gayl
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
+1Waiting for the dust to settle before making any planning, decisions or further discussions .
+1Waiting for the dust to settle before making any planning, decisions or further discussions .
I forgot another obvious one. No recharacterizations (in both bills), so you'll need to be sure of your Trad/Roth decisions when you make them.
I'm watching the changes to retirement plans. I believe the Senate bill combines the 457b limit with the 401k/403b limit so I could now contribute $24.5k=$18.5k+$6k total, instead of $24.5k to 403b and another $24.5k to 457b (total $49k). (These are on top of 401a, IRAs, HSA - I tax defer most of my income).
In response I would totally change how I contribute to Trad, Roth, taxable. I've looked at the numbers, and planned accordingly, so I'm just waiting to see what the final tax law is.
There were other proposed changes to retirement plans, e.g. they were going to impose the 10% early withdrawals penalty on 457b plans, but that was stricken. So (as things stand) 457b plans will still be a penalty-free source of funding for early retirees below age 55.
I forgot another obvious one. No recharacterizations (in both bills), so you'll need to be sure of your Trad/Roth decisions when you make them.
It is nearly a "no-brainer" for charity donors to go this year. I don't want to wait. I'm already past the standard deduction for this year, so why not donate and get the benefit?
In future years, I'll likely bunch 3 years together using my DAV to distribute them out over 3 years.
I found this site helpful.
Tax Plan Calculator by Maxim Lott
maybe too simplistic for some.
The Standard Deduction, dropping the ACA requirement and giving a break on pass through llc, will all be big savings for me.
At 66 and retired, I have relatively little income and have been relying on selling appreciated assets in an after tax account which is down to about $80K with annual spending of ~$50K. Not yet drawing SS but considering whether or not to do so. The bulk of my net worth apart from the house is in traditional IRAs (~1.1M) and Roth (~$200K) so I'm thinking this may be an opportunity to pull out extra IRA funds (via Roth conversion and/or into after tax account.) It may pay to do this sooner than later if these tax cuts are only temporary. i-orp now includes a calculation based on the House bill so hopefully they'll have one soon for the Senate and then final bills.This will probably be good for stocks at least in the short run so maybe should consider upping the equity asset allocation.
I found this site helpful.
Tax Plan Calculator by Maxim Lott
maybe too simplistic for some.
The Standard Deduction, dropping the ACA requirement and giving a break on pass through llc, will all be big savings for me.
Any idea when the prohibition on recharacterizations is effective? IOW, does it prohibit 2018 recharacterizations of conversions made in 2017? or just 2019 recharacterizations of conversions made in 2018?
https://www.thestreet.com/story/143...ill-can-hurt-your-retirement-investments.htmlOn the other hand, if you've already fouled up a conversion in 2017, you may be running out of time to undo that transaction. The GOP's bill will eliminate these Roth "do-overs."
"You might want to consider that recharacterization," said Levine of BluePrint Wealth Alliance. "Your last shot might be Dec. 31."
If I don't hear anything definitive, I'm going to recharacterize this month.Luscombe [Mark Luscombe, a principal analyst with Wolters Kluwer] noted that the most significant proposed change in the retirement area, from his perspective, is the elimination of recharacterizations of Roth contributions and conversions effective after 2017. "This could mean that an individual who thought they had until October 2018 to do a recharacterization might have to do it before year-end 2017," he said.
I found this site helpful.
Tax Plan Calculator by Maxim Lott
maybe too simplistic for some.
The Standard Deduction, dropping the ACA requirement and giving a break on pass through llc, will all be big savings for me.
The Sched A medical deduction that was to have gone away appears to not only be retained, but also available to more people because the qualifying threshhold is dropping from 10% AGI to 7.5%, but just for 2 years.
Set up a DAF and portion it out equally over the four years? Or are you gifting directly from the IRA (which can't go to a DAF)?Right, and I am taking more income this year and less next year anyway, so it should be a 30% deduction this year, and 0% next year. I just hope those charities realize they are getting about 4 years worth at once, and not to count on the larger amount each year! If I can I'm going to note that on my donations.
Not quite. The 10% requirement was in place for people under 65 several years ago.This is just rolling the law back to where it was in 2016.
For TY 2016, only medical expenses beyond 7.5% AGI were deductible. The threshold went up to 10% for TY 2017.
Ultimately this is exactly what some people will do - buy slightly different versions of an asset class so that they have some control over the basis.If the FIFO stock sale requirement makes it into the final bill, tax loss harvesting would not work unless the loss is in the first tax lot, or if the loss is large enough that you can sell through the earliest lots to reach the lots with losses.
Alternatively, this could encourage investors to invest in a different ETF for each asset class, e.g. for US LargeCap: VV, VOO, SCHX, IVV, SCHK, MGC, VONE, IWB, SPLG, SPY. The idea is to switch to a new ETF whenever there is major advancement in the asset class. E.g. if I am investing in VV, after a 10% rise in VV, I would switch to the next ETF VOO when I have new funds for investment. In this way, when there is a fall in US LargeCap, I can sell VOO to tax loss harvest without needing to sell the earlier VV shares.
The TLH features touted by the robo advisors like Wealthfront or Betterment would not work easily anymore.
Not quite. The 10% requirement was in place for people under 65 several years ago.
Anybody agree or disagree with this? Opinions welcome.The Senate bill also calls for seven brackets but changes the rates on taxable income to:
- 10% (income up to $9,525 for individuals; up to $19,050 for married couples filing jointly)
- 12% (over $9,525 to $38,700; over $19,050 to $77,400 for couples)
- 22% (over $38,700 to $70,000; over $77,400 to $140,000 for couples)
- 24% (over $70,000 to $160,000; over $140,000 to $320,000 for couples)
- 32% (over $160,000 to $200,000; over $320,000 to $400,000 for couples)
- 35% (over $200,000 to $500,000; over $400,000 to $1 million for couples
- 38.5% (over $500,000; over $1 million for couples)
The House bill, by contrast, only calls for four brackets: 12%, 25%, 35% and 39.6%.
Set up a DAF and portion it out equally over the four years? Or are you gifting directly from the IRA (which can't go to a DAF)?
I'm not sure how the FIFO, no SpecID, thing would work in practice. It seems you could shift assets between brokerages, so no brokerage could know your when all purchases were made, so they practically couldn't report for FIFO.
Hmmm, that's a really good idea. I've been lazy in my gifting and just do it from my checking account or credit card. I'm taking a large LTCG this year, maybe I should put some of that in a DAF and disburse it over a few years. That shouldn't be too hard to set up in the next 3 weeks, should it? I'd probably use VG since that's where my account and the fund I'm liquidating is. I'm going to check it out.
We strongly suggest making your grant recommendations and contributions as soon as possible to avoid any potential delays.
Security held outside of Vanguard December 15, 2017
Assets held at Vanguard December 21, 2017
Wire or Electronic Bank Transfer December 26, 2017
Check or Stock Certificate December 31, 2017