I heard about this book on NPR and although I haven't read it yet, the thesis resonated with me. I joined a corporate training program out of college where we moved every 6 months. After graduate school, I joined a firm where moving every couple of years is expected, but I haven't made my first move yet. I didn't much care for relocating when I was single, but doing it while married presents a new set of pros and cons. At least you will know at least one person when you get to your new city! But it becomes much more difficult for the spouse to maintain his/her career. I don't know what our siutation will be when the call comes to move at some point in the future. We have discussed it but not come to any firm conclusions (my previous thread on the subject is here, I ended up taking the job). The dissappointing thing is that it seems like you could be subject to relo at any big company (my current employer is more candid about it than most). But the jobs that offer the most interesting (intellectually stimulating) assignments and the best compensation are often given to those most willing to relocate.
Back in the day when communications were slow, I can understand that a company run by John Smith would want to have someone he knew well in charge of the Madagascar office. These days, you can instantly communicate with anyone around the world, no matter how remote, via phone and email. Scanned documents travel instantly across the internet. So what is really accomplished by relocating someone's family to Malaysia for 3 years that they couldn't do from the home office? Of course there's no substitute for "being there" in some situations, but if you really need to see someone, you can always get on a plane and be there in less than 24 hours. Sure, being flexible on location makes it easier to take the "perfect" next job that you need to keep moving up the ladder.
What have your experiences been with relocating? Is excessive relocation just a relic of the old days of corporate command-and-control structures?
Back in the day when communications were slow, I can understand that a company run by John Smith would want to have someone he knew well in charge of the Madagascar office. These days, you can instantly communicate with anyone around the world, no matter how remote, via phone and email. Scanned documents travel instantly across the internet. So what is really accomplished by relocating someone's family to Malaysia for 3 years that they couldn't do from the home office? Of course there's no substitute for "being there" in some situations, but if you really need to see someone, you can always get on a plane and be there in less than 24 hours. Sure, being flexible on location makes it easier to take the "perfect" next job that you need to keep moving up the ladder.
What have your experiences been with relocating? Is excessive relocation just a relic of the old days of corporate command-and-control structures?