The problem I have with good fund families like American is the front end load. I just can't past the upfront load.
Well, unfortunately that's the case. However, they give some healthy breakpoints once you get up to $100K or more. I have a fair number of clients that put $500,000 into them, so they pay a one-time load of 2% or $10,000. That still is NOT an insignificant amount of money, but IMO it beats doing their C shares, which does not charge an upfront load but adds about 1% of internal expenses which go on for 10 years. If there is a "good thing" about that, it's that AF has made the decision (the only company I know) to automatically switch those shares to F shares after 10 years, at which point they quit paying 12b-1's and the ER drops even more.
DFA is another good family but having to fork over .5-1% of my assets in year to an advisor, who may or man not know more about investing than I do, is none starter for me.
I have inquired about DFA, they really grill you and put you through the ringer to get "invited" to be in their program as a DFA "preferred advisor". Along with spending $3000 to be belittled at DFA headquarters, along with making a written commitment to HOW MUCH business you will do in DFA. I have heard from a couple advisors that DFA "suggests" you drop all your other fund companies and use them exclusively.............not sure how I feel about that..........
The biggest problem with active funds, is I think it requires three smart choices. First you have to be able to figure out who in advance is going to out perform the market in the future, than you have be the add expenses for active management, then you have to be smart enough to figure out when to get out.
I used to think that as an individual investor, and that still holds true. However, since I now manage a lot of money for others, I have changed my philosophy. I think we can all agree that while folks are ON THEIR WAY to financial independence, they would like to get there ASAP, and the RIGHT investment strategy can help accelerate the process. What I have found is that when people reach FI, the mindset changes somewhat. It may be different on this board, but I am talking my experience in general. They aren't as concerned with OUTPERFORMING as much as they are concerned with getting hurt in a bad market. So they go from a capital appreciation mindset to a capital preservation mindset. As such, they are not as performance minded as they once were.
The reason I use AF exclusively for my MF holdings is the following:
1)They are buy-and-hold investors, and love dividend paying stocks
2)They keep expenses low, and most funds have a minimum of 5 managers on it, so there's no "Hot" manager to chase
3)They have low turnover
4)They will underperform somewhat in screaming bull markets, but do extremely well in poor markets, and most of their funds run at a beta of .85-.90.
5)Their customer service is excellent for the client and advisor.
Over long periods of time, they approach the return of the index funds (I did NOT SAY BEAT), and most folks would "take that". I don't expect anyone on here to agree with that, but I think we need to remember the folks on this forum are in the top 1/10 of 1 percent of financial literate folks in the USA, and most other folks have no clue about investing, they count on "luck" to make things work..........