
I'm trying to figure out whether to get out of the game and "retire" in my early 40's (which, realistically, means taking at least a year or two off, and then re-assessing). This would give me a chance to travel with my family (perhaps live abroad), and it would give me a chance to simply do something new that energizes me in ways my current job does not.
The biggest question marks in my mind are:
1) Will I regret leaving a job to which so much of my identity is tied? Though I'm happy enough, this nagging feeling of un-fulfillment + greener pastures has gradually grown over the last 5 years.
2) How likely is it for me to successfully fill my time with endeavors (projects, jobs) that are genuinely emotionally fulfilling? Going from a high profile job where I'm my own boss + am surrounded by the best and the brightest, to a less visible and more ordinary job that "helps other people," can sound appealing and altruistic on paper, but am I just tricking myself into thinking that the grass is always greener?
3) How much of a "buffer" should I give myself, financially, to recognize the fact that I still have half of my life to live. Things change. People get sick, life events happen, laws and regulations change. For example, if Biden's tax plan were implemented, the after-tax yield of my passive income would be greatly reduced.
Here are a few specific statistics about me:
- Household net worth is rougly $25 million, of which $15 million is liquid assets, and $10 million is tied up in personal real estate around the world.
- Annual income is in the $5-10 million range (not a typo), before passive income such as dividends and stock appreciation.
- I have a wife and a young son. We will not have more children. He has not yet started grade school
- We live off of roughly $500k after-tax income per year. Some years less, some years more. It's an upper-class lifestyle, but not an ultra upper-class lifestyle.
- My wife is currently a stay-at-home mom, and for now, has no ambitions to return to the work-force. She could be happy travelling the world for the rest of her life (has been to 60 countries, and has lived in several).
My current thinking is to work for 2 more years, to get my liquid assets close to $25 million, and then retire around the time my son begins 1st grade. I'd force myself to take a year or two off, to give myself time to figure out where I really want to re-orient myself. We would split our time between Europe and the US (we are building a new house on the west coast... and we already own property in Europe).
The reason $25 million is our "number" is because it would allow us to live off of $500k/year at a 3% drawdown rate (750k gross, minus taxes on any capital gains or dividends). In other words, it's a level where we could SUSTAIN our current lifestyle, while still being able to grow the portfoio over time. It's important for us to sustain our lifestyle. I'm confident in the ability to generate returns of >5% per annum (historically we have done a lot better than this), whcih would result in the portfolio growing at least in-line with inflation, net of withdrawals Also, if needed, we could liquidate some of our real-estate portfolio, to flip the mix from $25mm liquid / $10mm real estate... to something closer to $30mm liquid / $5mm real estate.
The biggest risks to sustaining our lifestyle are either catastrophic health problems, or major tax hikes on the rich (does not seem unlikely to me).
The biggest reason this would be a bad decision, is that I'd end up missing the job more than I expect to + have trouble finding a replacement that's as fulfilling as I hope to find.
I don't think the idea of being worth "$100million" vs "$25million" really motivates me at this point. Money is a means to an end, not an end unto itself. And, frankly, we will soon have more than enough.
Do any thoughts jump to mind?
We are vey lucky to be in the position that we are. It all came via hard work. My net worth was negative until I turned 30, because of student loans. All of our net worth has been accumulated over the last 9 years. I had to pay for a decent chunk of my college tuition, and I never had free years in my 20's to goof off and see the world. I regret not being able to do all of those fun things, and though it's not the same at age 40 as it is at age 22, in my mind, I'd rather "make up for this lost fun" while I'm still young, rather than working until 55-60 and having less endurance + energy + passion to explore the world.
Thanks for your thoughts and advice -
FM
I don't know how unique my situation is, but I have not found many others in a similar spot, so I figured I'd post on this forum and see what comes of it!
