athena53
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- May 11, 2014
- Messages
- 7,377
In my view, subsidized federal flood insurance just encourages bad behavior. I find it hard to ask poorer people who live 30 miles inland to help generally wealthier people rebuild on the beach. If you really want to take the risk to enjoy the view, you should get commercial insurance at market prices.
As someone who worked in property-casualty insurance, but also had parents living in North Myrtle Beach (a mile from the ocean), here's what I'd like to see: when a place is pretty much totally destroyed, pay the owner the value of the property and then put it on a list of properties where no private insurer, national insurance program or FEMA will be compelled to pay for any future damages if it's rebuilt. So, you can go right ahead and exercise your God-given right to rebuild but no one is going to subsidize you any more. There are plenty of cases (a BBC documentary just interviewed one) in which the owner has received more than the market value of the property from multiple flood claims over the years.