John Clements' article in the WSJ today talks about how to survive retirement even if you are short on savings. He quotes William Bernstein who says this about withdrawal rates: Two percent is bullet-proof, 3% is probably safe, 4% is pushing it and, at 5% you're eating Alpo in your old age.
Trouble is that many don't have enough money to limit their withdrawals to this extent. Clements makes a couple of suggestions. One possibility is to buy an income annuity and delay social security. However, some do not like the idea of not living long enough to reap the benefits.
His other suggestion is to think about retirement in two stages. One before age 85 and one after. He suggests planning to spend down 85% of your portfolio before age 85. Invest the other 15% in stocks and 20 year inflation indexed treasury bonds. Spend that remaining money after age 85 and if necessary, tap on your home's equity.
He is presuming a traditional retirement at age 65 and a plan to spend 85% in 20 years.
Not an ideal plan but one that might help those who would have a hard time living on a lower withdrawal rate.
Trouble is that many don't have enough money to limit their withdrawals to this extent. Clements makes a couple of suggestions. One possibility is to buy an income annuity and delay social security. However, some do not like the idea of not living long enough to reap the benefits.
His other suggestion is to think about retirement in two stages. One before age 85 and one after. He suggests planning to spend down 85% of your portfolio before age 85. Invest the other 15% in stocks and 20 year inflation indexed treasury bonds. Spend that remaining money after age 85 and if necessary, tap on your home's equity.
He is presuming a traditional retirement at age 65 and a plan to spend 85% in 20 years.
Not an ideal plan but one that might help those who would have a hard time living on a lower withdrawal rate.