always_learning
Recycles dryer sheets
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 267
Thanks for your reply and the details. We're looking more in-depth at the various amounts and thinking about what to do so this is helpful.After tax contributions are eligible to be rolled into a ROTH IRA. Earnings on after tax contributions are treated like pre-tax contributions and can be rolled into a traditional IRA.
That is:
401k Pre-Tax withdraw => Ordinary Income (or roll to traditional IRA)
401k After-Tax contribution withdraw => Not taxed (return of principal) (or roll to ROTH IRA)
401k After-Tax earnings withdraw => Ordinary Income (or roll to traditional IRA)
Now, here's the rub: You can't just take out (or roll over) the after tax contributions without also withdrawing the earnings on those contributions. For example, let's say your account had $100K, 50K pre-tax + earnings, 20K after-Tax, and 30K after-tax earnings. If you distributed $10K, 80% of the 10K (8K) would be considered ordinary income.
Further complicating things: If you are considering traditional to ROTH IRA conversions and have any after tax (i.e. non-deductible) IRA's, all of the IRA's are considered together when determining the % that is after tax. This article explains it further: https://rodgers-associates.com/blog/pro-rata-rule/
I'm making notes on everyone's replies and trying to figure out what will be the best course of action.
Thanks for asking. Is this the best course of action? I honestly have no idea. Our thoughts were that we would have more investing options going forward and we could take advantage of highly-appreciated co. stock. While we aren't unhappy with the company's performance, we feel the amount in there is worth using the NUA for the tax bonus and decide if/when to sell the actual stock. To take advantage of the NUA we have to liquidate the 401k.90 degrees to the discussion, have you confirmed that rolling over is the best choice? I'm sure you have more options for investment in other brokerage accounts. In my case, I rolled over some but kept some in my 401(k). My 401(k) had a guaranteed income fund which I liked. Keeping my company stock in the 401(k) made sense to me at the time and added some flexibility since I WANTED to keep my Megacorp stock.
Other practical issues of 401(k)s. My understanding is they are the most secure from being taken from you in a civil judgement. Others may have more info on this, but I think some states may have allowed civil judgments with IRAs but don't quote me.
Honestly, I have found my 401(k) to be WAY easier to manipulate (by phone or the Net) than even Vanguard where virtually all my IRAs are maintained.
I mention all of this ONLY to suggest you convince yourself there are too few reasons to keep all or part of your funds within your particular 401(k). Maybe I'm just lucky (or, heck, maybe I'm wrong) but I am really happy with a good chunk of my funds STILL in the 401(k) 15 years after FIRE.
As always and more than ever this is very much a YMMV.
As for the guaranteed income fund, we are mostly growth investors with some more aggressive funds than what the 401k offers and won't (shouldn't!) need the guaranteed income from the smallish amount we would keep in there.
So, as I said, I have no idea if it's the right choice, but I think it is?