Koolau
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
The two major differences I see in opportunities between now and when I started my c*reer are: Pensions are less likely and one-company-for-c*reer are almost non existent now. I had both pension and one-company. That DID make it easier to do the MND thing. Having said that, staying within one company (most companies) means that your path is only variable within certain limits. "Good" performers get to the next rung faster then "average" performers. BUT there are few if any opportunities for "quantum" leaps.
Under the current paradigm, good performers can leap-frog companies and get to much more lucrative positions faster than staying within one company. Loyalty is no longer particularly valued by empl*yees or empl*yers.
True, it may take some luck to leap-frog, but acquired skills and selling yourself are more important than luck today. The rules ARE different, but I just don't buy that its a lot more difficult to become MND today. As always, YMMV.
Under the current paradigm, good performers can leap-frog companies and get to much more lucrative positions faster than staying within one company. Loyalty is no longer particularly valued by empl*yees or empl*yers.
True, it may take some luck to leap-frog, but acquired skills and selling yourself are more important than luck today. The rules ARE different, but I just don't buy that its a lot more difficult to become MND today. As always, YMMV.