New book about SS: "Get What's Yours"

I have to admit that I am wary of clicking on links if I don't know what they are. This looks like it might be a shortened form of a link to something on Amazon. A brief description of what it is would be helpful please. Perhaps a line or two letting us know what you thought of it?
 
It's an Amazon link to the book mentioned in OP's title. A review of the book would be nice. :)
 
I have to admit that I am wary of clicking on links if I don't know what they are. This looks like it might be a shortened form of a link to something on Amazon. A brief description of what it is would be helpful please. Perhaps a line or two letting us know what you thought of it?
Amazon.com: Get What's Yours: The Secrets to Maxing Out Your Social Security (9781476772295): Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Philip Moeller, Paul Solman: Books

That appears safer. Gets to the same page.

Here is the author bio:

Laurence J. Kotlikoff | Laurence Kotlikoff

If you hover over the link, and check the status bar, I think you'll be ok with these links.
 
I'm not sure how they can make a whole book out of this subject. There is one review on Amazon's site (favorable) and this pretty much sums up the contents of the book:


The most important tip is to wait until 70 before taking benefits. The next most important tip is to register at 66, but at the same time suspend benefits until 70. This not only allows your rate to grow 8% a year for four years, but it also allows your spouse to claim spousal benefits (half of yours) until s/he reaches 66 and can claim benefits. There are a lot of ifs ands and buts, so the book becomes a tremendous resource. The answers are clear and cogent.


The excerpt from the back cover blurb goes on about how few Americans can actually afford to wait till age 70, which is preaching to the choir here. The book probably is useful for special situations such as benefits for dependent children, disability, etc. but a review of the many threads here would probably serve the needs of most of us.
 
Thank you everyone. REW - I'm getting "Page not found" from your link, but target2019's worked.
 
Is recommending books with affiliate referral links permitted on this forum?
 
I have to admit that I am wary of clicking on links if I don't know what they are. This looks like it might be a shortened form of a link to something on Amazon. A brief description of what it is would be helpful please. Perhaps a line or two letting us know what you thought of it?

Especially from a poster with only 3 posts....spooky.
 
I'm 6'6" and weigh 260lbs. With my size and family history, I will be lucky to see 80. I'm taking ss @ 62. BTW, I won't/don't need the money so it is sort of irrelevant. DW is six yrs younger and should live until 90. She will wait until 70 to take her's.
 

I clicked another link in this thread and that does look like a very helpful source for people deciding when to claim and why. Thanks for leading us to it (I hope you realize no one is quibbling about the book, just pointing out that a brief description of a link's target and why you think we might want to read it is important for many/most of us before we click on the link).

Welcome to the forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mod note - The link in the OP was replaced with a direct link to the publisher and book title.
 
I'm not sure how they can make a whole book out of this subject. There is one review on Amazon's site (favorable) and this pretty much sums up the contents of the book:





The excerpt from the back cover blurb goes on about how few Americans can actually afford to wait till age 70, which is preaching to the choir here. The book probably is useful for special situations such as benefits for dependent children, disability, etc. but a review of the many threads here would probably serve the needs of most of us.

It's funny that the user review says the most important thing is to wait until 70 while the back cover copy says few Americans can afford to wait until 70.

The book's pub date is today--probably more reviews will be posted soon.
 
Yeah, sorry folks. I understand your concerns. I'm a legit person, though, who just hasn't had time to introduce myself. Soon!
I just wanted to post the link to the book to start a discussion. I'm not retired yet don't have much free time. I have nothing to do with Amazon sales. I just shortened the link using bitly so it didn't look so unwieldly.
Honestly, just heard on the story on NPR on the way to work and wanted to post before I forgot!.
Thx, and I'll be more thorough next time! :)
 
Yes, that too. Sorry dadu007 - we're a bunch of conservative types around here. It's how we got to ER :LOL:

Agreed. Poor guy just wants to put out some info. All he gets is, Suspicious link, hey, how bout reviewing the book first, against forum rules, you're new and can't be trusted.
 
Thanks for the tip - I had about $10 in unused Amazon credits, and the Kindle version of this book fits perfectly. Plus, I'm deep into my retirement planning strategies, and the information will likely plug a hole in my knowledge.

:flowers:
 
It's an Amazon link to the book mentioned in OP's title. A review of the book would be nice. :)
You could take a huge risk and go to the Amazon site and read the one there. Alternatively, double clap and a Genii may appear and recite one to you.
 
Agreed. Poor guy just wants to put out some info. All he gets is, Suspicious link, hey, how bout reviewing the book first, against forum rules, you're new and can't be trusted.

I think most of us understand that and can sympathize.

However I also think most of us (here and outside of this forum) have been bitten by clicking on something and then having weeks of mess to clean up as a result. "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you"
 
^^^ Agreed but you have to admit, you start reading this thread and all the upfront responses are just trying to come up with negative "what can go wrong" responses, most of which could be resolved my just stepping aside and doing a very small amount of research.
 
from the extended comments, this caught my eye:

For such a couple, collecting Social Security at 62 represents a $1.2 million asset. In other words, you’d need a nest egg of $1.2 million to produce the same amount of annual income that you’ll get from Social Security, assuming you could safely earn 2 percent a year above inflation on your investments.

Now, $1.2 million is more than many upper-middle-income retirees have saved by retirement age. The net worth of a typical household headed by someone aged 65 to 69 is only a fourth of this amount and much of it is in the value of their home. And all you have to do is stay alive and those Social Security payments will keep coming each and every month—payments guaranteed by the United States government and protected against inflation. That’s because every January, you get, by law, annual benefit raises that equal the prior year’s rate of inflation.1

Moreover, there is a huge amount of money at stake in maximizing one’s Social Security benefits. The $1.2 million valuation, large as it is, actually assumes our 60-year-old couple makes the wrong Social Security benefit collection decisions. It assumes they take their retirement benefits as early as possible and forgo cashing in on what are, to them, free spousal benefits like the one Paul took. If they make the right decisions, they can increase the value of their lifetime Social Security “asset” by more than $400,000, to $1.6 million!
 
^^^^ A discussion might break out? At least I come to understand a bit more in each conversation.

I don't mind doing some research for others.
 
^^^ Agreed but you have to admit, you start reading this thread and all the upfront responses are just trying to come up with negative "what can go wrong" responses, most of which could be resolved my just stepping aside and doing a very small amount of research.
Or they could just be asking the OP to do what everyone else is asked to do when posting on the forum: don't post naked links and provide information about what the heck you are linking to. IOW, common courtesy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom