lets-retire
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2004
- Messages
- 1,798
Since ruger has generally characterized me as being either rich or a God fearing idiot I have to add. I do not believe in God, at all. I am also probably one of the few on this board who will not be able to retire until my wife reaches the age where she qualifies for Medicare (if she lives ling enough) and I am older than she is. I would rather work the extra 10-15 years required, than have a universal health care program. I am a victim of this government's only heath care for everyone program. Some call it the military and VA. I have been seriously disappointed with care from both the military and VA. I am adamantly opposed to socialized health care. I do believe it will get here soon enough, but I do not believe it will be as effective or inexpensive as many seem to be touting.
Personally I would much rather fight against an insurance company and take them to court than have to fight against the federal government and take them to court. It used to find it funny when my wife was covered by both Tricare and her company insurance. The argument went something like this.
Insurance: Orr policy is to be subordinate to ALL other insurance companies.
Wife: Tricare is a federal insurance program and they are subordinate by law.
Insurance: I don't care we are subordinate. Tricare must pay first and we will cover everything left over.
Wife: can you hold a minute I have another call.
(Wife returns with Tricare representative)
Tricare: Hello this is @@@# with Tricare. We are subordinate to all other insurance policies.
Insurance: Sorry but our company policy to only to pay whatever any other existing policy won't.
Tricare: Sorry but it is federal regulation that we pay last.
Insurance: Sorry we will pay first.
Do you think you will be able to adequately fight against federal regulation (normally with the force of law) more effectively than the policy of a private company? I doubt it.
Before you get too down on the rich and the top 10% being selfish and uncaring, that is the description of many if not most on this board.
Personally I would much rather fight against an insurance company and take them to court than have to fight against the federal government and take them to court. It used to find it funny when my wife was covered by both Tricare and her company insurance. The argument went something like this.
Insurance: Orr policy is to be subordinate to ALL other insurance companies.
Wife: Tricare is a federal insurance program and they are subordinate by law.
Insurance: I don't care we are subordinate. Tricare must pay first and we will cover everything left over.
Wife: can you hold a minute I have another call.
(Wife returns with Tricare representative)
Tricare: Hello this is @@@# with Tricare. We are subordinate to all other insurance policies.
Insurance: Sorry but our company policy to only to pay whatever any other existing policy won't.
Tricare: Sorry but it is federal regulation that we pay last.
Insurance: Sorry we will pay first.
Do you think you will be able to adequately fight against federal regulation (normally with the force of law) more effectively than the policy of a private company? I doubt it.
Before you get too down on the rich and the top 10% being selfish and uncaring, that is the description of many if not most on this board.