California Exchanges Web Site Not Ready for Prime Time

TromboneAl

Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
12,880
I was eager to sign up for our Obamacare coverage, and started today. But the web site (coveredca.com), has a lot of problems, and is really, really slow. Not surprising, but it's best to wait awhile.

You'd think they'd get some good web designers in there. Instead, they've incorporated all the problems of other web pages. For example:

1. When you enter your SSN or phone, you cannot include dashes. It would be easy for the computer to remove dashes, but apparently that was too hard.

2. When I enter my address it tells me that it's different from what's on file.

I entered:

100 Street Name Dr.

It has on file:

100 Street Name, Dr.

Do I not rock the boat and go with the one on file??

3. The passwords are restricted in which characters are allowed, so that my standard password system does not work.

4. You must enter no less that five security questions -- things like "What was the year of your best sports moment?" and "If you were to choose a new first name, what would it be?"

5. The delay is several minutes for some pages.

6. The "Apply" option is grayed out for no known reason.

7. If I go to my account page, it looks like this:

2ARH1SC.jpg




But, it will be worth the hassle to save so much money.
 
Hi Al,

I'm in Ohio and haven't been able to login all day. I'm patient and I know this is all new and probably getting slammed.

When I get in I'm wondering if I should enter DH first since his SSN is the first one on our tax returns or if I should enter myself first since I need insurance for me but he's a maybe. I want to experiment with different scenarios and plans. I registered ahead of time and have a confirmed login created in my name, not DHs.

So far, all I get is a blank page at www.healthcare.gov after I login. The address is https://www.healthcare.gov/marketplace/auth/userprofile so I assume it's just overwhelmed right now.
 
There are reports of DDOS attacks on ACA web sites.
 
Probably have to wait for the media to stop hitting the servers.
 
I am in Virginia and have tried twice to open an account but I keep getting the message that the system is down. Has anybody been able to sign up so far? I am beginning to get suspicious that those who want this to fail is attacking the website.
 
Here is the error that I am getting on the Oregon website.

"Whoops, looks like something went wrong."
 
Patience.

My issue is that I want to shop in more than one state but the assumption is that you apply and then shop. Well, I don't know where I will want to apply until I know what is available.

I am going to do nothing for a couple of weeks.
 
The sites are all seeing a ridiculous amount of traffic today, between shoppers, the curious, and others. Healthcare.gov had already logged over a million unique visitors by noon (EDT).

Remember, none of the policies you can buy through the exchanges take effect until January 1, 2014. There's plenty of time. Give them a few days for the lookie-lous to get bored and the network managers to get their junk traffic filters tuned.

What we are seeing is not at all uncommon when rolling out a new website or online product. My former employer had their web site get slammed periodically with this sort of thing. (On the day of a new software release recently, their site accounted for 9% of global internet traffic that day. We're talking zetabytes of traffic. Yes, they bought insane server capacity to cover the load, including space on caching servers within a bunch of internet provider networks, something not an option when dealing with medical or tax return data.)

I need to get new coverage through coveredca.com but will wait until November. No rush. They won't run out of policies. Really.
 
Last edited:
No matter when we get the policy, today, next week or even next month, none will be effective before Jan 1. The phrase "hurry up and wait" comes to mind.
 
It's really much worse than I thought. I guess I will just wait awhile. Some of the problems aren't related to overloading. For example, I was able to create an account, but there is no place to log in:

FVF9NW7.jpg


If I select Shop and Compare, there's a sign in option, but that opens this:

Kqud1lf.jpg


which is not appropriate for the account I created (with a user name and password).

So, yeah, I'll give it a few days.
 
Oh you are so lucky (Que Four Yorkshiremen) you can get pricing info on the CA exchange and actually fill out an application. Here in paradise we have no pricing, no info about the plans. You can fill out a form to have somebody get back to you in the future. (The form application perform no error checking). To actually apply for a subsidy you are direct to Hawaiibenefits.gov. There you can find a PDF form which you can print out, fill out by hand and mail to some agency.

If the CA exchange is in in Early Beta, the Hawaii exchange is in pre alpha.
 
I was watching CNN and their " doctor reporter" stated that 6 out of 10 of the individuals buying into the exchange will be paying around 100 dollars a month for coverage. With those rates, I'm not so sure that they won't run out of policies. If not this year, then next.
 
