I don't remember anyone here increasing their stock allocation percentage in 2008, though I'm not known for my memory. I thought a few did the opposite, or couldn't stand even normal rebalancing into equities.
In my case, I had no bonds but had gone to 30% cash in 2007 just before retiring. Excluding the cash I was 100% equities, and that was my long-term allocation. I was concerned not so much about housing but the negative savings rate, and a possible downturn right as I retired.
During 2008 & 2009 I used chunks of cash to buy equities algorithmically as the market reached new lows. At the final 2009 low I was about out of cash, other than a few months of living expenses. So I was always sort of "100% equities", just adding to them from cash that was never part of my long-term allocation plan.
In my case, I had no bonds but had gone to 30% cash in 2007 just before retiring. Excluding the cash I was 100% equities, and that was my long-term allocation. I was concerned not so much about housing but the negative savings rate, and a possible downturn right as I retired.
During 2008 & 2009 I used chunks of cash to buy equities algorithmically as the market reached new lows. At the final 2009 low I was about out of cash, other than a few months of living expenses. So I was always sort of "100% equities", just adding to them from cash that was never part of my long-term allocation plan.