I just spent a few hours running various retirements withdrawal scenarios based on variance of returns and I got quite a shock. Some of you may already know this but I was surprised at how drastic the effect is.
Here are my actual 401k returns for the past 8 years:
2001.....-3.9%
2002.....-11%
2003......34.7%
2004......16.9%
2005......14.6%
2006......16.8%
2007......14.8%
2008......-5.9%
Total return is 8.2% not accounting for regular deposits.
Lets assume there are 3 of us retiring on the same day. We all have the same amount of money and we all will withdraw the same amounts over the next 8 years.
Person A will get these exact returns as listed
Person B gets a constant 8.2% return
Person C gets the listed returns in reverse order
The starting portfolio amount and withdraw amounts arent really important since they are all the same. The final results is whats interesting / scary.
Person A ends his 8 years with $640000
Person B ends his 8 years with $736000
Person C ends his 8 years with $865000
Person C has 35% more money than Person A and they both the exact same cumulative 8.2% return over 8 years.
Having seen this, I have alot more retirement planning to do. Its quite unsettling. I had no idea the variance was this high from just a few years with only one drastically high year and one pretty bad year. Both scenarios (standard order and reverse order) start and end with a down year but that second bad year at the beginning for Person A is a killer.
Comments?
Suggestions how to dampen this effect?
Here are my actual 401k returns for the past 8 years:
2001.....-3.9%
2002.....-11%
2003......34.7%
2004......16.9%
2005......14.6%
2006......16.8%
2007......14.8%
2008......-5.9%
Total return is 8.2% not accounting for regular deposits.
Lets assume there are 3 of us retiring on the same day. We all have the same amount of money and we all will withdraw the same amounts over the next 8 years.
Person A will get these exact returns as listed
Person B gets a constant 8.2% return
Person C gets the listed returns in reverse order
The starting portfolio amount and withdraw amounts arent really important since they are all the same. The final results is whats interesting / scary.
Person A ends his 8 years with $640000
Person B ends his 8 years with $736000
Person C ends his 8 years with $865000
Person C has 35% more money than Person A and they both the exact same cumulative 8.2% return over 8 years.
Having seen this, I have alot more retirement planning to do. Its quite unsettling. I had no idea the variance was this high from just a few years with only one drastically high year and one pretty bad year. Both scenarios (standard order and reverse order) start and end with a down year but that second bad year at the beginning for Person A is a killer.
Comments?
Suggestions how to dampen this effect?