I was watching CNN and their " doctor reporter" stated that 6 out of 10 of the individuals buying into the exchange will be paying around 100 dollars a month for coverage. With those rates, I'm not so sure that they won't run out of policies. If not this year, then next.
Already priced in.
 
Quick check this morning, and it is working and pretty snappily.
 
You'd think they'd get some good web designers in there. Instead, they've incorporated all the problems of other web pages. For example:

1. When you enter your SSN or phone, you cannot include dashes. It would be easy for the computer to remove dashes, but apparently that was too hard.
...

General web site comment:

I'd love to hear from any web designers on this. This kind of thing drives me nuts. It's the same with phone numbers, and CC numbers. I've actually been on some sites that don't show you what format they want the phone number in, until you enter it 'wrong', and then you get an error page that tells you to enter it as follows:

(AAA)EEE-XXXX

Phone numbers and SSNs are only numbers. Isn't it easier for the programmer to just strip any non-numeric from the input and accept it? I'm pretty sure that is only one command, something like INPUT(1234567890)? Isn't that easier than writing a separate error handling routine for this? CC numbers are kinda hard to enter and keep straight w/o spaces or dashes to help make sure you got it right. Just throw out the spaces and dashes.

What are(n't?) they thinking?

-ERD50
 
I was watching CNN and their " doctor reporter" stated that 6 out of 10 of the individuals buying into the exchange will be paying around 100 dollars a month for coverage. With those rates, I'm not so sure that they won't run out of policies. If not this year, then next.

I think this explains the overloading of the web sites.

Personally, I knew there was no rush to apply and it would be better to wait for the kinks to be worked out, but if your premiums were going to go from $900 to $29, wouldn't you want to sign up as soon as possible?
 
TromboneAl said:
I think this explains the overloading of the web sites.

Personally, I knew there was no rush to apply and it would be better to wait for the kinks to be worked out, but if your premiums were going to go from $900 to $29, wouldn't you want to sign up as soon as possible?

Yes I would. Hell, if I could get anything for 29 dollars a month I'd sign up.
 
That would be amazing if the insurance companies were spot on in their pricing.
Yes, that would be amazing. But it would not be amazing that CBO and others, including insurance companies, could predict the general makeup of the uninsured and estimate within reasonable bounds what the subsidies will cost. Will they be spot on? No, of course not. Will the costs be so wildly off that the republic as we know it is doomed as the heated rhetoric proclaims? No, of course not.

But even more germane, the ultimate cost to taxpayers for subsidies will not effect insurance company pricing for the policies. The companies get paid the full price whether the holders are subsidized or not. Policy prices are driven by the health status of the pool members. That is why the ACA saboteurs are trying to scare away the young -- to drive up costs for everyone else and undermine support for the program.
 
donheff said:
Yes, that would be amazing. But it would not be amazing that CBO and others, including insurance companies, could predict the general makeup of the uninsured and estimate within reasonable bounds what the subsidies will cost. Will they be spot on? No, of course not. Will the costs be so wildly off that the republic as we know it is doomed as the heated rhetoric proclaims? No, of course not.

But even more germane, the ultimate cost to taxpayers for subsidies will not effect insurance company pricing for the policies. The companies get paid the full price whether the holders are subsidized or not. Policy prices are driven by the health status of the pool members. That is why the ACA saboteurs are trying to scare away the young -- to drive up costs for everyone else and undermine support for the program.

I'm not one to look a gift horse in the mouth. I'm just surprised that there are so many of us on the receiving end. Is this a great country, or what?!
 
I signed up for Covered California this morning with no problems. The only problem I'm having is with the Doctor and Hospital search. I get the same answer with every single doctor or hospital I type in... "No Results Found". I'm hoping it's a glitch.

There must be a way to access each Insurance Company's full provider lists, but I haven't found it yet.
 
I think this explains the overloading of the web sites.

Personally, I knew there was no rush to apply and it would be better to wait for the kinks to be worked out, but if your premiums were going to go from $900 to $29, wouldn't you want to sign up as soon as possible?

Ah, if only that were true for many of us. I got on the CA site late yesterday. $1423 per month to get even close to my current/likely soon to be former plan. 60 percent increase! Income is above the threshold to get an entitlement-subsidy. No thanks.
 
Last edited:
Ah, if only that were true for many of us. I got on the CA site late yesterday. $1423 per month to get even close to my current/likely soon to be former plan. 60 percent increase! Income is above the threshold to get an entitlement-subsidy. No thanks.

What will you do for health insurance then?
 
Back
Top Bottom