Member List

W

Westernskies

Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Joined
May 5, 2008
Messages
3,864
Question on Members List

I was perusing the members list (been kinda slow on the Forums lately;)) and noticed that we have hundreds of members who either:

A. Joined and never came back
B. Have never posted
C. Posted once and never returned
D. Have not visited the Forum in several years.
E. A and B
F. C and D
G B and D
H. Have voluntarily left the forum
I. have involuntarily left the forum (Don't get excited, this is not a sentence :D)

Is there a reason why we have so many members who clearly aren't participating? Is ad revenue based on number of members, like those expired magazine subscriptions I can't seem to cancel? The membership rolls seem bloated; would it be in our best interests to clean them up?- would make it easier to find someone specific without having to scroll thru page after page of folks who have clearly left the forum.
 
Westernskies said:
Is there a reason why we have so many members who clearly aren't participating?
Click to expand...
One of the mysteries of internet forums is why some only lurk and some post...and post..and post. (Who, me?).
Westernskies said:
Is ad revenue based on number of members, like those expired magazine subscriptions I can't seem to cancel?
Click to expand...
I'll defer this one to Andy or Janet. I don't have a clue.
Westernskies said:
The membership rolls seem bloated; would it be in our best interests to clean them up?- would make it easier to find someone specific without having to scroll thru page after page of folks who have clearly left the forum.
Click to expand...
Andy does this periodically. I know that earlier this month he deleted several hundred "dead" accounts.
 
No, the ad revenue is not based on those metrics.

How about we change the settings for the member list so it hides everyone who has not posted? That should make the list much smaller.
 
Andy R said:
No, the ad revenue is not based on those metrics.

How about we change the settings for the member list so it hides everyone who has not posted? That should make the list much smaller.
Click to expand...

Can we go one step further and hide everyone who has not posted for a certain period of time...say a year or two?

R
 
Sorry, out-of-the-box the software does not have an option like that.
 
Andy R said:
How about we change the settings for the member list so it hides everyone who has not posted? That should make the list much smaller.
Click to expand...
I know several members who've joined the board to be added as members of a social group or to correspond by PM.

I know a couple other members who've joined (for the "Member since 2004" byline) but who are easily identified IRL and won't decloak until they leave deworkplace.

So I'd rather be able to find a member regardless of whether or not they've posted.

Does vBulletin have tools to allow users to further search/filter the memberlist? Personally I find it quite annoying to not be able to find the banned members. Some of their posts are worth re-reading or even quoting but I can't remember all the usernames, let alone all their idiosyncratic spellings. We had one member of the E-R.org Hall of Shame resurface on another board and it was a real pain to work with this board's memberlist to figure it out.
 
Nords said:
Personally I find it quite annoying to not be able to find the banned members.
Click to expand...

Coming here late, I miss out on all the feuds, though have seen some obviously milder ones that did not result in any expulsion. Anyway, it would be nice to read old postings like that on rainy days. Oops, rainy days are quite rare here. :)
 
Westernskies said:
Is there a reason why we have so many members who clearly aren't participating?
Click to expand...
I'd venture one.

Not much has changed for the SIRE crowd, but I'd bet a good chunk of the active FIRE members had the net worth they felt necessary to retire in the fall of 2007, so they were actively planning to retire early - including posting here frequently. Since then, that group may no longer have the net worth and/or the confidence in the future to retire, and their target date has been considerably postponed. Their focus has now turned back to work or other interests, they don't want to read/hear about folks who are still planning to retire soon or those who have already. My 2¢...
 
Midpack, I agree.

Forums, for the most part, have 1% highly active posters, 9% post up to around 10 times and 90% who just lurk.
 
Andy R said:
Forums, for the most part, have 1% highly active posters, 9% post up to around 10 times and 90% who just lurk.
Click to expand...

Andy, you are so right. Other forums that I belong to have just as big a percentage of lurkers as this one. There are no surprises here.

Nords said:
I know a couple other members who've joined (for the "Member since 2004" byline) but who are easily identified IRL and won't decloak until they leave deworkplace.
Click to expand...

Lurkers who have not joined also have to wade through the initial ad that non-members see, which takes a while to load on some computers. That is another reason to join even if one only intends to lurk.

My heart goes out to those whose ER dreams have collapsed along with the economy. You will recover those dreams, in time.
 
Has the members list disappeared from the site?
And our top poster now has only 84 posts?

The conspiracy theorists among us want to know what is up with that...;)
 
Westernskies said:
Has the members list disappeared from the site?
And our top poster now has only 84 posts?

The conspiracy theorists among us want to know what is up with that...;)
Click to expand...

Just because you're a paranoid psychotic doesn't mean there's not a conspiracy against you, you know.

:D
 
Bestwifeever said:
Just because you're a paranoid psychotic doesn't mean there's not a conspiracy against you, you know.

:D
Click to expand...

I believe the members list was taken away by the guys in the black helicopters under a secret UN program to put us all back to work ....
but, hey that's just me.:whistle:
 
CuppaJoe said:
Looks like the 84 post count is for the last seven days only. I also remember much higher numbers.:)
Click to expand...
You are correct. The Top 10 stats used to show all time numbers. On another site we were setting up the same thing and they requested numbers from the last 7 days. It's much better IMO as you can see the threads that have recently been hot and not the same old threads that are now not active. Same thing goes for the active members, it was sort of boring to see the same list all the time and more interesting to see who currently active. The reason 7 days was selected is because the query is fairly intensive since it has to go through the database and figure things out. So if I set it to the last 30 days it would have to search through 4.2 times as much data before it calculates the values.

Do you like the fresher stats?
 
Westernskies said:
I believe the members list was taken away by the guys in the black helicopters under a secret UN program to put us all back to work ....
but, hey that's just me.:whistle:
Click to expand...

Why do you think that "all-cash" buyer from "Illinois" wanted to buy your old bedding? Hint from the terminally suspicious (me): keep a close eye on your duvets from now on :LOL:
 
I like the new way, but that is because I like to know what is going on right now, not what old threads are still kicking.

WS-you can also check beside the avatar for someone's join date--and as I've said before, high post count does not equal smarter! :cool:
 
Westernskies said:
That was much better; it gaves you a feel for who has been around here for a while.
Click to expand...
You can get that information (post totals) with a couple of clicks:

Click on "Members List" on the drop-down Community menu
Click on the "Posts" column heading to sort in descending order.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

aja8888
Show off your dog..or other pet..and how well he/she is treated (and fed)!
2 3
Replies
57
Views
2K
Gotadimple
Gotadimple
E
Speaking of Medicare part D
Replies
18
Views
1K
GhostofTomJoad
G
E
Trying to determine Fed Tax exemption (%) for funds w/V funds
Replies
5
Views
606
eroscott
E
D
Anyone negotiate a "severance" in non-RIF times?
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
NC 57
N
S
Reconciling micro observations with macro trends? (is the economy really doing well?)
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Koolau
Koolau

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom