Millennials will be richest generation

This seems to just exacerbate the problem of concentration of wealth in too few hands!
 
Between inflation and the increase in living standards, if at any time the next large-population generation does not become the richest group, something bad has happened to the economy.
 
If only society weren't full of real people it would be great

That’s a known feature of Capitalism

... not to mention socialist dictatorships, military juntas, theocracies, kleptocracies, hereditary aristocracies, etc. Pretty much any society run by elites.

I think we all are waiting for an altruocracy, but I don't suppose it's coming any time soon.
 
Before it closes a fair question that I keep pondering...when most people are rich does that make more of us poor? In other words if we have most people who have $2MM+ does that mean the $1MM folks are poor? and what does that actually affect? does the cost go up for everyone?
 
Well, I hope they, and those even younger, inherit a healthy planet along with wealth. Wealth is immaterial if half the country is on fire, and the other half is flooded.
 
I really wish I shared optimism of some of you. Student loan debt, high housing costs, fancy cars and the desire to get it all now (not later) are negatives.

We have 4 children, and only one is fiscally responsible enough to invest in their future. I raised a niece and nephew who run in high social circles--with my niece living in a very expensive house and driving a Lexus--both paid for by her father.

My hat's off to the younger generations that have their lives going in a positive direction, and those that will earn the resources to take care of themselves in retirement.
 
Well, I hope they, and those even younger, inherit a healthy planet along with wealth. Wealth is immaterial if half the country is on fire, and the other half is flooded.

So true, that!!!!!
 
I really wish I shared optimism of some of you. Student loan debt, high housing costs, fancy cars and the desire to get it all now (not later) are negatives.

We have 4 children, and only one is fiscally responsible enough to invest in their future. I raised a niece and nephew who run in high social circles--with my niece living in a very expensive house and driving a Lexus--both paid for by her father.

My hat's off to the younger generations that have their lives going in a positive direction, and those that will earn the resources to take care of themselves in retirement.
“The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.”
Socrates
 
“The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.”

Socrates


+1

“The more things change, the more they stay the same”
 
One thing they didn't take into consideration, is that a lot of boomers had children who are of Generation-X (born 1965-1982). So, it's not a given that the bulk of that $68.4T bill be going to the Millennials. Heck, do they even really lay out what a "Millennial" is? For the longest time it was someone born 1983-2000, although I've seen them play fast and loose with this age range, to fit whatever narrative is being pushed.

Plus, aren't many of the younger boomers still often getting sandwiched in that spot where they're taking care of their aging parents, yet at the same time subsidizing their kids? That's probably going to eat up a lot of that $68.4T.

My parents' generation is mostly older boomers. Dad was born in 1946, Mom in 1949. My stepdad was born in 1952. So was my uncle, who doesn't have any kids, and made me his sole heir. My Dad has two brothers that are are a bit older (1939 and 1940), so they're actually from the "Greatest Generation", although I tend to lump them in with my Mom, Dad, and uncle, since they're of my parents' age range, rather than my grandparents'.

I wonder if there's much of a breakdown in wealth between the older Boomers, which are more likely to have Gen-X kids, and later Boomers, which are more likely to have Millennial kids.

I think the older Boomers might be wealthier, for several reasons. First, their parents were probably a bit more likely to have a good pension, and good health insurance. I know all my grandparents did, so as they aged, got sick and passed away, they didn't run up much in the way of medical bills. And their kids went to college at a time when tuitions were lower, and you didn't have quite the "failure to launch" problem of the kids not leaving the nest. But, the younger Boomers might not be so lucky.

I have a feeling it might be Gen-X that gets the bulk of that $68.4T. Of course, they eventually pass it on to somebody. And again, the older members of that group, will probably pass it on to a Millennial. I didn't have kids, but if I did, it would have been back in the mid 90's, so they would have been Millennials. But a later Gen-Xer probably ended up having an X-ennial, or whatever they're calling the latest bunch.
 
Once Millennials finally become the “richest” generation, they will also be the “oldest” generation lol
 
Well, no "Ok Boomer" responses yet. :)

LFhcHuB.jpg
 
Well, I hope they, and those even younger, inherit a healthy planet along with wealth. Wealth is immaterial if half the country is on fire, and the other half is flooded.
I hope so too.
 
Well, I hope they, and those even younger, inherit a healthy planet along with wealth. Wealth is immaterial if half the country is on fire, and the other half is flooded.


+1


Cheers!
 
Somehow these kinds of predictions don’t seem to be as accurate as promised. “Japan will own the world, robots are going to take all the jobs, cold fusion will make free energy, and Millennials are going to be so rich and lazy they will vote for socialism.” And where is my jet pack?
 
Somehow these kinds of predictions don’t seem to be as accurate as promised. “Japan will own the world, robots are going to take all the jobs, cold fusion will make free energy, and Millennials are going to be so rich and lazy they will vote for socialism.” And where is my jet pack?


+1
 
Millions ain't what it once was, even in our lifetimes..


To have the buying power of $1,000,000 in 1960 you would need about $8,700,000 now. + or - 1%
 
My mom grew up dirt poor in Sardegna, Italy pre WWII...they didn't even have plumbing. But she said she never felt poor until she moved to the USA, where she had much much more than she ever dreamed of in Sardegna, but she saw so many other people with so much more.
 
I continue to be annoyed at the lack of flying cars. Although it is probably just as well that they aren't everywhere.

And where is my jet pack?
 
Back
Top Bottom