I am 39 years olds, and manage a $5-10B mutual fund on the west coast. Though my job is interesting and very lucrative, I am getting burnt out, and my job does not lend itself to "sabbaticals"... so, essentially, you're on the treadmill until you're out of the game. The thing that the job does provide is status, financial means, and constant intellectual challenge. The thing that the job does NOT provide is two-fold: (1) a break; and (2) a sense of fulfillment re: "helping other people and making the world better."
I'm trying to figure out whether to get out of the game and "retire" in my early 40's (which, realistically, means taking at least a year or two off, and then re-assessing). This would give me a chance to travel with my family (perhaps live abroad), and it would give me a chance to simply do something new that energizes me in ways my current job does not.
The biggest question marks in my mind are:
1) Will I regret leaving a job to which so much of my identity is tied? Though I'm happy enough, this nagging feeling of un-fulfillment + greener pastures has gradually grown over the last 5 years.
2) How likely is it for me to successfully fill my time with endeavors (projects, jobs) that are genuinely emotionally fulfilling? Going from a high profile job where I'm my own boss + am surrounded by the best and the brightest, to a less visible and more ordinary job that "helps other people," can sound appealing and altruistic on paper, but am I just tricking myself into thinking that the grass is always greener?
3) How much of a "buffer" should I give myself, financially, to recognize the fact that I still have half of my life to live. Things change. People get sick, life events happen, laws and regulations change. For example, if Biden's tax plan were implemented, the after-tax yield of my passive income would be greatly reduced.
Here are a few specific statistics about me:
- Household net worth is rougly $25 million, of which $15 million is liquid assets, and $10 million is tied up in personal real estate around the world.
- Annual income is in the $5-10 million range (not a typo), before passive income such as dividends and stock appreciation.
- I have a wife and a young son. We will not have more children. He has not yet started grade school
- We live off of roughly $500k after-tax income per year. Some years less, some years more. It's an upper-class lifestyle, but not an ultra upper-class lifestyle.
- My wife is currently a stay-at-home mom, and for now, has no ambitions to return to the work-force. She could be happy travelling the world for the rest of her life (has been to 60 countries, and has lived in several).
My current thinking is to work for 2 more years, to get my liquid assets close to $25 million, and then retire around the time my son begins 1st grade. I'd force myself to take a year or two off, to give myself time to figure out where I really want to re-orient myself. We would split our time between Europe and the US (we are building a new house on the west coast... and we already own property in Europe).
The reason $25 million is our "number" is because it would allow us to live off of $500k/year at a 3% drawdown rate (750k gross, minus taxes on any capital gains or dividends). In other words, it's a level where we could SUSTAIN our current lifestyle, while still being able to grow the portfoio over time. It's important for us to sustain our lifestyle. I'm confident in the ability to generate returns of >5% per annum (historically we have done a lot better than this), whcih would result in the portfolio growing at least in-line with inflation, net of withdrawals Also, if needed, we could liquidate some of our real-estate portfolio, to flip the mix from $25mm liquid / $10mm real estate... to something closer to $30mm liquid / $5mm real estate.
The biggest risks to sustaining our lifestyle are either catastrophic health problems, or major tax hikes on the rich (does not seem unlikely to me).
The biggest reason this would be a bad decision, is that I'd end up missing the job more than I expect to + have trouble finding a replacement that's as fulfilling as I hope to find.
I don't think the idea of being worth "$100million" vs "$25million" really motivates me at this point. Money is a means to an end, not an end unto itself. And, frankly, we will soon have more than enough.
Do any thoughts jump to mind?
We are vey lucky to be in the position that we are. It all came via hard work. My net worth was negative until I turned 30, because of student loans. All of our net worth has been accumulated over the last 9 years. I had to pay for a decent chunk of my college tuition, and I never had free years in my 20's to goof off and see the world. I regret not being able to do all of those fun things, and though it's not the same at age 40 as it is at age 22, in my mind, I'd rather "make up for this lost fun" while I'm still young, rather than working until 55-60 and having less endurance + energy + passion to explore the world.
Thanks for your thoughts and advice -
FM