John Galt III
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 2,874
Looking for an angle with which to refuse this 'medication management'.
Background: Mom is currently in skilled nursing, scheduled to go back to assisted living in 2 days.
Someone assessed her as not being able to self-medicate. I told several people at the CCRC she is in that I think she can self-medicate. Told the social worker, a few nurses, the housing director, and one of my voicemails was forwarded to the Director of Nursing so she knows too.
I asked the social worker if we could refuse the med mgmt program ($450 to $850 per month, depending on how many visits they say needs per day). A nurse brings a pill or pills to the room in a cup, to give to patient.
Social worker went blank, said I could escalate to Director of Nursing and to Director of Health Care. She also said they might say it is a 'safety issue' which causes them to not let Mom self-medicate.
Mom has a poor short term memory but can manage these pills, I believe.
She has done it before, just a year ago, with the 7 day pill box.
She only has synthroid, an iron pill, colase (stool softener), and omeprazole.
Iron pill is for anemia.
She already takes her synthroid every morning without being coached.
A nurse told me she would be OK with Mom self-medicating, as long as a family member were there for the first few days to monitor her.
I plan to talk to the Dir of Nursing tomorrow about it, and possibly the Director of Health Care.
My assumption is they will not concede any ground unless I say the right things. Don't know what those right things are, other than 'I think Mom can self-medicate. I disagree with the assessment'.
And possibly "We have the right to refuse medication'
And for clarification about this post, * we are fine with taking the meds.*
We are not fine with paying them $450 to $850 per month to administer them.
Ideas welcomed !
edit to add: The social worker told me they might not release Mom from skilled nursing if we refuse med management for this supposed 'safety' reason. Her insurance coverage will have ended for her skilled nursing, at that time. That, apparently, is their bludgeon in the argument.
Background: Mom is currently in skilled nursing, scheduled to go back to assisted living in 2 days.
Someone assessed her as not being able to self-medicate. I told several people at the CCRC she is in that I think she can self-medicate. Told the social worker, a few nurses, the housing director, and one of my voicemails was forwarded to the Director of Nursing so she knows too.
I asked the social worker if we could refuse the med mgmt program ($450 to $850 per month, depending on how many visits they say needs per day). A nurse brings a pill or pills to the room in a cup, to give to patient.
Social worker went blank, said I could escalate to Director of Nursing and to Director of Health Care. She also said they might say it is a 'safety issue' which causes them to not let Mom self-medicate.
Mom has a poor short term memory but can manage these pills, I believe.
She has done it before, just a year ago, with the 7 day pill box.
She only has synthroid, an iron pill, colase (stool softener), and omeprazole.
Iron pill is for anemia.
She already takes her synthroid every morning without being coached.
A nurse told me she would be OK with Mom self-medicating, as long as a family member were there for the first few days to monitor her.
I plan to talk to the Dir of Nursing tomorrow about it, and possibly the Director of Health Care.
My assumption is they will not concede any ground unless I say the right things. Don't know what those right things are, other than 'I think Mom can self-medicate. I disagree with the assessment'.
And possibly "We have the right to refuse medication'
And for clarification about this post, * we are fine with taking the meds.*
We are not fine with paying them $450 to $850 per month to administer them.
Ideas welcomed !
edit to add: The social worker told me they might not release Mom from skilled nursing if we refuse med management for this supposed 'safety' reason. Her insurance coverage will have ended for her skilled nursing, at that time. That, apparently, is their bludgeon in the argument.
Last edited: