US steel bonds yield near 20%

Jmo1969

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
76
Location
Miami
Any one have an opinion?


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
 
I would guess that they are extremely high risk...

Commodities are going down in price, including steel. The economy is slowing again. They just shut down some iron mines here in MN and will have a bunch of layoffs.

Do you feel lucky?
 
No I don't feel lucky. I read some research and they are burning a little cash but not too much. My question is this. Will the US allow a company as significant as this to fail. I could see the equity going lower but the debt seems like a decent risk reward given the fact that everything is still perceived as bad and can just get better. But really I don't know the industry.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
 
Only 20%? I have some gold/copper mining company bonds which are paying 29%. I just got a $1875 payment a week ago.
 
I had some GM bonds like that. I would have come out OK, except that the administration decided to put the unions ahead of the bond holders in the distribution of GM's remains.
 
My question is this. Will the US allow a company as significant as this to fail.

Do some research on the coal industry...

China can meet all of out steel needs, and not ruin our environment. It's a win-win situation. But may not be for the bonds...
 
Last edited:
Do some research on the coal industry...

China can meet all of out steel needs, and not ruin our environment. It's a win-win situation. But may not be for the bonds...


That would not be a promising precedent. Buy the bonds and next thing you know, being a peon bondholder, you get squeezed taking pennies on the dollar in a "restructuring" or X amount all converted into lovely common shares on a "recapitalization".


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
I have shares of ArcelorMittal (and lost >50% on them), the European equivalent (but 5 times bigger), so I have a vague notion of the steel industry.

Long story short: it is not been good since 2009, and been getting worse with Chinese steel dumping their wares below cost. Governments are expected to react, but slowly. In addition the industry is CO2 intensive. Lots of dark clouds.

ArcelorMittal's debt got downgraded again recently.

Looking at US Steel's numbers they seem to be in even direr straits than MT, with much less equity.

Nevertheless 20% is a nice yield. I'd only buy in a diversified manner., and double check on the seniority. Net 30% equity is not a lot to absorb losses in case of bankruptcy.

ArcelorMittal keeps saying the apparent steel consumption is going up so recovery will happen in the end (high fixed cost business). But nobody really knows. A few players might as well go bankrupt. It's still a highly fragmented industry.
 
Last edited:
If you do not know how to evaluate what your likely recovery is in a bankruptcy situation, keep walking.
 
In the case of steel bankruptcy valuation it's quite simple:

  • Inventories, receivables, cash 80% (valued at cost or market, whichever is lower)
  • Intangibles 0%
  • Deferred income taxes: 0%
  • PPE: anywhere from 0% to 50%
Using those numbers you end up with roughly 0.35 up to 0.55 of book value. Incidently, market value is 0.4 price to book so Mr. Market agrees.



Equity is 30% of book value, so a haircut of 20% to 50% can be expected if they do go under. Much has to do whether plants will shutdown (makes em worthless) or can be kept going.
 
Do some research on the coal industry...

China can meet all of out steel needs, and not ruin our environment. It's a win-win situation. But may not be for the bonds...

Well, first of all I don't think Chinese manufacturing will be more "earth-friendly" than US manufacturing. Second of all, "offshoring" industries seems fine and good (except for those families affected by layoffs) until we hit some sort of world crisis where an essential commodity isn't being produced by your own nation or a *very* trusted ally. Finally, given the legendary horror stories about the quality and toxicity of so much Chinese manufacturing, it doesn't exactly give me a warm fuzzy.
 
Personally I'm scared of high yield corporate bonds... Especially if they are adjustable. I think when interest rates start to rise the huge run up on cheap corporate debt over the last few years combined with investors chasing yield (you know... Fund managers and pensions who have to get 7% but be 50% bonds) has made that asset class pretty scary. If interest rates are low and a corporate bond yield is very high and investors are chasing them my guess is they must be overpriced and will eventually fall back to earth.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Early Retirement Forum mobile app
 
Personally I'm scared of high yield corporate bonds... Especially if they are adjustable. I think when interest rates start to rise the huge run up on cheap corporate debt over the last few years combined with investors chasing yield (you know... Fund managers and pensions who have to get 7% but be 50% bonds) has made that asset class pretty scary. If interest rates are low and a corporate bond yield is very high and investors are chasing them my guess is they must be overpriced and will eventually fall back to earth.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Early Retirement Forum mobile app


If you think high yield corporate debt is scary, try even higher yielding junk preferred stocks. And yet people buy them, and actually complain about the haircuts their getting on investment forums. Investment grade, 6%-7% and safe is my sandbox I play in.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Chinese steel?:facepalm:

The oil & gas industry gave up on buying their well casing and pump rods....too many failures and downhole failures are VERY expensive to fix.

Now sheet metal may be a different story if all you do with it is make car fenders and washing machine housings. As long as the paint don't fall off and it doesn't rust out within the warranty period, all is good!
 
No I don't feel lucky. I read some research and they are burning a little cash but not too much. My question is this. Will the US allow a company as significant as this to fail. I could see the equity going lower but the debt seems like a decent risk reward given the fact that everything is still perceived as bad and can just get better. But really I don't know the industry.
The let Lucent go... and later wondered what had happened to the US telcom company when a Chinese one wanted to sell communication systems. I think it is more of a lobbyist question... can the lobbyist convince the government.
 
US Steel has a market cap of less than 1.5 billion... Twitter has a market cap of over 17 Billion. Andrew Carnegie would be turning over in his grave if he knew todays world....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Well, first of all I don't think Chinese manufacturing will be more "earth-friendly" than US manufacturing. Second of all, "offshoring" industries seems fine and good (except for those families affected by layoffs) until we hit some sort of world crisis where an essential commodity isn't being produced by your own nation or a *very* trusted ally. Finally, given the legendary horror stories about the quality and toxicity of so much Chinese manufacturing, it doesn't exactly give me a warm fuzzy.

A bit off topic, but when people see open pit mines digging taconite for making steel, they see an environmental disaster. When it's in China, no one from the USA sees it. Like a slaughter house. It's OK when it's made in China, and the US Steel industry doesn't matter.

We have many agreements in place to keep the Chinese from disrupting our supply of goods, or even counterfeiting items. So no worries about being a trusted partner.
 
In the case of steel bankruptcy valuation it's quite simple:

  • Inventories, receivables, cash 80% (valued at cost or market, whichever is lower)
  • Intangibles 0%
  • Deferred income taxes: 0%
  • PPE: anywhere from 0% to 50%
Using those numbers you end up with roughly 0.35 up to 0.55 of book value. Incidently, market value is 0.4 price to book so Mr. Market agrees.



Equity is 30% of book value, so a haircut of 20% to 50% can be expected if they do go under. Much has to do whether plants will shutdown (makes em worthless) or can be kept going.

I'd probably approach this from an EV/EBITDA angle, but triangulation is best.
 
seems to me they can borrow on prosper for less .
 
The interest rate they are paying is lower than 20%, they are listed below par value.

Yield is on current value, not on the outstanding loan amount.
 
Has anyone looked at the junk bond ETFs lately? JNK and HYG have horrible charts. Oil and commodities are really crushing them.
 
Back
Top Bottom